Centre plans 'carnival' to mark 50 years of India-Pakistan War of 1965

[pakdefender]

Actually Pakistan lost the war by any standard used to compare.

It started the war to capture land and ended up losing more land to India. Pakistan Army was beaten hollow, it had to keep retreating giving more land to India.

Pakistan actually gained land , Chamb was captured in 1965

but what about Kashmir ? , did you won that sir' ? as this was the very objective of the war ,
if not then how did you win a war by starting it with an offensive operation Gibraltar & ending with a defensive one @ Lahore ? i can understand that these are some very hard but , also some very real & logical questions nonetheless , rants don't run in the real world , Logic does , so i ask again what is the logic behind your claim ?

Not only did Pakistan successfully defended and beat back the enemy advance but it also captured and held on ( did not return ) areas taken from the enemy on the Kashmir front.

 

[tested]

Pakistan actually gained land , Chamb was captured in 1965

Not only did Pakistan successfully defended and beat back the enemy advance but it also captured and held on ( did not return ) areas taken from the enemy on the Kashmir front.

Sigh...I hate having to give out information that can be accessed easily by google.

By the end of the war India had lost (to Pakistan):
540 km2 (210 mi2) of territory lost (primarily in Rann of Kutch)

By the end of the war, Pakistan had lost (to India):
Over 1,840 km2 (710 mi2) of territory lost (primarily in Sialkot, Lahore, and Kashmir sectors)

Use the source references given here as a start
Indo-Pakistani War of 1965 - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia


Now any competent army that starts a war is expected to win more territory than it looses. Apparently these things don't apply to Pakistan Army which lost more land to India in a war it started to gain land(kashmir)

 

[Mr.Nair]

Pakistan actually gained land , Chamb was captured in 1965

Not only did Pakistan successfully defended and beat back the enemy advance but it also captured and held on ( did not return ) areas taken from the enemy on the Kashmir front.

Fake victory declaration of pakistan as per your defence minister in your media

 

[pakdefender]

Sigh...I hate having to give out information that can be accessed easily by google.

By the end of the war India had lost (to Pakistan):
540 km2 (210 mi2) of territory lost (primarily in Rann of Kutch)

By the end of the war, Pakistan had lost (to India):
Over 1,840 km2 (710 mi2) of territory lost (primarily in Sialkot, Lahore, and Kashmir sectors)

Use the source references given here as a start
Indo-Pakistani War of 1965 - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia


Now any competent army that starts a war is expected to win more territory than it looses. Apparently these things don't apply to Pakistan Army which lost more land to India in a war it started to gain land(kashmir)

Now there is a Pakistani brigade head quarter in Chamb and indians were wiped out in that region during 1965 and further in 1971 war as well

Editing wikipedia entries will not change anything so tell me what is Modi going to do about Chmab during the war carnival , what story will he cook up to cover for this loss

 

[tested]

Now there is a Pakistani brigade head quarter in Chamb and indians were wiped out in that region during 1965 and further in 1971 war as well

Editing wikipedia entries will not change anything so tell me what is Modi going to do about Chmab during the war carnival , what story will he cook up to cover for this loss

Huh?
You are aware that I am talking about the entire war over all the fronts, not one sector right?

Thats like saying because the Germans won one particular area in WW2, they won the war.

Pakistan lost way way more land to India than it could capture. And considering that Pakistan started the war in the first place to capture land, the fact that it ended up losing more land to India is practically humiliating.

 

[pakdefender]

Huh?
You are aware that I am talking about the entire war over all the fronts, not one sector right?

Thats like saying because the Germans won one particular area in WW2, they won the war.

Pakistan lost way way more land to India than it could capture. And considering that Pakistan started the war in the first place to capture land, the fact that it ended up losing more land to India is practically humiliating.

You did not address my question , here it is again

What will Modi do about Chamb which india lost in 1965, admit that india lost territory to Pakistan or pander to the unwashed Hindutva supporters the lie that india "won" ?

For the carnival , apart from a dummy indian general having tea at Lahore , modi can also add make belief indian presence in Chamb

Also what areas that india captured in 1965 that it was able to establish military control over it and has it even today ? give example

 

[tested]

You did not address my question , here it is again

What will Modi do about Chamb which india lost in 1965, admit that india lost territory to Pakistan or pander to the unwashed Hindutva supporters the lie that india "won" ?

For the carnival , apart from a dummy indian general having tea at Lahore , modi can also add make belief indian presence in Chamb

Also what areas that india captured in 1965 that it was able to establish military control over it and has it even today ? give example

You have got to be daft!
I just gave you statistics on what India captured as a whole and what Pakistan lost as a whole and you are going on and on about one sector!

 

[pakdefender]

You have got to be daft!
I just gave you statistics on what India captured as a whole and what Pakistan lost as a whole and you are going on and on about one sector!

What place , TODAY , is part of indian territory that in 1965 was part of Pakistan

Like Chamb was illegally occupied by india till 1965 , until we liberated it