Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
2101、2102 and 2103?
If they like, they can take off afterburner usedRelevant to your payload and take off length available
Fighters used to take off at under 500km/h, and not too fast, because higher speed would damage the landing gear system
Just a few completely different questions:
- Can anyone explain why we are so sure that the second prototype '2002' was renumbered to '2004' ???
- What's the source of this, since I can't think that CAC reported or even confirmed this?
- Was there ever a similar other situation, when a prototype was completely renumbered? (as far as I know for both the J-7 and J-10 never)
- Could it be that '2004' is probably another prototype ? ... or in return if there is a "habit" to renumber prototypes for the J-20 program, why we are then so sure that all "201x" prototypes are indeed different aircraft ? I
I'm quite sure that they are all true ... but this "renumbering" issue is a story I simply do not understand.
Deino
I don't have my HDD with me today, but I can confirm that 2002 is renumbered to 2004.
Henri K.
Just found ...
http://lt.cjdby.net/forum.php?mod=viewthread&tid=2134124
Even if they show '2016' and not '2101'... are these recent images (tread started and images posted today) or older ones ? And what are they talking about a '111' ??
Deino
View attachment 285947 View attachment 285948
Just found ...
http://lt.cjdby.net/forum.php?mod=viewthread&tid=2134124
Even if they show '2016' and not '2101'... are these recent images (tread started and images posted today) or older ones ? And what are they talking about a '111' ??
Deino
View attachment 285947 View attachment 285948