What's new

Centre collects revenue from south, spends on north: Andhra Chief Minister Chandrababu Naidu

@pothead @protest @danger007 @randomradio

I dont know what to say about the dimwits of Andhra Pradesh.

This is Revenue Collection along with Central Support to Andhra Pradesh.

What is going on in Andhra Pradesh is only POLITICS.

Just look at the INCREASE IN GRANTS from CENTER to Andhra Pradesh. Still these dimwits are crying.

https://www.thenewsminute.com/artic...-improved-its-revenue-after-bifurcation-58907

The AP growth story: How the state considerably improved its revenue after bifurcation
The question is whether the revenue growth will sustain, and how to add the revenue capacity to the state.
Share @Facebook Share @twitter Share @Email Share @google+ Share @reddit


chandrababu-naidu.jpg

Following the bifurcation of Andhra Pradesh in 2014, the newly-formed state of Andhra Pradesh comprising coastal Andhra and Rayalseema regions was faced with a major challenge: Hyderabad, the major source of revenue for united AP went to Telangana, and newly-formed AP had to figure out how to generate enough revenue and survive as an independent state. And if the AP budget 2017-18 is anything to go by, CM Chandrababu Naidu and his team seem to have done a good job of improving the revenue.

Before we review the revenue performance of Andhra Pradesh from Budget FY2017–18, it is worth recollecting this statement by Yanamala Ramakrishnudu, the Finance Minister of Andhra Pradesh during the FY 2015–16 Budget Speech.

“The State continues to reel under revenue deficit and this deficit continues even after the last year of the award of 14th Finance Commission. Our debt burden and fiscal deficit will continue to increase as we keep borrowing to meet revenue expenditure. This provides an understanding of how the state has been handling revenue deficit and fiscal deficit. In a financial year, revenue deficit occurs when the revenue expenditure is higher than the revenue receipts. Fiscal deficit, on the other hand, is the difference between the total expenditure and total receipts (including the borrowings), and is usually referred to as the percentage of Gross Domestic Product (GDP) at and Gross State Domestic Product (GSDP) for a state.”

After three budgets, the current dispensation in the state has made efforts to bring down revenue deficit while containing fiscal deficit within the limits. From an estimated Rs. 14,242 crores (2.72% of GSDP) in FY 2014–15, the revenue deficit, estimated to be a mere Rs. 416 crores (0.05% of GSDP) by the end of FY 2017–18, is a significant progress in improving the state’s finances.

Similarly, the fiscal deficit target is set at 3% of GSDP during FY 2017–18; it was 3.88% of GSDP in FY 2014–15. While the revenue deficit and fiscal deficit targets for FY2017–18 look optimistic, it remains to be seen how the state manages to achieve this turnaround within three years, especially the revenue deficit.

The decline in revenue deficit indicates an increase in revenue of the state, and thus requires an understanding of the revenue performance since the state was dismembered.

Revenue%20deficit.jpg


Revenue Deficit and Fiscal Deficit (as Nominal values and % of GSDP). Source: http://www.apfinance.gov.in

Revenue Performance of Andhra Pradesh (FY 2014–18)

State revenues constitute two components — the state’s own revenues and transfers from the Union of India. State’s own revenues come from tax revenues through commercial taxes, registrations and stamps charges, and excise duty — and non-tax revenues are generated from general, social and economic services.

The transfers from the Union of India are through grants, and tax devolutions. A change in these components will indicate whether the revenues are growing or declining.

State’s own revenue

Between the FY 2014–15 and FY 2015–16, the state’s own tax revenues increased by 33.67% — with above ₹40,000 crores as a possibility — and is predicted to increase steadily.

The major contributors to own tax revenues are stamps and registration fees, state excise duties, taxes on sales, trade etc., and taxes on vehicles — each of them increased by 37.73%, 20.43%, 34.29%, and 46.33% respectively. Interestingly, the state is planning to increase revenues from taxes and duties on electricity.

AP%20revenues.jpg


Andhra Pradesh State’s Own Revenues (in Crores). Source: http://www.apfinance.gov.in

The non-tax revenue saw huge decline of 39.86% from FY 2014–15 to FY 2015–16, but stabilised at ₹4,000 crores, and can expect an incremental growth. In FY 2015–16 Budget Speech, the Finance Minister emphasised on increasing the state’s own non-tax revenue.

