What's new

Centre Decides on 20,000-cr Makeover for Army Air Arm

Akash Surface-to-Air Missile (SAM) System
The Akash (sky) is a mid-range surface-to-air missile (SAM) system being built by India's state-owned Defence Research and Development Organisation (DRDO).
1l-image.jpg
2l-image.jpg
3l-image.jpg
akash1.jpg

The Hawk family of aircraft, manufactured by BAE Systems, has been made famous by the Red Arrows Royal Air Force Aerobatic Team.

The missile is being developed under the integrated guided-missile development programme (IGMDP). The programme also involved development of the Nag, Agni and Trishul missiles, as well as the Prithvi ballistic missile.

Two versions of the missile are being built for the Indian Air Force (IAF) and the Indian Army (IA). The first batch of the Akash missiles for the IA is expected to be rolled out by September 2012. The first Akash missile was delivered to the IAF inMarch 2012. Deliveries to the IAF are expected to be concluded in 2015.

The IAF has ordered 1,000 Akash missiles and the IA 2,000 missiles. The orders from the IAF are anticipated to increase if the Indo-Israeli joint venture to develop a MRSAM (medium range SAM) is put on hold.

The Indian Defence Acquisition Council (DAC) ordered INR125bn ($2.8bn) of the army version Akash missile system in June 2010.

In May 2012, the Indian Air Force successfully test-fired Akash from the Integrated Test Range (ITR) at Chandipur, Orissa, India. The missile has since been successfully test fired in ripple mode against a floating object launched by a pilotless target aircraft in May 2014.

Features of the mid-range surface-to-air missile system
"The Indian Defence Acquisition Council (DAC) ordered INR125bn ($2.8bn) of the army version Akash missile system in June 2010."
The Akash SAM system can employ multiple air targets while operating in fully autonomous mode.

The system features a launcher, a missile, a control centre, an integral mission guidance system, a multifunctional fire control radar, a system arming and explosion mechanism, a digital autopilot, C4I (command, control communication and intelligence) centres and supporting ground equipment.

The group control centre (GCC) acts as command and control headquarters for the SAM system.

Each Akash battery includes four 3D passive electronically scanned array (PESA) radars and four self-propelled launchers with three missiles each, all of which are interconnected. It also has battery level radar known as the Rajendra radar and a battery control centre. It can track and attack multiple targets concurrently. A self-destructive device is also integrated into the missile.

The Akash system protects a moving procession of vehicles using an electronic counter countermeasures (ECCM) system. Akash was also tested in ballistic missile role and offers air defence missile coverage of 2,000 square kilometres.

Flexible deployment and multitarget area defence capabilities of Akash
Akash missiles are designed to be launched from static or mobile platforms, including battle tanks and wheeled trucks, providing flexible deployment. It can handle multiple targets and destroy manoeuvring targets, such as unmanned aerial vehicles, fighter aircraft, cruise missiles and missiles launched from helicopters.

The missile is capable of destroying aircraft within the range of 30km to 35km and at altitudes up to 18,000m. It renders multidirectional and multitarget area defence. It can carry conventional and nuclear warheads weighing up to 60kg. The integration of nuclear warhead allows the missile to destroy aircraft as well as warheads released from ballistic missiles. It can operate in all weather conditions.

Development timeline and tests at the Integrated Test Range in Chandipur
Development of the Akash missile began in 1983. The maiden trial firings were carried out in 1990. Developmental trials were conducted until March 1997. The missile was demonstrated for target interception capability against two live aerial targets in November 2005. Around 16 trial firings were conducted by August 2006.

The test firing of the Akash for the IAF was carried out at the Integrated Test Range in Chandipur, Orissa, in December 2007. The IAF rolled out its indigenous SAM system in 2008 upon completion of nine successful field trials.

Development of an advanced version, Akash Mk-II, began in June 2010. The Mk-II version is expected to be ready for a maiden fire trial by 2013.

Rajendra radar details and propulsion of the DRDO's missile system
The air force version of the Rajendra radar is capable of tracking 64 targets within a range of 60km in range, azimuth and height.

"The missile is being developed under the integrated guided-missile development programme (IGMDP)."
The army variation of the Akash will use Rajendra radar which can track 40 targets in range and azimuth with up to 100km in tracking range.

