rcrmj
SENIOR MEMBER
- Joined
- Jan 5, 2011
- Messages
- 6,322
- Reaction score
- -12
- Country
- Location
we are much ahead of Russia in radar technologies now`````dual-bands, multipul-bands, infrared+optical+radar integrated sensor system```etc```there are loads "arse kicking" projects under development in the sensor field``````so if the assumption of aquiring Su-35 was under the fact of its radar, then we wouldnt even pay a little interest in the first place`````so was the engine too`````The main radar is a X-band PESA. But It has two small L-band AESA installed inside leading edge of both wings.
I do not think Su-35’s radar is superior neither.
But for a long time we hear about that all stealthy aircrafts were optimized at X-band, not L-band.
So I really wonder whether the dual-band radar concept works against J-20. Maybe we can know that by :1. Will we buy more Su-35; 2 Will PLA implement similar modification.
I do not doubt J-20's ability.Putting stealth aside, its Super-cruise, sensors and avionics are lethal too.
detecting a stealth object is a very complicated process, let alone to establish a firm track, and a solid lock, then finally stable guide and data links to firing missiles``````it is all about building a 5th gen network centric air combat system! and thats the real meaning and deadliness of F-35 (not the media hype or ignorant people's delusion). and this is what J-20 built to be!
so as I am going to say it again and again, there is no place for a plane like Su-35 in a 5th gen network centric air combat system`````it is just an average 4th gen (4.5 if you might want to call it) that can be very effective under some circumstance```thats it
and 5th gen network centric air combat system`````U.S and China`````only these two```I'm putting my words here and smoke like a bad-a$$``“Putting stealth aside”
Stealth is the most important feature of the J-20 ... LOL