We have plans to explore possibilities of increasing non-tax revenues as it will not impose any tax burden on the people. We have already engaged experts for this purpose. We are also in the process of studying the excise policy of Tamil Nadu to see whether there is any lesson to learn.

To increase the state’s own tax revenues, the government of Andhra Pradesh has invested heavily in Information Technology, strict enforcement of Aadhar based registrations, improving transparency levels, and eradicating illicit distillations. These initiatives are expected to reap benefits and increase the revenues to the state.

Perhaps, due to lower levels of industrialisation, and urbanisation, Andhra Pradesh has low tax-GSDP ratio compared to the neighbouring states. The 14th Finance Commission projected tax-GSDP ratio as 7.98% for FY 2015–16, and 8.41% by FY 2019–20. Efforts to increase the tax base will help increase revenues.

Transfers from the Union of India

The tax devolution from the Union of India has increased by 91.32% from FY 2014–15 to FY 2015–16, and is expected to grow steadily. While the increase in taxes is promising, the larger share of the grants-in-aid from the Union of India — over 50% of total Union transfers, and nearly 25% of the total revenues of the state — is a challenge in the long-term.

Based on the Andhra Pradesh State Reorganisation Act, 2014, the 14th Finance Commission suggested revenue deficit gap to the state till FY 2019–20, and this component in grants-in-aid will end from FY 2020–21. The budget estimate of grants-in-aid for FY 2017–18 is higher than the actuals of FY 2015–16 and the revised estimates of FY 2016–17.

The state has two years before the Union of India stops transferring the revenue deficit grant to the state. While the expectation of more grants till FY2019–20 is justified, the continuation of the same trend will pose challenges to any dispensation in 2019.

Union%20transfers%20of%20AP.jpg


Union Transfers and Total Revenues (in Crores) of Andhra Pradesh. Source: http://www.apfinance.gov.in

Despite several challenges in revenue generation, the government of Andhra Pradesh and the Union of India have managed to tap the maximum revenues from the 13 districts of the state. FY 2017–18 is the third consecutive financial year for the dismembered Andhra Pradesh, and achieving this year’s targets of revenue deficit and fiscal deficit provides a better outlook on the revenue generation capabilities of the state.

The question is whether the revenue growth will sustain, and how to add the revenue capacity to the state.

Public investments, urbanisation, the size of manufacturing and commercial sectors (industrialisation), and openness of the economy are key components of revenue capacity of the state. The onus is on both the state government and the Union of India to strengthen the revenue base, improve revenue generation and financial situation of Andhra Pradesh.

The author is a volunteer with The Takshashila Institution - An independent networked think tank on India's strategic affairs.
 
.
@pothead @protest @danger007 @randomradio

I dont know what to say about the dimwits of Andhra Pradesh.

This is Revenue Collection along with Central Support to Andhra Pradesh.

What is going on in Andhra Pradesh is only POLITICS.

Just look at the INCREASE IN GRANTS from CENTER to Andhra Pradesh. Still these dimwits are crying.

https://www.thenewsminute.com/artic...-improved-its-revenue-after-bifurcation-58907

The AP growth story: How the state considerably improved its revenue after bifurcation
The question is whether the revenue growth will sustain, and how to add the revenue capacity to the state.
Share @Facebook Share @twitter Share @Email Share @google+ Share @reddit


chandrababu-naidu.jpg

Following the bifurcation of Andhra Pradesh in 2014, the newly-formed state of Andhra Pradesh comprising coastal Andhra and Rayalseema regions was faced with a major challenge: Hyderabad, the major source of revenue for united AP went to Telangana, and newly-formed AP had to figure out how to generate enough revenue and survive as an independent state. And if the AP budget 2017-18 is anything to go by, CM Chandrababu Naidu and his team seem to have done a good job of improving the revenue.

Before we review the revenue performance of Andhra Pradesh from Budget FY2017–18, it is worth recollecting this statement by Yanamala Ramakrishnudu, the Finance Minister of Andhra Pradesh during the FY 2015–16 Budget Speech.

