What a pull shit ( you just used it in your post, so you should know the meaning)you are. I just said to you I will stick to "But J-10B never used PESA; it used AESA from the day one."Dont' divert and recognize your error in the original point which, I remind once again what you said to @Deino, which is FALSE :
If you are so confident that I am wrong, then why don't you just man up for once and answer my question: did Mr.De say "“We did develope PESA. For instance, J-10 is equipted with PESA.”? Or is it true "Therefore, the only fighter that is equiped with PESA fire control radar ought to be J-10B"
I am sure will be able to come up with other excuses not to answer again. Please surprise me just for once, would you?
I can see you really enjoy making empty threats again and again. I already gave you my answer to all your ultimatums.
But if you want to continue this game, be sure that I'll be here. For the time being I've a lot of time to lose.
But it's ok, if it is too hard for you to read those kind of thing, I can understand.
Don't worry, this game can last for years... Ready ?
Henri K.
Very pleased to continue with you, young boy of 40 years-old... At least I got a lot of fun.
Well, I didn't want to end you up that quick, as you bring me a lot of fun
Have a good night, and see you next time for another funny topic.
As far as you didn't admit your initial error, our conversation can last for years and years. And I will remind in each conversation the same point.
Henri K.
And, as far as you didn't admit your initial error, our conversation can last for years and years. And I will remind in each conversation the same point.
Henri K.
You claimed that you receive and read all those professional articles in Chinese language daily; you even wrote a long reply in Chinese to prove you have an excellent Chinese language skills, and perhaps in a way to offer truce(I maybe wrong but you did give me some friendly advice and asked me whether I am a developer) ; But I think you Chinese sucks. You accused me adding new words "for instance" to my original translation of the caption words on the image( I did not put it in my original translation because I did not think it would have a material effect).
And I find you funny that you now try to protect yourself by adding a new word : "for instance".
Now tell me what did he say?
You and your fanboys are trying to portray some of us as a bunch of fanboys attacking you Chinese language skills when you point out the fact to us. But if you base all your arguments on the Chinese experts words in Chinses to against me, then of course I have to make sure you understand what is the true meaning of their sayings. Everybody lived in China knows government officials are very careful in using words - a different use of one particular word ( may have the same meaning in English) meaning very differently in some occasion - an delicate wording arts referred as eight part essay style八股文.
In this case Mr De did not say we developed PESA, he said we did PESA; he did not say J-10 is equipped with PESA, he said we used to use it on J-10. So if China studied those 2 PESA radars supplied by Russian and put it on J-10 for testing, He could say the exactly the same lines that "we did PESA, for instance J-10 used to use it"
So now you know why people like me challenging your Chinese language skills because you kept making silly statement about what Mr.De said that in fact he didn't say.
So, at least you admit the FACT that CETC had developped PESA ? So I accepted that you've recognized your initial error.
You can prove me wrong and make me admit my mistakes just by simply tell me when did he say we developed PESA, or just give me the bloody model name or images of this China-developed PESA.