Yeah...The evidences said despite a join date of 2009, I have only 80-something post count and ONE long discussion. But hey...Exaggerations and the lies, there and here, are the Chinese boys' stock in trade.
There you go again.
You're accusing us of: "Exaggerations and the lies, there and here, are the Chinese boys' stock in trade." This is your standard routine. Never miss an opportunity to smear the Chinese members. Come on, take a break.
If you made the same baseless accusation in the Indian sub-forum, you would be banned instantly. The only reason you haven't been banned in the Chinese sub-forum by now is due to the gracious forbearance of the Chinese members. Think about that for a while.
----------
Since I just remembered, I will take this opportunity to remind you of another bogus criticism of yours about the J-20. Based on a picture of the J-20's vertical stabilizers, you claimed the J-20 likely/possibly had a software integration problem. You remember that crazy claim of yours?
Another erroneous, misleading, and totally unwarranted criticism of China's J-20 Mighty Dragon as a result of your strong anti-China bias.
----------
In an earlier post you challenged me to name a single untrue claim/statement by you. Here are three:
1. Your stubborn claim that warheads only fall vertically onto their targets. (Yes, I know about your latest excuses. I don't find them convincing. You screwed up, admit it.)
2. You objected to my claim that China's ASBM had a 1,000 km range. I remember you also called me a "fanboy" repeatedly in that thread, which made me more determined to prove you wrong. Otherwise, I might have just let the issue slide. Anyway, using my argument of a likely Chinese SOSUS system, my calculation of 930 to 960 km detection range proved my claim of a 1,000 km range for China's ASBM was perfectly reasonable.
3. You made the crazy claim about J-20 software integration problems based on a picture of a parked J-20 and the position of its vertical stabilizers. I argued that China had over a decade of experience with fly-by-wire on the J-10 (since its first flight in 1998). You ignored my insight and insisted there was a software integration problem. The J-20 Mighty Dragon flew within a couple of weeks of your crazy claim. You were proven wrong.
Bottom line: There you have it. You make plenty of mistakes like the rest of us. Stop claiming to be infallible. You're embarrassing yourself.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chengdu_J-10#Flight_control_system
"Due to the J-10's aerodynamically unstable design, a digital quadruplex-redundant fly-by-wire flight control system aids the pilot in flying the aircraft. Chinese aircraft designer Yang Wei is claimed to be the chief designer of the fly-by-wire flight control system....The flight control computer provides automatic flight coordination and keeps the aircraft from entering potentially dangerous situations such as unintentional slops or skids. This therefore frees the pilot to concentrate on his intended tasks during the combat."
...But the reality is that my mockery of you Chinese boys has more to do with your willingness to engage in intellectual dishonesty than of your intelligence and education. If anything, the more intelligent and educated the person, the greater that willingness to cast aside his education and the demand for critical thinking from that education to support a view and/or express an opinion he knows to be wrong.