“The State continues to reel under revenue deficit and this deficit continues even after the last year of the award of 14th Finance Commission. Our debt burden and fiscal deficit will continue to increase as we keep borrowing to meet revenue expenditure. This provides an understanding of how the state has been handling revenue deficit and fiscal deficit. In a financial year, revenue deficit occurs when the revenue expenditure is higher than the revenue receipts. Fiscal deficit, on the other hand, is the difference between the total expenditure and total receipts (including the borrowings), and is usually referred to as the percentage of Gross Domestic Product (GDP) at and Gross State Domestic Product (GSDP) for a state.”

After three budgets, the current dispensation in the state has made efforts to bring down revenue deficit while containing fiscal deficit within the limits. From an estimated Rs. 14,242 crores (2.72% of GSDP) in FY 2014–15, the revenue deficit, estimated to be a mere Rs. 416 crores (0.05% of GSDP) by the end of FY 2017–18, is a significant progress in improving the state’s finances.

Similarly, the fiscal deficit target is set at 3% of GSDP during FY 2017–18; it was 3.88% of GSDP in FY 2014–15. While the revenue deficit and fiscal deficit targets for FY2017–18 look optimistic, it remains to be seen how the state manages to achieve this turnaround within three years, especially the revenue deficit.

The decline in revenue deficit indicates an increase in revenue of the state, and thus requires an understanding of the revenue performance since the state was dismembered.

Revenue%20deficit.jpg


Revenue Deficit and Fiscal Deficit (as Nominal values and % of GSDP). Source: http://www.apfinance.gov.in

Revenue Performance of Andhra Pradesh (FY 2014–18)

State revenues constitute two components — the state’s own revenues and transfers from the Union of India. State’s own revenues come from tax revenues through commercial taxes, registrations and stamps charges, and excise duty — and non-tax revenues are generated from general, social and economic services.

The transfers from the Union of India are through grants, and tax devolutions. A change in these components will indicate whether the revenues are growing or declining.

State’s own revenue

Between the FY 2014–15 and FY 2015–16, the state’s own tax revenues increased by 33.67% — with above ₹40,000 crores as a possibility — and is predicted to increase steadily.

The major contributors to own tax revenues are stamps and registration fees, state excise duties, taxes on sales, trade etc., and taxes on vehicles — each of them increased by 37.73%, 20.43%, 34.29%, and 46.33% respectively. Interestingly, the state is planning to increase revenues from taxes and duties on electricity.

AP%20revenues.jpg


Andhra Pradesh State’s Own Revenues (in Crores). Source: http://www.apfinance.gov.in

The non-tax revenue saw huge decline of 39.86% from FY 2014–15 to FY 2015–16, but stabilised at ₹4,000 crores, and can expect an incremental growth. In FY 2015–16 Budget Speech, the Finance Minister emphasised on increasing the state’s own non-tax revenue.

We have plans to explore possibilities of increasing non-tax revenues as it will not impose any tax burden on the people. We have already engaged experts for this purpose. We are also in the process of studying the excise policy of Tamil Nadu to see whether there is any lesson to learn.

To increase the state’s own tax revenues, the government of Andhra Pradesh has invested heavily in Information Technology, strict enforcement of Aadhar based registrations, improving transparency levels, and eradicating illicit distillations. These initiatives are expected to reap benefits and increase the revenues to the state.

Perhaps, due to lower levels of industrialisation, and urbanisation, Andhra Pradesh has low tax-GSDP ratio compared to the neighbouring states. The 14th Finance Commission projected tax-GSDP ratio as 7.98% for FY 2015–16, and 8.41% by FY 2019–20. Efforts to increase the tax base will help increase revenues.

Transfers from the Union of India

The tax devolution from the Union of India has increased by 91.32% from FY 2014–15 to FY 2015–16, and is expected to grow steadily. While the increase in taxes is promising, the larger share of the grants-in-aid from the Union of India — over 50% of total Union transfers, and nearly 25% of the total revenues of the state — is a challenge in the long-term.

Based on the Andhra Pradesh State Reorganisation Act, 2014, the 14th Finance Commission suggested revenue deficit gap to the state till FY 2019–20, and this component in grants-in-aid will end from FY 2020–21. The budget estimate of grants-in-aid for FY 2017–18 is higher than the actuals of FY 2015–16 and the revised estimates of FY 2016–17.

The state has two years before the Union of India stops transferring the revenue deficit grant to the state. While the expectation of more grants till FY2019–20 is justified, the continuation of the same trend will pose challenges to any dispensation in 2019.

