What's new

Chengdu Aircraft Industry Group to produce 1,200 J-10 fighters

I dont know a nation which produces every thing by copying or by any technique, cant produces engine for so long we listning that they will produce ws-10 but still not.

What took them so long ?

btw any 1 tell when will they start production and when first batch available ?

Coming up with your own Jet Engine is not like making Samosa that easy. It takes time.

Jet Engine Development in China: Indigenous high-performance turbofans are a final step toward fully independent fighter production | China SignPost

China Could Make 5th Gen Engines By 2021
http://defensetech.org/2011/06/29/report-china-may-have-5th-gen-engine-tech-by-2021/
 
.
when Chinese af replace aging fighters ? and what is range of j-10 ?
 
.
I dont know a nation which produces every thing by copying or by any technique, cant produces engine for so long we listning that they will produce ws-10 but still not.

What took them so long ?

btw any 1 tell when will they start production and when first batch available ?

Dude, are you still living in 2003?

We live in 2013 right now, how we are not producing when there are many WS-10A engines more than hundred flankers and doing these supermaneuverable stunts?

[video]http://player.youku.com/player.php/sid/XNjExNzU2MDYw/v.swf[/video]
 
.
A "blitzkrieg" tactic is an umbrella term that is used to refer to an attack in which the aggressor attempts to overwhelm and capitulate the enemy by launching coordinated, multi-front, and most importantly, surprise assaults. Such requirements don't always include a freaking 10-hour artillery barrage like the Germans did during WWI or a Pearl Harbor style attack; any operation that catches the enemy off guard and manages to break through their defenses using surprise can be seen as such.

This means that the 1962 skirmish (it's not a full scale war since both sides restrained themselves) was in some respects similar to a blitzkrieg tactic, since the Chinese used coordinated mortar assaults in the opening front, but ultimately wasn't since India was expecting a counterattack after Indian troops were initially sent to occupy disputed territory.

But to say that the Chinese aren't considering the concept is simply ridiculous. First of all, after China extensively studied the Gulf War and such, the PLA embarked on a huge program to develop such weapons, such as long range cruise missiles (CJ-10, CJ-20, YJ-62, CM602G, YJ63, etc). They also developed the long range delivery mechanisms that would be needed to launch such "shock and we" assaults. Finally, their development and focus in stand off weapons seem to be in tandem with the notion that they are leaning towards the "shock and awe" tactic.

The notion that China doesn't plan on studying "blitzkrieg" tactics because they haven't done so is also erroneous. Every type of conflict calls for a different strategy and action. Just take a look at Vietnam and you'll see how "shock and awe" isn't always the way to go.

Sure, anyone can believe that China is "threatening" other countries when they turn a blind eye towards what caused the Chinese to react the way they did, such as Japan's unilateral purchase of the disputed islands.

Why waste your time with someone who possesses nothing but twisted logic? Similar to playing music to a bull?
 
.
Will all of these be for PLAAF or does this projection include sale to other countries also??
 
.
yearly budget has nothing to do with procuring budget. This budget is specially given to one of the branches by the government.
Navy should've got her share first then everyone else.

From what I know, the individual budgets also include things that the military may want to either R&D about, or procure. This is why military procurements and government procurements for the military are mentioned as separate things.
 
.
Dude, are you still living in 2003?

We live in 2013 right now, how we are not producing when there are many WS-10A engines more than hundred flankers and doing these supermaneuverable stunts?

[video]http://player.youku.com/player.php/sid/XNjExNzU2MDYw/v.swf[/video]

Why you bother to answer this Indian false flagger, when I read his post I know he the Indian troll.
 
.
Not easy to identify but im purely from Lahore , PK

just ask coz im angry with chinese why they dont make engine for jf 17 while its there machine who made iy
 
.
Not easy to identify but im purely from Lahore , PK

just ask coz im angry with chinese why they dont make engine for jf 17 while its there machine who made iy

Because it is the different engine made by a different Chinese company.

Just like why US is still making F-35 when they already got F-22. :coffee:
 
. . .

Pakistan Defence Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom