Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
But how much further lower can you take it? essentially a certain reduction can be achieved without changing the design characteristics e.g. DSI, RAM etc but for further reduction a redesign is necessary, like canted tails, shape change. Considering the current design would be optimized for performance, a redsign would mean modifying current equation and then re resolving it for optimum solution, a considerable labour and time consuming phenomenon in itself.it would be wise to lower fc20 's rcs and perhaps we would see the rumoured tech of diamond shaped frontal fuselage being moved over to fc20 aswell -- this might take some time and as a stop gap measure china might be giving 50jft blk2 rather quickly..
If that is would have been the case, then JFT approach would have been adopted i.e. implementing ongoing developments on continuous basis. It does not make sense to withhold a design just because of a consitant varible of technology. Rafale, Typhoon and NG all have taken the same path of induction of technologies on ongoing basis then why not FC-20If news such as JFT BlkII with redesign frontal nose cone is floating around then it could be possible for J-10B so far no clear images of that block. Parameters changes. The recent coming up upgrades of Rafale and Typhoon and Gripen NG upgrades could possibly have delayed the development and upgrades of J-10B which seems logical not to remain behind these technological superior strike fighters.
But J-10A production line are closed by CAC. And there isn't any news or leak about J-10b either. So we are in a lot of confusion right now about J-10b project. Hopefully things would clarify soon.
Rumored Display Unit for J-10B