Union%20transfers%20of%20AP.jpg


Union Transfers and Total Revenues (in Crores) of Andhra Pradesh. Source: http://www.apfinance.gov.in

Despite several challenges in revenue generation, the government of Andhra Pradesh and the Union of India have managed to tap the maximum revenues from the 13 districts of the state. FY 2017–18 is the third consecutive financial year for the dismembered Andhra Pradesh, and achieving this year’s targets of revenue deficit and fiscal deficit provides a better outlook on the revenue generation capabilities of the state.

The question is whether the revenue growth will sustain, and how to add the revenue capacity to the state.

Public investments, urbanisation, the size of manufacturing and commercial sectors (industrialisation), and openness of the economy are key components of revenue capacity of the state. The onus is on both the state government and the Union of India to strengthen the revenue base, improve revenue generation and financial situation of Andhra Pradesh.

The author is a volunteer with The Takshashila Institution - An independent networked think tank on India's strategic affairs.

Buddy, its you who seem to be the dimwit here. Its the hardwork of the state leadership and its people that state revenues have gone up. Bjp has raised each state share from 32% to 42% in central revenue and with our own increased revenues we get increased share from the centre. This is not unique to AP but every state had received similar increases. What had BJP did specifically to the state of AP?

Today, our students are forced to go out of state for their education because of bifurcation. Bifurcation act specifies centre to setup 11 educational institutes in AP ranging from iit, iim, aiims and such but even after four years not even one is established. It seems that outside AP, indians don't seem to understand the andhrites plight.

With Hyderabad as capital, people of AP used to have job opportunities within their state but with forced bifurcation we are today forced to move out of our state to get the jobs like Biharis.
 
Last edited:
.
@pothead @protest @danger007 @randomradio

I dont know what to say about the dimwits of Andhra Pradesh.

This is Revenue Collection along with Central Support to Andhra Pradesh.

What is going on in Andhra Pradesh is only POLITICS.

Just look at the INCREASE IN GRANTS from CENTER to Andhra Pradesh. Still these dimwits are crying.

https://www.thenewsminute.com/artic...-improved-its-revenue-after-bifurcation-58907

The AP growth story: How the state considerably improved its revenue after bifurcation
The question is whether the revenue growth will sustain, and how to add the revenue capacity to the state.
Share @Facebook Share @twitter Share @Email Share @google+ Share @reddit


chandrababu-naidu.jpg

Following the bifurcation of Andhra Pradesh in 2014, the newly-formed state of Andhra Pradesh comprising coastal Andhra and Rayalseema regions was faced with a major challenge: Hyderabad, the major source of revenue for united AP went to Telangana, and newly-formed AP had to figure out how to generate enough revenue and survive as an independent state. And if the AP budget 2017-18 is anything to go by, CM Chandrababu Naidu and his team seem to have done a good job of improving the revenue.

Before we review the revenue performance of Andhra Pradesh from Budget FY2017–18, it is worth recollecting this statement by Yanamala Ramakrishnudu, the Finance Minister of Andhra Pradesh during the FY 2015–16 Budget Speech.

“The State continues to reel under revenue deficit and this deficit continues even after the last year of the award of 14th Finance Commission. Our debt burden and fiscal deficit will continue to increase as we keep borrowing to meet revenue expenditure. This provides an understanding of how the state has been handling revenue deficit and fiscal deficit. In a financial year, revenue deficit occurs when the revenue expenditure is higher than the revenue receipts. Fiscal deficit, on the other hand, is the difference between the total expenditure and total receipts (including the borrowings), and is usually referred to as the percentage of Gross Domestic Product (GDP) at and Gross State Domestic Product (GSDP) for a state.”

After three budgets, the current dispensation in the state has made efforts to bring down revenue deficit while containing fiscal deficit within the limits. From an estimated Rs. 14,242 crores (2.72% of GSDP) in FY 2014–15, the revenue deficit, estimated to be a mere Rs. 416 crores (0.05% of GSDP) by the end of FY 2017–18, is a significant progress in improving the state’s finances.

Similarly, the fiscal deficit target is set at 3% of GSDP during FY 2017–18; it was 3.88% of GSDP in FY 2014–15. While the revenue deficit and fiscal deficit targets for FY2017–18 look optimistic, it remains to be seen how the state manages to achieve this turnaround within three years, especially the revenue deficit.