The 3D central acquisition radar (CAR) is a long range surveillance radar which warns the GCC by tracking 200 targets in track while scan (TWS) mode from a tracking range of 150km. It measures azimuth, range and height of targets, and transmits to the GCC via communication links.

The GCC sends the target position information to the battery level radar (Rajendra).

The Akash is powered by Ramjet-rocket propulsion system which renders thrust for the missile to intercept the target at supersonic speed without any retardation.

Key players involved with India's Akash (sky) SAM development project
Akash can fly at supersonic speeds ranging from Mach 2.8 to 3.5.

The kill probability of the missile is 88% and can be increased to 98.5% by launching the second missile after five seconds of launching the first.

The Akash SAM system was produced by Bharat Electronics (BEL). Bharat Dynamics (BDL) serves as nodal agency for Akash SAM production for the army.

A number of DRDO labs are involved in the development of the Akash. DRDL is responsible for system integration and missile development. LRDE Bangalore manufactured the Rajendra radar. R&DE Pune developed the launcher.

The tracked vehicles were manufactured by CVRDE. ARDE built the nuclear warhead while HEMRL produced the propellants. Launcher systems were provided by Tata Power and Larsen & Toubro.


 
.
Look at the number of aircrafts and the area we fly and the number of sorties that we fly. The argument like these are worthless. There is absolutely no way to compare the pilots of two nations in whole. And your refusal to turn off the caps lock shows you are a die hard troll, possibly a false flag too.
say someone with Indian flags and an Arab child
 
.
HOW YOU SEEN THE SIZE OF IT... THR RCS OF THE AIRCRAFT IS TERRIBLE IT WILL POP ON OUR RADARS AS SOON As it takes off

OOOMYYYGAWWWWDD !!!! WHAT DOES PAF FLY ? FIGHTER MOSQUITOS ?

GO HOME KID. AND GOOD THAT YOU LEARNED THE LESSON THAT TALKING WITHOUT CAPS LOCK MAKES IT LOOK BETTER.

LAANTON KE BHOOT BAATON SE KAHAN MAANTEY HAI ?
 
.
Video showing capability of Akash weapon System
 
.
we had superior planes then?
i suppose if we have a war, and then we shoot down your planes, what are the chances they would would again be saying "PAF had better planes than the IAF, oh lawd would you look at that how could the IAF even respond to giants like the F 16 and Jf 17"
:D LAWL


not cool

Yes you did, also the AIM-9s PAF used were far-far superior to anything India had back then.
Well, when that happens if it ever happens at all, you can come back back and tell me "I told you so". But then again we'll have won the war.
Rather you should ponder how could PAF respond to Mig-29s and Su-30s all superior in specs and numbers to F-16s and JF-17s.
 
.
Yes you did, also the AIM-9s PAF used were far-far superior to anything India had back then.
Well, when that happens if it ever happens at all, you can come back back and tell me "I told you so". But then again we'll have won the war.
Rather you should ponder how could PAF respond to Mig-29s and Su-30s all superior in specs and numbers to F-16s and JF-17s.

Indian resources have naturally refuted and denied PAF air superiority over the FIVE times larger IAF in the 65 and 71 wars. Indian and Pakistani claims and counter claims are pointless on this subject as they tend to be biased and blurred with nationalism. The only way to assess this is through the neutral and qualified international opinion, which has now become aviation history. Check out autobiography of Gen. Chuck Yeagers (yes, the one who broke the sound barrier), who 'refereed' the 1971 war and flew up and down the region collecting wreckage of IAF aircraft shot down by the PAF. Here is what he says, "the Pakistanis scored a three-to-one kill ratio knocking out 102 Indian jets and losing 34 of their own. I am certain about the figures because I went out several times a day in a chopper and counted the wrecks below. I counted wrecks, documented them by serial numbers, identified the components such as engines and rocket pods" Now he is not exactly a Pakistani, is he? Check out the following world reputed aviation journals. USA - Aviation week & space technology - December 1968 issue. "For the PAF, the 1965 war was as climatic as the Israeli victory over the Arabs in 1967. A further similarity was that Indian air power had an approximately 5:1 numerical superiority at the start of the conflict. Unlike the Middle East conflict, the Pakistani air victory was achieved to a large degree by air-to-air combat rather than on ground. But it was as absolute as that attained by Israel. UK - Air International - November - 1991 " the average PAF pilot is almost certainly possessed of superior skills when compared with, say, an average American pilot. As to those who are rated above average, they compare favourably to the very best " Encyclopaedia of Aircraft printed in several countries by Orbis publications - Volume 5 "Pakistan's air force gained a remarkable victory over India in this brief 22 day war exploiting its opponents weaknesses in exemplary style - Deeply shaken by reverse, India began an extensive modernisation and training program, meanwhile covering its defeat with effective propaganda smoke screen. If you feel more at ease with German and French, then also checkout the followings Air Action (France) December 1988 and January 1989 Flugzeug (Germany) February (2) 1989 In addition to this, PAF put on show for inspection, its entire fleets after BOTH of the wars in presence of world dignitaries and aviation community. The five times bigger IAF should have annihilated the tiny PAF to prevent such displays!!!!!! Now these are FACTS - what rides on a wave of nationalism is just fiction.
 
