Caught on camera: Muslim Man assaulted by peaceful vegetarians, forced to chant slogans in Khajuri Khas; one of the attackers held

[Andhadhun]

Just accept that you sissy Hindus don't have the balls. If the Muslim gets killed then thousands of Hindus would be killed in the riots that will follow.

That is a funny thing to say on a thread about a single Hindu beating up a muslim thief.

 

[Hiptullha]

A muslim man with a criminal record and was allegedly involved in a murder and robbery case was Caught when he wass trying to enter A Hindu dairy farmer's property with an intention to steal.

Alright so apparently this is how it went.
I see someone tresspassing my property - I beat them up, make them chant slogans, take a video recording of it then send it to my Hindu buddies on Whatsapp to show them how much of a peaceful Dharmi I am and how much lighter my skintone will be in my next life. I don't call the police nor do I file an FIR against him. Even though I'm a violent and vindictive chimp, I wouldn't have the criminal punished by the justice system. Yep this scenario makes perfect sense. Hindu logic!

 

[Andhadhun]

Don't troll there is no law in the US hat's tell you that's invader in your property is allowed to be killed, and what the proofs that's he was the invader why you think only Muslims disobey the law in India and Hindus can't break the law, you're being reported for your racist statements

LOL.

Defence of property - Wikipedia

en.wikipedia.org

As a matter of fact the report says the Hindu was arrested for defending his property and no case was registered against the thief.

 

[White and Green with M/S]

That is a funny thing to say on a thread about a single Hindu beating up a muslim thief.

And is Hindus are allowed to take laws in their hand, so what the purpose of Indian police and Judiciary then?

 

[Hiptullha]

And is Hindus are allowed to take laws in their hand, so what the purpose of Indian police and Judiciary then?

The judiciary's purpose is to give them clean chits when they rape and murder their neighbours.

 

[Andhadhun]

And is Hindus are allowed to take laws in their hand, so what the purpose of Indian police and Judiciary then?

Defending your property IS LEGAL in India. Even if it results in the death of the criminal.


Section 103 in The Indian Penal Code

103. When the right of private defence of property extends to causing death.—The right of private defence of property extends, under the restrictions mentioned in section 99, to the voluntary causing of death or of any other harm to the wrong-doer, if the offence, the committing of which, or the attempting to commit which, occasions the exercise of the right, be an offence of any of the descriptions hereinafter enumerated, namely:—

(First) — Robbery;

(Secondly) —House-breaking by night;

(Thirdly) — Mischief by fire committed on any building, tent or vessel, which building, tent or vessel is used as a human dwelling, or as a place for the custody of property;

(Fourthly) —Theft, mischief, or house-trespass, under such circumstances as may reasonably cause apprehension that death or grievous hurt will be the consequence, if such right of private defence is not exercised. STATE AMENDMENTS

(Karnataka)—(1) In section 103, in clause Thirdly,—
(i) after the words “mischief by fire”, insert the words “or any explosive substance”;
(ii)after the words “as a human dwelling, or” insert the words “as a place of worship, or”.
(2) After clause Fourthly, insert the following clause, namely:— “Fifthly.—Mischief by fire or any explosive substance committed on any property used or intended to be used for the purpose of Government or any local authority, statutory body or company owned or controlled by Government or railway or any vehicle used or adapted to be used for the carriage of passengers for hire or reward.” [Vide Karnataka Act 8 of 1972, sec. 2 (w.e.f. 7-10-1972)].
(Maharashtra)—In section 103, add the following at the end, namely:— “Fifthly.—Mischief by fire or any explosive substance committed on any property used or intended to be used for the purposes of Government or any local authority, statutory body, company owned or controlled by Government, railway or tramway, or on any vehicle used or adapted to be used, for the carriage of passengers for hire or reward”. [Vide Maharashtra Act 19 of 1971, sec. 26 (w.e.f. 31-12-1971)]. Uttar Pradesh.—In section 103, after clause fourthly, add the following clause, namely:— “Fifthly.—Mischief by fire or any explosive substance committed on—
(a) Any property used or intended to be used for the purpose of Government, or any local authority or other corporation owned or controlled by the Government, or
(b) any railway as defined in clause (4) of section 3 of the Indian Railways Act, 1890 or railways stores as defined in the Railways Stores (Unlawful Possession) Act, 1955, or
(c) any transport vehicle as defined in *clause (33) of section 2 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1939.” [Vide Uttar Pradesh Act 29 of 1970, sec. 2 (w.e.f. 17-7-1970)]. * See clause (47) of sec. 2 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988.

 

[Hiptullha]

Defending your property IS LEGAL in India. Even if it results in the death of the criminal.