The decline in revenue deficit indicates an increase in revenue of the state, and thus requires an understanding of the revenue performance since the state was dismembered.

Revenue%20deficit.jpg


Revenue Deficit and Fiscal Deficit (as Nominal values and % of GSDP). Source: http://www.apfinance.gov.in

Revenue Performance of Andhra Pradesh (FY 2014–18)

State revenues constitute two components — the state’s own revenues and transfers from the Union of India. State’s own revenues come from tax revenues through commercial taxes, registrations and stamps charges, and excise duty — and non-tax revenues are generated from general, social and economic services.

The transfers from the Union of India are through grants, and tax devolutions. A change in these components will indicate whether the revenues are growing or declining.

State’s own revenue

Between the FY 2014–15 and FY 2015–16, the state’s own tax revenues increased by 33.67% — with above ₹40,000 crores as a possibility — and is predicted to increase steadily.

The major contributors to own tax revenues are stamps and registration fees, state excise duties, taxes on sales, trade etc., and taxes on vehicles — each of them increased by 37.73%, 20.43%, 34.29%, and 46.33% respectively. Interestingly, the state is planning to increase revenues from taxes and duties on electricity.

AP%20revenues.jpg


Andhra Pradesh State’s Own Revenues (in Crores). Source: http://www.apfinance.gov.in

The non-tax revenue saw huge decline of 39.86% from FY 2014–15 to FY 2015–16, but stabilised at ₹4,000 crores, and can expect an incremental growth. In FY 2015–16 Budget Speech, the Finance Minister emphasised on increasing the state’s own non-tax revenue.

We have plans to explore possibilities of increasing non-tax revenues as it will not impose any tax burden on the people. We have already engaged experts for this purpose. We are also in the process of studying the excise policy of Tamil Nadu to see whether there is any lesson to learn.

To increase the state’s own tax revenues, the government of Andhra Pradesh has invested heavily in Information Technology, strict enforcement of Aadhar based registrations, improving transparency levels, and eradicating illicit distillations. These initiatives are expected to reap benefits and increase the revenues to the state.

Perhaps, due to lower levels of industrialisation, and urbanisation, Andhra Pradesh has low tax-GSDP ratio compared to the neighbouring states. The 14th Finance Commission projected tax-GSDP ratio as 7.98% for FY 2015–16, and 8.41% by FY 2019–20. Efforts to increase the tax base will help increase revenues.

Transfers from the Union of India

The tax devolution from the Union of India has increased by 91.32% from FY 2014–15 to FY 2015–16, and is expected to grow steadily. While the increase in taxes is promising, the larger share of the grants-in-aid from the Union of India — over 50% of total Union transfers, and nearly 25% of the total revenues of the state — is a challenge in the long-term.

Based on the Andhra Pradesh State Reorganisation Act, 2014, the 14th Finance Commission suggested revenue deficit gap to the state till FY 2019–20, and this component in grants-in-aid will end from FY 2020–21. The budget estimate of grants-in-aid for FY 2017–18 is higher than the actuals of FY 2015–16 and the revised estimates of FY 2016–17.

The state has two years before the Union of India stops transferring the revenue deficit grant to the state. While the expectation of more grants till FY2019–20 is justified, the continuation of the same trend will pose challenges to any dispensation in 2019.

Union%20transfers%20of%20AP.jpg


Union Transfers and Total Revenues (in Crores) of Andhra Pradesh. Source: http://www.apfinance.gov.in

Despite several challenges in revenue generation, the government of Andhra Pradesh and the Union of India have managed to tap the maximum revenues from the 13 districts of the state. FY 2017–18 is the third consecutive financial year for the dismembered Andhra Pradesh, and achieving this year’s targets of revenue deficit and fiscal deficit provides a better outlook on the revenue generation capabilities of the state.

The question is whether the revenue growth will sustain, and how to add the revenue capacity to the state.

Public investments, urbanisation, the size of manufacturing and commercial sectors (industrialisation), and openness of the economy are key components of revenue capacity of the state. The onus is on both the state government and the Union of India to strengthen the revenue base, improve revenue generation and financial situation of Andhra Pradesh.

The author is a volunteer with The Takshashila Institution - An independent networked think tank on India's strategic affairs.

