What's new

Chairman Imran Khan is not Anti America, PTI USA leader Atif Khan tells Congressman Adam Schiff

This was IK's stance only after he was on the same page with the same establishment, and after he claimed he was ousted by the Americans. More spaghetti than stance, depending on what suited him at the moment. :D



Do you mean that IK is just as evil as how USA is seen to be evil on PDF?
so on topic, IK is anti US?
 
so on topic, IK is anti US?

Only when it suits him in misleading his followers, just like when he was on the same page until he was not. Utterly untrustworthy with no principles at all, and therefore the same as all the rest that he declares as such. Suicide or go to IMF? And so many more examples.
 
And last year we were supposed to bring a revolution with anti American sentiments peddled by these same folks. Unbelievable.
Revolution was meant to be against American puppets and chaprasis in Pakistan not Americans themselves.
 
Last edited:
Only when it suits him in misleading his followers, just like when he was on the same page until he was not. Utterly untrustworthy with no principles at all, and therefore the same as all the rest that he declares as such. Suicide or go to IMF? And so many more examples.
I asked about being anti US or not and what specifically qualifies him? You are taking the IMF statement literally here! Most politicians make such exaggerated promises and claims: we see Shabaz sharif promising to sell his clothes, dragging Zardari on streets, Trump building a wall, Obama closing gitmo and promises of bringing troops home, Biden … I dont know he even knows where he is. etc. Those issues are irrelevant.
 
Most politicians make such exaggerated promises and claims: we see Shabaz sharif promising to sell his clothes, dragging Zardari on streets,

So you mean that IK is no different than all those he derides, which is what I have always maintained.
 
So you mean that IK is no different than all those he derides, which is what I have always maintained.
Arent others also doing the same at some level? As a politician they all will exhibit specific common traits - and revolutionary slogans is one of them. People know this too, and then judge them through elections - thats how democracy works.
Anyway question was about him being anti USA? is he?
 
Arent others also deriding everyone else? As a politician they all will exhibit specific traits - and dreamy and revolutionary slogans is one of them. Anyway question was about him being anti USA? is he?

So he is just like all the other politicians he derides, no more and no less. And therefore his anti-US stance is just as much of a farce as all the others too. Blaming USA in public, trying to backtrack in private. Sadly typical.
 
So he is just like all the other politicians he derides, no more and no less. And therefore his anti-US stance is just as much of a farce as all the others too. Blaming USA in public, trying to backtrack in private. Sadly typical.
My question was different- is he anti US or not?
 
As I answered, his anti-USA is a farce, similar to all the others. He blames USA in public, then tries to backtrack in private.
Ok so what qualifies him to be anti USA? Did he chant Death of America or burn Biden’s effigy etc? Whether its a farce, or his similarity to break promises like other politicians, or not having committed suicide yet after going to IMF etc. are all very important but separate issues.
 
Ok so what qualifies him to be anti USA? Did he chant Death of America or burn Biden’s effigy etc?

Is it a requirement to chant Death to America or burn Biden's effigy to qualify as being anti-US?
 
Is it a requirement to chant Death to America or burn Biden's effigy to qualify as being anti-US?
Those were just some potential examples. I am basically trying to gauge your view on IK being anti USA. So what exactly qualifies him?
 
Those were just some potential examples. I am basically trying to gauge your view on IK being anti USA. So what exactly qualifies him?

I personally think he is not. He just panders to whatever suits his political goals of the moment. That is about all.
 
PTI very much mirrors Aam Aadmi Paarty(AAP) with Imran mirroring Kejriwal a lot. Both started a corruption crusader, tries all tricks in the political books to stay in power while at the same time blaming everyone around them. They also have the habit of U turning on their words. Don't know about PTI, but AAP used to include any one (corrupt or not) in their party to win power(which is what all parties do), but they are the only only one who claim to be 'doodh ka dhula hua'. Also, rest of the party doesn't matter in front of Kejriwal, which is what I have deduced for Imran as well, from my time on this forum. But at the end of the day, they seem to be less corrupt that their peers for sure with some tangible offerings. Interestingly both are populist leaders, who believe in giving freebies. Quite fascinating.
 
Built whole of his haqeeqi azadi narrative against US for so called "Regime Change" and after a year he is all buddy with the same US.

Kya hum koi ghulam hain !! Oh well..
 

Pakistan Defence Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom