ptldM3
SENIOR MEMBER
- Joined
- Nov 20, 2009
- Messages
- 5,586
- Reaction score
- 19
- Country
- Location
IF you want to ask me in order to TEST my qualification during the debate, then please show your own QUALIFICATION first.
Don’t play games. I want to test you because you were the one bragging that other people don’t know what they are quoting, so I want to know if you know what you are quoting. Remember it was you that stated, only a qualified person can explain the context of their quote. If you ask me to explain my quote I would be more than happy to do so but you refuse to do the same, why? Because you can’t answer, it’s not that you don’t want to answer but that you are simply not able to answer.
Do you know what you are debating? Do you know that matters? because if you dont know, you were not supposed to debate severely with stubborn.
You are lying. I never claim my self expert, you are slandering like your master Gambit now
It is funny if you claim you want to learn from me while you are debating me like hell and show your attitude of stubborn and ignorance against me.
And if you want to learn about that issue, why dont you go to the one who proclaim as True / Real Aviation Expert here, then come back to me to continue our debate?
Evidence => Gambit: "I know more about the cone regarding aviation than you do".
Source: http://www.defence.pk/forums/chines...ft-updates-discussions-185.html#ixzz25Hjpb2Tf
Asking me for thirst of knowledge and debating me is 2 contradictive things that prove your hypocrisy!
Nooo ... i did not see that; or please show me your satisfactory answer for your claim that I am challenging you. I remember you leave my last question.
Your statement that you want to know genuinely from me for the thirst of knowledge in fact is contradicting to your behavior/attitude with your ignorance, stubborn and accusation against me during the debate.
But if you ask me in order to test me, then let me know first if you yourself really understand the issue as relevance to the debate. The tester should be more qualified or at least as qualified.
Shame on you for your hypocrisy!
It would be easier to just admit you that you do not know the answer to the question instead of posting an emotional rant.
If you knew the answer you would have answered me months ago, instead you keep playing these games and making excuses such as, “why should I answer?” Or, “The tester should be more qualified or at least as qualified” You keep accusing other members of not knowing what they quote, or not understanding their own source yet when I called you out and asked you to explain your own source you stopped dead in your tracks.
I am merely asking you to explain what your own quote meant. I’m not asking you to explain my quote, I’m not asking you to explain a random question, I’m asking you to explain your quote, something that you keep refusing to do even though it goes against everything you have been saying. You don’t know the answer to your own quote, that much is clear.
Noo... so far i notice the reader asking me that is only you, dont lie!
OR can you prove other many readers asking that?? you have to be honest here.
I’m a reader, I want to know. Other reader do not need to openly ask for the answer to the question , it’s reasonable to assume that the readers of this military forum would like to know the answers to aviation questions especially when someone quotes something and someone else asks what that quote means.
I want to see your genuine motive behind your question, before I address your question that you claim as a genuine question in quest.
All I want to know is if you knew what you quoted, it’s simple as that. After asking you a dozen times it’s clear you don’t know the answer, an answer to your own quote nevertheless.