It is a lengthy story bro...
1.Revenue deficit: CBN manipulated lot of data in his favour.. he tried to project AP growth is unstoppable but the truth remain opp side of his data..
1. Apart Vizag steel plant and few other( smaller) there is no major industry I'm Andhra, majority revenue is from Hyderabad but it gone to TG..

2. Agriculture: Andhra blessed with agricultural land in Krishna and Godavari basin.. in the name of Capital city( Amaravati) he grabbed 1 00 000+++ acres of agricultural lands.... Majority of projects are taken by TDP leaders...

Scams: Amaravati itself a major scam... He spent 100 +cr for temporary residence in 3 years... His party leader caught on cam in Hyd, so he rushed to Amaravati though we can have mutual capital for 10 years... Built temporary secretariat ( spent 1000cr) instead of building permanent structures..

http://m.greatandhra.com/politics/gossip/rs-100-cr-spent-on-babus-guest-house-in-guntur-71456.html

http://www.andhraheadlines.com/news/state/159536/ap-interim-secretariat-cost-shockingly-escalates

http://www.businesstimes.com.sg/com...rights-to-indias-amaravati-city-start-up-area


As TDP is ally of BJP, they keep supporting CBN in various issues... Because of his personal gains and problems he needed BJP support, so even Centre not allocatig required funds for various development or schemes he remained silent... Now opposition twisting arms, so he took u turn, and turned against BJP... And centre not keeping their promises ...
 
.
So BJP didn't know about the criteria when they put that promise into their manifesto.

What Jaitley is promising is 90:10 ratio when it comes to external aided schemes, but what about preference with respect to central sponsored schemes and its financing, what about industrial incentives? Why would industry come to our state if there is no added incentive. 90:10 ratio has no value to the industry. If you are really going to match special status, do so in letter and spirit but not through cherry picking.

http://www.business-standard.com/ar...ils-new-industrial-policy-115040101165_1.html
One of the major tax incentives for industrial units is reimbursement of 100 per cent VAT/GST for micro and small units for five years, 75 per cent for medium and 50 per cent for large industries for seven years or up to the realisation of 100 per cent fixed capital investment, whichever is earlier.

With the central govt guaranteeing 90% of state loans and grants and GST benefits being accorded by the state govt, it's good for the industries to setup shop.

If anything more is given, then other states will become non-competitive and even they will start breaking up.
 
.
That is how it works. The center works only on stuff that only they are capable of handling. For example, you want a rail line between two or more states, the center has to fund it, that's why railways comes under the center. The same with highways, dams etc.

https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com...er-gst-till-december/articleshow/62811431.cms
Tamil Nadu's fears over the GST have been proven to be unfounded as eight months after its roll out, GST has raked in more money for the state exchequer than the erstwhile conventional VAT-based taxation system. Data of the state commercial tax department show that the state received Rs 23,317.76 crore under GST from July to December 2017, as against Rs 19,017.87 crore under VAT during the corresponding period the previous year.

https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com...t-panneerselvam-says/articleshow/63312421.cms
The Tamil Nadugovernment stuck to its target of lowering the fiscal deficit from 4.14% of the GSDP in 2016-17 to 2.82% in 2017-18 due to buoyancy in revenue collection after implementation of the goods and services tax, said deputy chief minister O Panneerselvam on Thursday.



Look at the links above and tell me it's not so.

The more the poorer states are subsidized, the greater is the impact on our states.



Kerala's per capita was similar to the rest of India, but HDI was greater than the rest of India post independence. The HDI figures merely kept up.

Kerala got richer as tourism from the rest of India started bringing in money. The Gulf remittances came in much later.

Kerala was bottom poorest state during 1947 .Except social reforms there was no material reforms.
So what HDI you are talking about ?
Lol :lol:
Kerala economy back bone was always NRIs.During there was no tourism in 70s until up to 90s .
During the ever growing investment of NRI money ,rest of Indian states especially was degrading due to their own politics
Still NRI remittance is bigger than state budget .
 
. .
Kerala was bottom poorest state during 1947 .Except social reforms there was no material reforms.
So what HDI you are talking about ?
Lol :lol:
Kerala economy back bone was always NRIs.During there was no tourism in 70s until up to 90s .
During the ever growing investment of NRI money ,rest of Indian states especially was degrading due to their own politics
Still NRI remittance is bigger than state budget .

