What's new

Chandrayaan-2: India to go it alone

Che Guevara

FULL MEMBER
Joined
Apr 13, 2011
Messages
914
Reaction score
0
Russia pulls out after one of its missions failed

India has decided to go it alone in its second lunar mission, the Chandrayaan-2, which was originally proposed as an Indo-Russian venture.

This was disclosed here on Monday by S.V.S. Murty of the Planetary Exploration Group of the Physical Research Laboratory (PRL), an institution under the Indian Space Research Organisation (ISRO) here.

Dr. Murty was speaking on India’s lunar and Mars missions at the ongoing workshop on exoplanets at the laboratory.

According to an agreement signed on November 12, 2007 between ISRO and Roskosmos, the Russian Federal Space Agency, ISRO had the primary responsibility to provide both the orbiter and the rover, while Roskosmos was to design and build the lander for this combined orbiter-rover-lander mission.

However, following the failure in December 2011 of Roskosmos’ Phobos-Grunt mission, there was a delay in the construction of the Russian lander.

The mission had a lander to return soil sample from the Martian satellite Phobos. This resulted in a complete review of technical aspects connected with the Phobos-Grunt mission, which were also used in the lunar projects such as the lander for Chandrayaan-2.

Due to this, as well as financial problems, the Russian agency apparently expressed its inability provide the lander to meet even the revised time frame of 2015 for the Chandrayaan-2 launch.

Dr. Murty stated that the cancellation of the Russian lander also meant that mission profile had to be marginally changed.

The design of the indigenous lander and the preliminary configuration study was completed by the Space Applications Centre (SAC), Ahmedabad, he said.

Chandrayaan-2 will have five primary payloads on the orbiter, two of which will be improvements on instruments that were onboard Chandrayaan-1.

In addition, the rover too will carry two additional instruments. Chandrayaan-2 will be launched by a GSLV powered by an indigenous cryogenic engine.

However, PRL director Jitendra Goswami clarified that this did not mean that the Indo-Russian collaboration on planetary exploration had ended. Since Chandrayaan-2 was intended to be Roskosmos’ Luna-Glob moon exploration programme, the Russian agency may join hands with ISRO in any of its lunar missions, Dr. Murty said.

The Hindu : News / National : Chandrayaan-2: India to go it alone
 
Russia pulls out after one of its missions failed


In addition, the rover too will carry two additional instruments. Chandrayaan-2 will be launched by a GSLV powered by an indigenous cryogenic engine.

[/url]

that is bad news
 
stay on topic. im just stating facts. gslv has the worst record of all of India's space launchers. why would anyone want to take risk with this kind of high prestige project? lol
 
stay on topic. im just stating facts. gslv has the worst record of all of India's space launchers. why would anyone want to take risk with this kind of high prestige project . lol

Because only tiny minds think it is about prestige . It is about scientific research . Last time we discovered moon on water .

With the kind of attitude you have you will never achieve any success in life because of your fear of failure .

Maybe we will fail . But we will come back up and try again and again till we are successful .

ISRO was not built in a day . It has decades of space faring experience .

And Failure and success are two side of any coin .

On the other hand not trying is NOT .
 
Wonder why ISRO decided to go with the Russians on the first place?? The Chandrayaan 1 mission was our indigenous effort with some foreign payloads on board. Since we had already built an orbiter in the first lunar mission, the next logical step would have been to built a lander indigenously, this should have been done otherwise Chandrayaan 2 doesn't give us any advancement in deep space missions as we were once again building the ORBITER in this case & lander was being made by the Russians. But it's better late than never & now ISRO can get back to work without worrying for the Russians.

P.S. @ indians pls don't reply to the malaysian troll, if i m not wrong than he is Nan Yang in new avatar, has a good history of trolling ISRO related threads.
 
stay on topic. im just stating facts. gslv has the worst record of all of India's space launchers. why would anyone want to take risk with this kind of high prestige project? lol

Not every flight is same - and this is the universal fact.
Now coming to yr point.
When GSLV crumbled on its own weight, Indians did find what went wrong.
Besides, do you know the Kilowise difference of GSLV's payload now and before?

Excuse me?

You are excused!
 

It says NASA found water, India just supplied the payload. However what I think the other poster are saying is in less than uncertain terms, is the money spent on this project the best way to spend government funds based on national priorities?


I also agree with this, not just because of India socioeconomic status, but governments shouldn't be spending tax money on space programs, that should be reserved for the private sector. I'm yet to see NASA get an ROI on their discovery of water on the moon.
 
It says NASA found water, India just supplied the payload. However what I think the other poster are saying is in less than uncertain terms, is the money spent on this project the best way to spend government funds based on national priorities?


I also agree with this, not just because of India socioeconomic status, but governments shouldn't be spending tax money on space programs, that should be reserved for the private sector. I'm yet to see NASA get an ROI on their discovery of water on the moon.

NASA supplied the instrument, the hardest part is crashing the probe on the moon's surface which India did.

When they mention space mission they will say India's Chandrayan 1 found water on the moon, credit will be given to the mission name and launch platform.
 
that's reserve for countries with a lot money to burn only. majority of indians still have no access to toilet you cannot afford to do like them. sorry, have to bring in the toilet talk. :lol: this is space we're talking here, not like any other types of failures. it costs a lot. a lot of toilets can be bough for poor injuns..

Is your brain capable of understanding that the ISRO budget is so ridiculously small compared to the money we have?
Its not a problem of money.
 
Back
Top Bottom