It is not clear because you are again playing with words. You cannot have it both ways. The transmitted wave OR the reflected wave ?
And I asked you above again, is the wave after reflection different?
and to clear the thing up.
look at the following image :
This explains to EVERYBODY with ENGINEERING BACKGROUND why for all intends and purposes a transmission = reflection.
Not that I expect you to understand it.
Sounds like some made up sh1t to me. Word salad indeed.
Avionics. Ten years of it in the USAF. More real than you can ever 'word salad' together.
Yes it does. For the receiver it does. For ANY receiver it does. Any target is a radiator and the METHOD OF PRODUCTION is usually discarded as a factor by receiver design. The word 'receiver' here can mean a physically distinct antenna or it can mean the receiver portion of the radar computer. Why should the receiver care whether the signal it picked up came from a transmitter or from a reflection? And if it does not care, then all targets are radiators/transmitters regardless of method.
Then he used his home printer to print up a diploma that says honors graduate from 'Program Study in Aeronautics & Astronautics'.
Yes it does. For the receiver it does. For ANY receiver it does. Any target is a radiator and the METHOD OF PRODUCTION is usually discarded as a factor by receiver design. The word 'receiver' here can mean a physically distinct antenna or it can mean the receiver portion of the radar computer. Why should the receiver care whether the signal it picked up came from a transmitter or from a reflection? And if it does not care, then all targets are radiators/transmitters regardless of method.
But of course, if you have any REAL aviation study, not the made up sh1t you 'word salad-ed' up, you would have known this.
When you used that made up 'experience' to try to shut down the Indians, then you are obligated to show everyone what is that experience. This sh1t 'Program Study in Aeronautics & Astronautics' sounds made up to me.
A reflected signal usually matches the transmitted signal. It is just as much a wave as the transmitted signal and contains all the pulse characteristics. This tells everyone that you do not even have the basic sciences required. And to think you actually got 'Thanked' for your nonsense. It says much about the intelligence of those who 'Thanked' you for your nonsensical posts.
A reflected signal usually matches the transmitted signal. It is just as much a wave as the transmitted signal and contains all the pulse characteristics. This tells everyone that you do not even have the basic sciences required. And to think you actually got 'Thanked' for your nonsense. It says much about the intelligence of those who 'Thanked' you for your nonsensical posts.
You are busted, little boy. When you cannot even answer a first year aerodynamics question while you claimed 'experience' or 'study' -- you are busted.Prove it that I ever claim aviation experience!
Program Study in Aeronautics & Astronautics' sounds made up to you, because you really dont have aviation background at all; thats why you dont have clue
Matched doesnt mean the same. You are idiot.
See.. you are trapped with your own word gaming.
I said: reflection does not produce wave and modulation while transmission does.
Do you understand that? If you do - why cant you see the glaring difference?
It proves that you dont have background. You are just a liar and fake.
See.. what you can do is DENY, DENY and DENY!
I have told you "that transmitter produce wave and modulation while reflection not; it automatically imply both are totally different. And you cant replied nor bust anymore.
If i dont and you have, then why cant you bring any evidence/citation to bust my argument?
You are denying and grumbling like an old pa
And where is it the professional citation that oppose to my argument (reflection doesnt produce wave/modulation as transmission does) ?
You claim that it is a high school level of understanding but the sadness you cant even bring any professional citation or evidence to prove that I am wrong.
This is hilarious. 