Bro, Travancore was the second richest princely state in British Raj after Hyderabad.
 
.
Bro, Travancore was the second richest princely state in British Raj after Hyderabad.

Kerala was formed by joining the Travancore,Cochin and bigger yet poor Malabar.
Considering entire it was pathetic
 
.
Kerala was formed by joining the Travancore,Cochin and bigger yet poor Malabar.
Considering entire it was pathetic

Very difficult to believe. Kerala had twice the literacy rate compared to the rest of India after the state was formed post independence. Poor is relative.
 
.
Travancore was the second richest princely state in British Raj after Hyderabad.

Is that the reason Travancore wanted to be an independent country (not part of India)?

Indian history hid this part of Kerala history. Here it is. In July 1947, King of Travancore went on Travancore Radio and announced that he is declaring that Travancore will become an independent country when British leaves in August. But India sent its army in August into Travancore and King signed the pApers accepting to be part of India. Soon his Diwan Ramaswamy, considered the architect of independent Travancore, left Tranancore to Tamil Nadu (Madras State).
 
.
lolz and indians here pretend as there is no tension between sout and north india .

there isn't anything like South India or North India.

Buddy, its you who seem to be the dimwit here. Its the hardwork of the state leadership and its people that state revenues have gone up. Bjp has raised each state share from 32% to 42% in central revenue and with our own increased revenues we get increased share from the centre. This is not unique to AP but every state had received similar increases. What had BJP did specifically to the state of AP?

Today, our students are forced to go out of state for their education because of bifurcation. Bifurcation act specifies centre to setup 11 educational institutes in AP ranging from iit, iim, aiims and such but even after four years not even one is established. It seems that outside AP, indians don't seem to understand the andhrites plight.

With Hyderabad as capital, people of AP used to have job opportunities within their state but with forced bifurcation we are today forced to move out of our state to get the jobs like Biharis.

Going from AP to Telagana may be a big thing for AP resident. But for rest of Indians we would not be able to tell the difference.

there needs to be open and honest debate over revenue sharing
 
.
there isn't anything like South India or North India.



Going from AP to Telagana may be a big thing for AP resident. But for rest of Indians we would not be able to tell the difference.

there needs to be open and honest debate over revenue sharing

That's not how it works.
 
.
Buddy, its you who seem to be the dimwit here. Its the hardwork of the state leadership and its people that state revenues have gone up. Bjp has raised each state share from 32% to 42% in central revenue and with our own increased revenues we get increased share from the centre. This is not unique to AP but every state had received similar increases. What had BJP did specifically to the state of AP?

Today, our students are forced to go out of state for their education because of bifurcation. Bifurcation act specifies centre to setup 11 educational institutes in AP ranging from iit, iim, aiims and such but even after four years not even one is established. It seems that outside AP, indians don't seem to understand the andhrites plight.

With Hyderabad as capital, people of AP used to have job opportunities within their state but with forced bifurcation we are today forced to move out of our state to get the jobs like Biharis.

Hey,

Now how is behaving like a dimwit here???

And what to say who is biased here????

Why are you overlooking the figures of "Grants-in-Aid" from Center.

Just look at the figures of "Grants-in-Aid" Andhara Pradesh is receiving from the Center.

The "Grants-in-Aid" is More then what the Andhra's share in "Share of Central Taxes", despite it been increased substantially.

DYdHncuU8AAPAW0.jpg


It is a lengthy story bro...
1.Revenue deficit: CBN manipulated lot of data in his favour.. he tried to project AP growth is unstoppable but the truth remain opp side of his data..
1. Apart Vizag steel plant and few other( smaller) there is no major industry I'm Andhra, majority revenue is from Hyderabad but it gone to TG..

2. Agriculture: Andhra blessed with agricultural land in Krishna and Godavari basin.. in the name of Capital city( Amaravati) he grabbed 1 00 000+++ acres of agricultural lands.... Majority of projects are taken by TDP leaders...

