You have a serious reading comprehension problem regarding technical language. You basically repeated what I said in different form, then tells me I am wrong.
If that is the case, then you dont answer my question yet.
This is my question: "If the traveling wave could reach the hidden moving parts, then why should it exposed in order to contribute to RCS? idiot?"
Source:
http://www.defence.pk/forums/chines...ft-updates-discussions-182.html#ixzz24TiovKsL
Then this is what you tried to answer:
There are plenty of moving parts behind the engine blades, but the parts that actually contribute the greatest to engine RCS are the foremost fan blades.
Source:
http://www.defence.pk/forums/chines...ft-updates-discussions-182.html#ixzz24TchcqiS
What is the relevance of your answer with my question?
Everybody knows that Fanblade contribute more to RCS than moving parts behind it.
Just like everybody knows that the cone (of mig-21) contribute more to RCS than the moving parts behind it.
We have agreed that the point we are debating here is not the cone or fanblade itself as RCS contributor, but how the moving part could contribute to RCS.
We are talking about AFTER those signals breached the foremost fan blades. Not before. So absorber is not the issue here.
The same!
The traveling wave reflected from the blade will be absorbed by the RAM coating.
Nothing but the cone itself. If you are so certain that there are exposed translation mechanisms, then show us a source. Do you even know the proper context of 'translation' here?
Nothing?
This is what you said:
The ramp and the cone and variations of the cone have more such exposed items and none are from translating mechanisms.
Source:
http://www.defence.pk/forums/chines...ft-updates-discussions-182.html#ixzz24TdqNN7f
Which more exposed items of the cone you mean?
Yours is a childish method of debate by answering questions with questions. It is a sign of ignorance of the subject matter.
I am not answering, in fact I am asking what you are claiming!
If your statement false, then your argument ruins.
You seem trying to evade, why? cant you answered that?
Then show us what an 'expert' YOU are. You claimed to have an aviation 'background' and 'study'. Since aviation have many sub disciplines, what was your 'study'? So far we know it is not even in basic aerodynamics.
You are stupid.
I've told you : "I dont feel as an expert by the smilies."
Source:
http://www.defence.pk/forums/chines...ft-updates-discussions-183.html#ixzz24TfSiHFC
It is you who claim as an Aviation Expert with educational and professional background
I already answered it but will again. The surface is EM transparent and allows penetration into the substrate where the portions of the traveling wave will be attenuated by embedded ferrite particles. I bet you do not even understand what I just said.
Wrong!
The right explanation is: EM waves induce molecular oscillations from the alternating magnetic field in this paint, which leads to conversion of the radar energy into heat. The heat is then transferred to the aircraft and dissipated.
Nothing to do with EM transparent, as I said: EM transparent mean that part of EM wave is going through the material, part is reflected, or part is absorbed in case of RAM coat.
Q: In a 'bicycle' landing gear configuration, what item counter-balances another item? Hint: High speed.
A: At high speed for a 'bicycle' landing gear config, as in higher than normal take-off/landing for the aircraft, the front gear will bear a disproportionate load of force and potential for instability exist, however, at the same time there exists sufficient aerodynamic forces at the rudder to counterbalance.
This make a dozen basic aerodynamics and seven flight controls engineering questions that you failed to answer despite claiming an aviation 'background' and 'study' that you tried to use to shut down the Indians.
Next...This question will touch on your philosophical understanding of Engineering as a profession in general.
Q: What are the three principles of Engineering in order of establishments and priority?
Here is the definition of 'establishment'...
Verb: Set up (an organization, system, or set of rules) on a firm or permanent basis.
Now here is the next flight controls engineering question...
Q: Why the F-111 and F-14 have no ailerons?
This is what we call a childish attitude.
Nobody is debating the above topic, but you are throwing the question to show off.
..........................................
What a loyal cheer leader you are
In other words, you have no idea what he asked at all. Just another evasion.
That is only your assumption.
Yes I did. In a private message. I want to see if you even understood what he was asking for.
Hahahaha
You are the one who like to show off, why dont you answer his question here so that all readers can read and thank you ?
I understand what he is asking.
But I want to see if you understand with what you are trying to explain first.
A composite material is composed of many different materials. Each of them can have different permissivity to allow penetration. Do you even understand what I just said?
I understand what you said.
Do you understand my point?
That your explanation is strange and not according to the science.
There is no semi transparent as you explain.
The semi transparent mean that part of the wave is going through the material.
The semi permissivity or semi transparent is not the one that make EM wave absorbed;
Yes I did. This is how you 'debate'. You have no technical education so you do not understand technical language. In response, all you can do is consistently accuse others of not explaining themselves.
Ok.
But your answer is wrong.
See my reply as the above.
To continue...
Q: What are the three principles of Engineering in order of establishments and priority?
Here is the definition of 'establishment'...
Verb: Set up (an organization, system, or set of rules) on a firm or permanent basis.
Now here is the next flight controls engineering question...
Q: Why the F-111 and F-14 have no ailerons?
Source:
http://www.defence.pk/forums/chines...ft-updates-discussions-183.html#ixzz24TdanumS
Dont be childish.
We are not debating these topics, just focus on topic we are debating, dont try to evade!