wangrong
SENIOR MEMBER
- Joined
- Dec 16, 2008
- Messages
- 1,063
- Reaction score
- 0
Great question All Green. Anyone know if this is a possibility?
It's a Secret.
We should not stimulate some people
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Great question All Green. Anyone know if this is a possibility?
J10S is the twin seater; J10B is an improved version of J10A with extremely high thrust vector and maneuverability. We really dont have enough official info on J10b because the Chinese are very secretive but i have managed to find some info:
THE J-10B IS A HUGE UPGRADE OF THE J-10A WITH FEATURES SUCH AS:
- Thrust-vector control
- Extremely-high maneuverability
- Stealth DSI intakes
- More hardpoints
- AESA radar
- MUCH MUCH MORE
It entered service in 2007.
The J-10B lies on a WHOLE NEW GENERATION than the J-10A. It is much superior to the F-15 Eagle and the Eurofighter Typhoon. Pakistan will use the J-10B (which they call it the FC-20) and they said it was as good as a 5TH-GENERATION FIGHTER.
SPECIFICATIONS (J-10A):
- Speed: Mach 2.2
- g-limits: +9/-3 g (+88/-29 m/s², +290/-97 ft/s²
- Combat radius: 2,540 km (1,370 mi)
- Range (without refuelling): 3,400 km
- Service ceiling 20,000 m (65,600 ft)
- Wing loading: 335 kg/m² (64 lb/ft²
- Minimum thrust/weight:
- With afterburner: 0.98
- In-flight refuelling: Yes
- Thrust-vector-control: Yes
- Maneuverability: Extremely high
WEAPONS:
- Guns: 2× 23 mm internal cannon
- Hardpoints: 11, 3 under each wing and 5 under the fuselage
- Missiles:
- Air-to-air: PL-8, PL-9, PL-11, PL-12
- Air-to-surface: PJ-9, YJ-9K, 90 mm rockets
- Rocket launcher pods
- Bombs: laser-guided bombs (LT-2), glide bombs (LS-6) and unguided bombs
COMPARABLE TO:
- F-15E "Strike Eagle"
- Eurofighter "Typhoon"
- Sukhoi Su-30MKK "Flanker"
- Dassault "Rafale"
- F-16 "Falcon" (latest versions)
Air-Attack.com Videos :: J-10 FIGHTER: DEFINITION OF INVINCIBILITY
Ok this look all fancy, but how much reality is in it that remains debatable. Somehow i have my doubts. Frist DSI style intakes, i think this was debated earlier somewhere in this thread and most senior members were of an opinion that it was more of a fan boy concept then in reality, however i may be wrong on this one.
AESA radar is another thing i have my doubts, reason being that till today the only country with an effective working AESA radar was the US. Not even the french or the europeans could induct an AESA radar into their first batch of rafale and the EF. China has a long way to go. Pakistan was never really impressed by the Chinese made pulse doppler radars and our priority was always to find a western one, examples are the grifo-7 for F-7s and we still are searching for a western radar for JF-17 although we have the KLJ. So to expect an AESA radar in J-10 imo is farfetched.
Thrust vector control, now i know that a russian engine AL-31FN with thrust vectoring nozzle was demostrated in 2001 in paris airshow for the J-10 but it came with a cost, a cost what the Indian MKI faces, a very lower MTBO and a chinese copy of the same is still far from being finalized to be given the clearance for use in a single engine jet. Would PAF an already budget constraint airforce will go for something not cost effective at all and more over will require Russian permission. I kinda doubt. PAF doesnt seem to be too happy with the performance of the RD-93 either.
Sir jee its not easy to make an airplane from scratch its so easy to say rejected lol. U have no idea sir.
Ok take it this way then why did Pakistan wasted investment on jf-17 making a small jet then instead of making such a small jet they should have invested more on this plane and with Chinese cooperation designed and develop something like alleged FC-20 or something that might have seemed exact equal in size and if not exact replica of F-16. Atleast we would have delayed J-10 till that time to be matured. I am not saying JF-17 project is a blunder its a very wise project good Pakistan started this but i am really puzzled why did Pakistan not invested more to make this plane instead a light jet should have been developed in class of F-16 if Pakistan could invest 550 million though the real figure is around 675 million dollars had Pakistan invested 150 million dollars more and really enhanced its design it would have really be one hell of a fighter in Pakistan. Do you Agree with me on this or not?? though its my opinion if i was given this project i would have invested a lil more on this JF-17 and waited to get J-10s after 2012-2013. I strongly feel Pakistan should have made this JF-17 in the same class as F-16, if JF-17 with best avionics costs 25 million it would have cost us 29 million?? but look at this we would have a F-16 class fighter. JF-17 is not at all in the league of F-16 perhaps in future i am sure avionics will be in the league of F-16 or even better may be.
Sir jee its not easy to make an airplane from scratch its so easy to say rejected lol. U have no idea sir.
Ok take it this way then why did Pakistan wasted investment on jf-17 making a small jet then instead of making such a small jet they should have invested more on this plane and with Chinese cooperation designed and develop something like alleged FC-20 or something that might have seemed exact equal in size and if not exact replica of F-16. Atleast we would have delayed J-10 till that time to be matured. I am not saying JF-17 project is a blunder its a very wise project good Pakistan started this but i am really puzzled why did Pakistan not invested more to make this plane instead a light jet should have been developed in class of F-16 if Pakistan could invest 550 million though the real figure is around 675 million dollars had Pakistan invested 150 million dollars more and really enhanced its design it would have really be one hell of a fighter in Pakistan. Do you Agree with me on this or not?? though its my opinion if i was given this project i would have invested a lil more on this JF-17 and waited to get J-10s after 2012-2013. I strongly feel Pakistan should have made this JF-17 in the same class as F-16, if JF-17 with best avionics costs 25 million it would have cost us 29 million?? but look at this we would have a F-16 class fighter. JF-17 is not at all in the league of F-16 perhaps in future i am sure avionics will be in the league of F-16 or even better may be.
I think JF-17 is stealing the thunder of J-10 here
Bottom line is JF-17 will be a force to be reckoned with, mark my words.
So with that diversion lets get back to J-10 "the vigorous dragon" (feeling ignored).
waraich66 claims that J-10 is not being regarded by Chinese as their best Chinese plane.In current scenario where J-10 is the premier locally designed (not just manufactured) fighter and hundreds of which have been inducted; Please tell me what lead you to this conclusion?
Also i believe PAF has ordered 36 already and they do realize that it shall become a very very potent fighter.
Anything you heard contrary to this?
New Recruit
J11XX(after J11B)
This is an open secret, secret solution also needs some time
wangrong my friend.
I believe J-11 was upgraded version of SU-27
Whereas i think it would have been greatly enhanced by China, still it cannot be called a true breakthrough like J-10 which was the first high tech Chinese designed and manufactured aircraft.
That is why i said that i have heard nothing contrary to J-10 being the best Chinese fighter (from Chinese fighter i meant Chinese made).
Also what is J-11XX?
A newer version of J11?
Thanks.
may be new vision of su-30mki.made in chaina very good.