Scams: Amaravati itself a major scam... He spent 100 +cr for temporary residence in 3 years... His party leader caught on cam in Hyd, so he rushed to Amaravati though we can have mutual capital for 10 years... Built temporary secretariat ( spent 1000cr) instead of building permanent structures..

http://m.greatandhra.com/politics/gossip/rs-100-cr-spent-on-babus-guest-house-in-guntur-71456.html

http://www.andhraheadlines.com/news/state/159536/ap-interim-secretariat-cost-shockingly-escalates

http://www.businesstimes.com.sg/com...rights-to-indias-amaravati-city-start-up-area


As TDP is ally of BJP, they keep supporting CBN in various issues... Because of his personal gains and problems he needed BJP support, so even Centre not allocatig required funds for various development or schemes he remained silent... Now opposition twisting arms, so he took u turn, and turned against BJP... And centre not keeping their promises ...

This what it is precise. What rest of India has to do with the internal politics of Andhra Pradesh. Old habits die hard, for populist and cheap politics.

It look like there is another SATYAM in the making in Andhra.

Kindly note, Bihar and Madhya Pradesh were also got separated and both the state lost their Industrial and Mineral Belt in the form of Jharkhand and Chhatisgarh.

What remained with them was Dirt Poor Population wholly dependent on Agriculture.

But these states are making it out without any "SPECIAL STATUS" and crying and name calling Center.

What so special about Andhara Pradesh????
 
.
Hey,

Now how is behaving like a dimwit here???

And what to say who is biased here????

Why are you overlooking the figures of "Grants-in-Aid" from Center.

Just look at the figures of "Grants-in-Aid" Andhara Pradesh is receiving from the Center.

The "Grants-in-Aid" is More then what the Andhra's share in "Share of Central Taxes", despite it been increased substantially.

DYdHncuU8AAPAW0.jpg




This what it is precise. What rest of India has to do with the internal politics of Andhra Pradesh. Old habits die hard, for populist and cheap politics.

It look like there is another SATYAM in the making in Andhra.

Kindly note, Bihar and Madhya Pradesh were also got separated and both the state lost their Industrial and Mineral Belt in the form of Jharkhand and Chhatisgarh.

What remained with them was Dirt Poor Population wholly dependent on Agriculture.

But these states are making it out without any "SPECIAL STATUS" and crying and name calling Center.

What so special about Andhara Pradesh????



Well bjp utilised it's ally situation. Dumped Andhra looked after northern states which it can get into power..


Boo double standard:



Centre cited 14th finance commission removed special status- Big lie..

https://www.google.co.in/amp/amp.sc...ites-constraints-in-finance-commission-report

https://www.deccanchronicle.com/150...rticle/special-status-andhra-pradesh-rejected


Meanwhile there is no such recommendations from 14th finance commission.


SmartSelect_20180318-125019_Chrome.jpg



https://www.google.co.in/amp/s/www....-lying-special-status-finance-commission/amp/

Railway zone: Initially argued odissa objecting railway zone, but meanwhile odissa MP stated- they are in favour... BJP had problem for allocating funds, CBN faults gave them stick...
 
.
Well bjp utilised it's ally situation. Dumped Andhra looked after northern states which it can get into power..
Boo double standard:
Centre cited 14th finance commission removed special status- Big lie..
https://www.google.co.in/amp/amp.sc...ites-constraints-in-finance-commission-report
https://www.deccanchronicle.com/150...rticle/special-status-andhra-pradesh-rejected
Meanwhile there is no such recommendations from 14th finance commission.
View attachment 460100
https://www.google.co.in/amp/s/www....-lying-special-status-finance-commission/amp/
Railway zone: Initially argued odissa objecting railway zone, but meanwhile odissa MP stated- they are in favour... BJP had problem for allocating funds, CBN faults gave them stick...

Comparing Andhra with minnows in North East??? All for getting some doals, Disgusting!!!!

All Andhra Politicians want is to Step over the Shoulders of Poor People of India, to shine their Politics, by making a non-issue to an emotional issue, to hide their incompetency and to get some votes. Pathetic.

The 14th Finance Commission was setup in year 2013 and Headed by a Person from Andhra Pradesh Dr.Y.V. Reddy. All the rules are already laied down.

You want GOI to break all the Institutional Structure just to pamper Ego of some crook Politician from Andhra Pradesh, who is misguiding people of his own state.

Look man there are many more states which in much dire state, then what Andhar Pradesh is.

Why do Andhra to have more rights then poor States like Madhya Pradesh, Bihar, Odisha, Assam??? Which of these states are enjoying Special Status or in Special Category?

Come up with a rational answer.

Thanks.
 
Last edited:
.

Latest posts

Pakistan Affairs Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom