Violence is a form of self-expression.
Laws are there, but as you and others know, every action has a reaction.
Chicago: 16 year old Hindu kid burns Quran, gets confronted by local Muslims
- Thread starter hatehs
- Start date
Violence is a form of self-expression.
Laws are there, but as you and others know, every action has a reaction.
Trango Towers
ELITE MEMBER
- Joined
- Oct 29, 2016
- Messages
- 21,951
- Reaction score
- -18
- Country
- Location
It's also a freedom of expression when Hindus get shot. Expression (big smile).
what a dumb statement
Bilal9
ELITE MEMBER
- Joined
- Feb 4, 2014
- Messages
- 26,569
- Reaction score
- 9
- Country
- Location
Amazing - just amazing!
I have yet to find one Muslim person who opposes them building their place of worship (Temple complexes). In fact - I know some Muslims who have helped in that effort for both Massive complexes (Chino Hills, CA and NJ).
These narrow-minded scum have left India for a far better place, but fail to share in the freedom of worship the new country offers them. They are not fit to live in better societies.
What skin is off their back if Muslims pray? It's not like these H1B idiots are going to stay there forever. Just narrow-minded idiots.
Last edited:
Muji.Iqbal
SENIOR MEMBER
- Joined
- Apr 19, 2023
- Messages
- 2,219
- Reaction score
- -3
- Country
- Location
Lets burn the Vedas then since he burned the Qur'an.
Bilal9
ELITE MEMBER
- Joined
- Feb 4, 2014
- Messages
- 26,569
- Reaction score
- 9
- Country
- Location
The US has freedom of expression, but also freedom to practice one's religion.
Religious hate has no place in US societies and communities.
Finding a traffic bollard in a park and starting to worship it as a lingam and fertility symbol (like Hindu women did in a SF park) is also freedom of expression, as odd as it is. Even if one is past menopause and can't conceive babies anymore.
Hindus opposing the rights of worship for Muslims goes against the US constitution - read that sometime and see what it says.
Forget burning the Qur'an, even hate speech (or online hate speech) is a prosecutable offence in the US.
These RSS'ers will learn very quickly that the US does not tolerate hate speech like India does.
Hate speech - Wikipedia
Last edited:
Bilal9
ELITE MEMBER
- Joined
- Feb 4, 2014
- Messages
- 26,569
- Reaction score
- 9
- Country
- Location
Good luck in hiding under the protection of law - when you are opposing constitutional rights.
Bilal9
ELITE MEMBER
- Joined
- Feb 4, 2014
- Messages
- 26,569
- Reaction score
- 9
- Country
- Location
I don't think us stooping to their hate-filled level sets a good precedent.
They would have more excuses to burn more Qur'ans.
Burning Qur'ans are a form of religious hate speech - it can be argued and the perpetrator prosecuted under the law.
These idiots can be sent to jail - the US is not Sweden (or India).
If these H1B idiots emigrate to the US, the least they should do is inculcate new values in a new country.
Not holding out high hopes though.
Last edited:
ProudThamizhan
FULL MEMBER
- Joined
- Mar 29, 2023
- Messages
- 1,385
- Reaction score
- 1
- Country
- Location
school kid has no business burning any book. should have been taught / known better.
BUT I can't find anything via google that this happened. Is there any link to the burning story or was this made up by the mad tweeter?
HOWEVER while searching for it, came across this below. Can any muslim person confirm elaborate on this?
GERALD OGUTU
Author has 996 answers and 120.8K answer viewsJan 29
In 651 AD, Uthman began the burning of the Quran and other Islamic texts. If Allah allows a rightfully guided caliph to burn the original Quran, copies that Muhammad touched, then burning the Quran is not improper but proper. You can copy the Quran and make changes as you see fit, just as Uthman did.
If you are going to destroy copies, all that is required is that no letters be visible.
the burning is allowed, otherwise you are saying that Uthman was not rightful caliph.
BUT I can't find anything via google that this happened. Is there any link to the burning story or was this made up by the mad tweeter?
HOWEVER while searching for it, came across this below. Can any muslim person confirm elaborate on this?
GERALD OGUTU
Author has 996 answers and 120.8K answer viewsJan 29
In 651 AD, Uthman began the burning of the Quran and other Islamic texts. If Allah allows a rightfully guided caliph to burn the original Quran, copies that Muhammad touched, then burning the Quran is not improper but proper. You can copy the Quran and make changes as you see fit, just as Uthman did.
If you are going to destroy copies, all that is required is that no letters be visible.
the burning is allowed, otherwise you are saying that Uthman was not rightful caliph.
waz
ADMINISTRATOR
- Joined
- Sep 15, 2006
- Messages
- 21,159
- Reaction score
- 91
- Country
- Location
Islamic Center Of Naperville
islamiccenterofnaperville.org
Hahahahaha it got built and is thriving.
You’d think they would have learnt from what happened to them in the UK and AUS. But no.
mehmed bey
FULL MEMBER
- Joined
- Aug 30, 2023
- Messages
- 794
- Reaction score
- 0
- Country
- Location
All what I can say that Panjeet will beaten tomorrow in London
There is no blanket freedom of expression less so for gobar flavored cow piss laced hate speech.
arjunk
SENIOR MEMBER
- Joined
- Apr 16, 2020
- Messages
- 3,251
- Reaction score
- 1
- Country
- Location
Importh the seventh world, become the seventh world...
Trango Towers
ELITE MEMBER
- Joined
- Oct 29, 2016
- Messages
- 21,951
- Reaction score
- -18
- Country
- Location
Crazy isn't it...there is nit a single incident of Muslims burning any book
Similar threads
- Article
