SBD-3
ELITE MEMBER
- Joined
- Sep 19, 2008
- Messages
- 15,120
- Reaction score
- -9
- Country
- Location
aimarraul's avatar seems like oneAre there any supposed pictures of the fighters this article is referring to?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
aimarraul's avatar seems like oneAre there any supposed pictures of the fighters this article is referring to?
Good news,pupu said: PAF will have the Improvement Model J10.
Good news,pupu said: PAF will have the Improvement Model J10.
Do you have the Chinese source? I'll be happy to do another translation for our Pakistani bros.
一个是在目前已经试飞的歼-10某改进型号的基础上,换装目前正在研制中的国产某大推的单发先进多用途版本。这个版本很有意思,我曾经在斑竹PLA那里看到过非常详尽的介绍 。 . 611的意思,是要小巴按照FC-1的例子,投入近三倍的研制经费(全机航电系统)。 还有一个,是双发改进型号,这个型号不能多说,因为知道的太少Currently known, is put into the flight itself with Pakistan, the two programs. One is now a test flight of the F -10 improved model based on the dress up are being developed in the domestic push of a single large multi-purpose version of the advanced. This version is very interesting, I have seen in the owner PLA where a very detailed description 611 means to light in accordance with the FC-1's example, spent nearly three times the research funding (all aircraft avionics system). Another is the improvement of twin models, this model can not say much, because we know too little
Please translate Pupu's post 72 that seems interesting but not clearly translated though
一个是在目前已经试飞的歼-10某改进型号的基础上,换装目前正在研制中的国产某大推的单发先进多用途版本。这个版本很有意思,我曾经在斑竹PLA那里看到过非常详尽的介绍 。 . 611的意思,是要小巴按照FC-1的例子,投入近三倍的研制经费(全机航电系统)。 还有一个,是双发改进型号,这个型号不能多说,因为知道的太少
One is currently in a test flight of the F -10 basis of improved models, dress up currently being developed in the domestic push of a single large multi-purpose advanced version. This version is very interesting, I have seen in the owner PLA where a very detailed description. . 611 The meaning is to light in accordance with the FC-1's example, nearly three times the development of investment funds (all aircraft avionics system). Another is the improvement of twin models, this model can not say much, because we know too little
One is currently in a test flight of the F -10 basis of improved models, dress up currently being developed in the domestic push of a single large multi-purpose advanced version. This version is very interesting, I have seen in the owner PLA where a very detailed description. . 611 The meaning is to light in accordance with the FC-1's example, nearly three times the development of investment funds (all aircraft avionics system). Another is the improvement of twin models, this model can not say much, because we know too little
From my limited Chinese language skill, i think it meant an improved "Twin engine" version of J-10
一个是在目前已经试飞的歼-10某改进型号的基础上,换装目前正在研制中的国产某大推的单发先进多用途版本。这个版本很有意思,我曾经在斑竹PLA那里看到过非常详尽的介绍 。 . 611的意思,是要小巴按照FC-1的例子,投入近三倍的研制经费(全机航电系统)。还有一个,是双发改进型号,这个型号不能多说,因为知道的太少
finally someone good translation other than google translatorSorry fellahs I've been delayed!
One of the (variants) is based on a improved J-10 variant that has made successful testflights. This will be used to replace a certain Chinese made advanced single engined, multirole fighter. This variant is very interesting. I've seen detailed informations regarding this variant posted by the OP PLA. 611 wants to follow Pakistan's FC-1 example and spend three times the funds (*improved avionics?). I can't say much about the twin-engined variant because I don't know too much about it.
finally someone good translation other than google translator
after induction of BZ model what will be done of baseline A and S models...will they be exported or MLUed to BZ standards???
but with almost 300 J-10A/S already in PLAAF active service, Will PLAAF be willing to take this number to some 450,500+?.....coupled with J-11s and MKKs in service wouldn't it increase the maintainance burden significantly?....If this option is excercise PLAAF will go for hi-hi combinationI think the PLAAF will still operate the baseline J-10As for some time before upgrading or selling them considering that third gen. fighters like J-7s and J-8s still make up the bulk of the Chinese air force.
but with almost 300 J-10A/S already in PLAAF active service, Will PLAAF be willing to take this number to some 450,500+?.....coupled with J-11s and MKKs in service wouldn't it increase the maintainance burden significantly?....If this option is excercise PLAAF will go for hi-hi combination