Deino
INT'L MOD
- Joined
- Nov 9, 2014
- Messages
- 12,780
- Reaction score
- 22
- Country
- Location
Seems a bit odd to go through a revamp for the entire fuselage, just for a smoke generator.
Agreed, but I don‘t have a better explanation at hand …
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Seems a bit odd to go through a revamp for the entire fuselage, just for a smoke generator.
Could be a bit of a stretch, but do you think it's possible, that the PLAAF is giving their airshow pilots the new jet, because they want more input on how it handles, compared to the previous design?Agreed, but I don‘t have a better explanation at hand …
They could stick that below the fuselage as it is for the standard jets - it really seems a “much ado about nothing” situationIn fact I don‘t know, but if I should guess, an oil tank for the smoke generator
View attachment 895494
Via @南部空军 from Weixin and @沉默的山羊 from Weibo
I wonder if it's testing in anticipation of a twin-seat variant of the J-10C. Thus far, we've only seen these spines on twin-seat J-10s and JF-17s.Another J-10CY was spotted and following no. 701 from mid-July, this appears to be 703?!
(Image via by78/SDF)
View attachment 894892