Chavez says US 'weapon' caused Haiti quake

[AstanoshKhan]

Venezuelan leader Hugo Chavez Wednesday accused the United States of causing the destruction in Haiti by testing a 'tectonic weapon' to induce the catastrophic earthquake that hit the country last week.

President Chavez said the US was "playing God" by testing devices capable of creating eco-type catastrophes, the Spanish newspaper ABC quoted him as saying.

A 7.0-magnitude quake rattled the desperately poor country on January 12, killing an estimated 100,000 to 200,000 people. As Haiti looks to the world for basic sustenance, the authorities say the biggest dangers facing survivors are untreated wounds and rising disease.

Following the quake, appeals for humanitarian aid were responded to globally. However, the nation is struggling with violence and looting as aid is still not enough for the tens of thousands left homeless and injured.

Chavez says US 'weapon' caused Haiti quake

----------------------------------

Either this Chavez guy is a big idiot or he knows something which we really don't?

 

[illuminatus]

That's one hell of a bold claim. What could Chavez gain out of making such an accusation? You just can never be sure about the truth. There is a very thin line between the truth and a lie.

 

[notsuperstitious]

One more joker with dictator ambitions. Is pally with other dictator regimes.

 

[illuminatus]

One more joker with dictator ambitions. Is pally with other dictator regimes.

Or is it because you beg to differ with his view? Why not give the guy some benefit of the doubt until proven false.

 

[pak-yes]

dictator ambitions

how you can say that??.he has the power of people and besides he lost a referendum a while back that granted him more powers and he accepted the will of people.Its the old weapon of some ppl(mainly US) to cry dictator to some one who's proves to be not favorable.

 

[third eye]

Venezuelan leader Hugo Chavez Wednesday accused the United States of causing the destruction in Haiti by testing a 'tectonic weapon' to induce the catastrophic earthquake that hit the country last week.

President Chavez said the US was "playing God" by testing devices capable of creating eco-type catastrophes, the Spanish newspaper ABC quoted him as saying.

A 7.0-magnitude quake rattled the desperately poor country on January 12, killing an estimated 100,000 to 200,000 people. As Haiti looks to the world for basic sustenance, the authorities say the biggest dangers facing survivors are untreated wounds and rising disease.

Following the quake, appeals for humanitarian aid were responded to globally. However, the nation is struggling with violence and looting as aid is still not enough for the tens of thousands left homeless and injured.

Chavez says US 'weapon' caused Haiti quake

----------------------------------

Either this Chavez guy is a big idiot or he knows something which we really don't?

I'll go with the 1st option.

There was an aftershock too, wonder who did that ?

 

[AstanoshKhan]

Mainstream media has done nothing but dumb us down.

Technology is 25 years ahead of what we know today. We believe everything we are told and therefore are hopelessly dependent on what the media tells us.

Turn your TV off for just 30 days and you'll understand where your brain went. There's nothing like the feeling of thinking for yourself.

 

[AstanoshKhan]

That's one hell of a bold claim. What could Chavez gain out of making such an accusation? You just can never be sure about the truth. There is a very thin line between the truth and a lie.

Ever heard of HAARP technology?

HIGH-FREQUENCY ACTIVE AURAL RESEARCH PROGRAM (HAARP)

HAARP IS A MASS DESTRUCTIVE WEAPON - NOT PART OF ANY NEGOTIATIONS

From a military standpoint, HAARP is a weapon of mass destruction. Potentially, it constitutes an instrument of conquest capable of selectively destabilizing agricultural and ecological systems of entire regions.

The above is an excerpt from the link below and a recommended read as a whole to explore to unknown destructive wonders.

H.A.A.R.P.

Happy reading...

 

[notsuperstitious]

Or is it because you beg to differ with his view? Why not give the guy some benefit of the doubt until proven false.

He's making an outrageous claim - a demonising claim. the onus of proof is on him, he's to prove his bold claim right, not the other way round.

 

[notsuperstitious]

how you can say that??.he has the power of people and besides he lost a referendum a while back that granted him more powers and he accepted the will of people.Its the old weapon of some ppl(mainly US) to cry dictator to some one who's proves to be not favorable.

Yes, he lost that referendum because the people saw through his plans to become a dectator through a referendum. That means he has dectator ambitions, whats wrong with that???

 

[Sravan]

I'll go with the 1st option.

There was an aftershock too, wonder who did that ?

Who else but israel

 

[karan.1970]

Or is it because you beg to differ with his view? Why not give the guy some benefit of the doubt until proven false.

So any non sensical claim made by anyone is entitled to benefit of doubt till proven false.. C'mon dude, does this mean that till the time Pakistan proves that US's claim of danger to pakistani nukes is false, US should get benefit of doubt on that claim??

I dont think so.. Do you??

 

[gambit]

Or is it because you beg to differ with his view? Why not give the guy some benefit of the doubt until proven false.

So any non sensical claim made by anyone is entitled to benefit of doubt till proven false.. C'mon dude, does this mean that till the time Pakistan proves that US's claim of danger to pakistani nukes is false, US should get benefit of doubt on that claim??

I dont think so.. Do you??

It is a logical fallacy that reverses the burden of proof to the skeptics. Basically...From now on, in these people's minds, EVERYTHING is possible, from Santa Claus to the gnome at the end of the rainbow, should be given the benefit of the doubt since they have YET to be disproved as false. Whenever anyone take this 'appeal to ignorance' position, it usually is more from a personal bias against one of the elements in the argument, which in this is the US, than it is from common sense and logical thinking.

 

[toxic_pus]

Or is it because you beg to differ with his view? Why not give the guy some benefit of the doubt until proven false.

O yea?

I have an invisible, green giraffe under my bed. Prove me wrong. Until then I am right.

 

[gambit]

O yea?

I have an invisible, green giraffe under my bed. Prove me wrong. Until then I am right.

Liar...!!! I used our super-duper HAARP antennas to bounce radio waves all over the world, focused in your bedroom and found that blow-up sex doll under your bed.