. . . . .
Indian resources have naturally refuted and denied PAF air superiority over the FIVE times larger IAF in the 65 and 71 wars. Indian and Pakistani claims and counter claims are pointless on this subject as they tend to be biased and blurred with nationalism. The only way to assess this is through the neutral and qualified international opinion, which has now become aviation history. Check out autobiography of Gen. Chuck Yeagers (yes, the one who broke the sound barrier), who 'refereed' the 1971 war and flew up and down the region collecting wreckage of IAF aircraft shot down by the PAF. Here is what he says, "the Pakistanis scored a three-to-one kill ratio knocking out 102 Indian jets and losing 34 of their own. I am certain about the figures because I went out several times a day in a chopper and counted the wrecks below. I counted wrecks, documented them by serial numbers, identified the components such as engines and rocket pods" Now he is not exactly a Pakistani, is he? Check out the following world reputed aviation journals. USA - Aviation week & space technology - December 1968 issue. "For the PAF, the 1965 war was as climatic as the Israeli victory over the Arabs in 1967. A further similarity was that Indian air power had an approximately 5:1 numerical superiority at the start of the conflict. Unlike the Middle East conflict, the Pakistani air victory was achieved to a large degree by air-to-air combat rather than on ground. But it was as absolute as that attained by Israel. UK - Air International - November - 1991 " the average PAF pilot is almost certainly possessed of superior skills when compared with, say, an average American pilot. As to those who are rated above average, they compare favourably to the very best " Encyclopaedia of Aircraft printed in several countries by Orbis publications - Volume 5 "Pakistan's air force gained a remarkable victory over India in this brief 22 day war exploiting its opponents weaknesses in exemplary style - Deeply shaken by reverse, India began an extensive modernisation and training program, meanwhile covering its defeat with effective propaganda smoke screen. If you feel more at ease with German and French, then also checkout the followings Air Action (France) December 1988 and January 1989 Flugzeug (Germany) February (2) 1989 In addition to this, PAF put on show for inspection, its entire fleets after BOTH of the wars in presence of world dignitaries and aviation community. The five times bigger IAF should have annihilated the tiny PAF to prevent such displays!!!!!! Now these are FACTS - what rides on a wave of nationalism is just fiction.

Not 5 times larger just double the size

Combat-Aircraft-Strength-IA.jpg


And Mig-21 did not have IOC at that time so did not see action anyways
 
.
Yes you did, also the AIM-9s PAF used were far-far superior to anything India had back then.
Well, when that happens if it ever happens at all, you can come back back and tell me "I told you so". But then again we'll have won the war.
Rather you should ponder how could PAF respond to Mig-29s and Su-30s all superior in specs and numbers to F-16s and JF-17s.
The Sunday Tribune - Spectrum

Indian Air Force Losses -1965 War

IAF lost 75 aircraft in 1965 war

25 in combat ( including shot down by AA )

37 lost by PAF raids on airbases and aircraft parked in open
use a neural sources not an Indian one i wont use a Pakistan sources as well
 
.
Yes you did, also the AIM-9s PAF used were far-far superior to anything India had back then.
Well, when that happens if it ever happens at all, you can come back back and tell me "I told you so". But then again we'll have won the war.
Rather you should ponder how could PAF respond to Mig-29s and Su-30s all superior in specs and numbers to F-16s and JF-17s.
we will see
 
.
. .
Back
Top Bottom