Section 103 in The Indian Penal Code

103. When the right of private defence of property extends to causing death.—The right of private defence of property extends, under the restrictions mentioned in section 99, to the voluntary causing of death or of any other harm to the wrong-doer, if the offence, the committing of which, or the attempting to commit which, occasions the exercise of the right, be an offence of any of the descriptions hereinafter enumerated, namely:—

(First) — Robbery;

(Secondly) —House-breaking by night;

(Thirdly) — Mischief by fire committed on any building, tent or vessel, which building, tent or vessel is used as a human dwelling, or as a place for the custody of property;

(Fourthly) —Theft, mischief, or house-trespass, under such circumstances as may reasonably cause apprehension that death or grievous hurt will be the consequence, if such right of private defence is not exercised. STATE AMENDMENTS

(Karnataka)—(1) In section 103, in clause Thirdly,—
(i) after the words “mischief by fire”, insert the words “or any explosive substance”;
(ii)after the words “as a human dwelling, or” insert the words “as a place of worship, or”.
(2) After clause Fourthly, insert the following clause, namely:— “Fifthly.—Mischief by fire or any explosive substance committed on any property used or intended to be used for the purpose of Government or any local authority, statutory body or company owned or controlled by Government or railway or any vehicle used or adapted to be used for the carriage of passengers for hire or reward.” [Vide Karnataka Act 8 of 1972, sec. 2 (w.e.f. 7-10-1972)].
(Maharashtra)—In section 103, add the following at the end, namely:— “Fifthly.—Mischief by fire or any explosive substance committed on any property used or intended to be used for the purposes of Government or any local authority, statutory body, company owned or controlled by Government, railway or tramway, or on any vehicle used or adapted to be used, for the carriage of passengers for hire or reward”. [Vide Maharashtra Act 19 of 1971, sec. 26 (w.e.f. 31-12-1971)]. Uttar Pradesh.—In section 103, after clause fourthly, add the following clause, namely:— “Fifthly.—Mischief by fire or any explosive substance committed on—
(a) Any property used or intended to be used for the purpose of Government, or any local authority or other corporation owned or controlled by the Government, or
(b) any railway as defined in clause (4) of section 3 of the Indian Railways Act, 1890 or railways stores as defined in the Railways Stores (Unlawful Possession) Act, 1955, or
(c) any transport vehicle as defined in *clause (33) of section 2 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1939.” [Vide Uttar Pradesh Act 29 of 1970, sec. 2 (w.e.f. 17-7-1970)]. * See clause (47) of sec. 2 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988.

LMAO this Hindu desperately trawling through pages and pages of Indian law to justify this peaceful Dharmic assault, but watch as he completely fails to comprehend this one sentence.

Police, however, have not registered any case of theft or attempted theft against the victim.

 

[White and Green with M/S]

Defending your property IS LEGAL in India. Even if it results in the death of the criminal.


Section 103 in The Indian Penal Code

103. When the right of private defence of property extends to causing death.—The right of private defence of property extends, under the restrictions mentioned in section 99, to the voluntary causing of death or of any other harm to the wrong-doer, if the offence, the committing of which, or the attempting to commit which, occasions the exercise of the right, be an offence of any of the descriptions hereinafter enumerated, namely:—

(First) — Robbery;

(Secondly) —House-breaking by night;

(Thirdly) — Mischief by fire committed on any building, tent or vessel, which building, tent or vessel is used as a human dwelling, or as a place for the custody of property;

(Fourthly) —Theft, mischief, or house-trespass, under such circumstances as may reasonably cause apprehension that death or grievous hurt will be the consequence, if such right of private defence is not exercised. STATE AMENDMENTS

(Karnataka)—(1) In section 103, in clause Thirdly,—
(i) after the words “mischief by fire”, insert the words “or any explosive substance”;
(ii)after the words “as a human dwelling, or” insert the words “as a place of worship, or”.
(2) After clause Fourthly, insert the following clause, namely:— “Fifthly.—Mischief by fire or any explosive substance committed on any property used or intended to be used for the purpose of Government or any local authority, statutory body or company owned or controlled by Government or railway or any vehicle used or adapted to be used for the carriage of passengers for hire or reward.” [Vide Karnataka Act 8 of 1972, sec. 2 (w.e.f. 7-10-1972)].
(Maharashtra)—In section 103, add the following at the end, namely:— “Fifthly.—Mischief by fire or any explosive substance committed on any property used or intended to be used for the purposes of Government or any local authority, statutory body, company owned or controlled by Government, railway or tramway, or on any vehicle used or adapted to be used, for the carriage of passengers for hire or reward”. [Vide Maharashtra Act 19 of 1971, sec. 26 (w.e.f. 31-12-1971)]. Uttar Pradesh.—In section 103, after clause fourthly, add the following clause, namely:— “Fifthly.—Mischief by fire or any explosive substance committed on—
(a) Any property used or intended to be used for the purpose of Government, or any local authority or other corporation owned or controlled by the Government, or
(b) any railway as defined in clause (4) of section 3 of the Indian Railways Act, 1890 or railways stores as defined in the Railways Stores (Unlawful Possession) Act, 1955, or
(c) any transport vehicle as defined in *clause (33) of section 2 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1939.” [Vide Uttar Pradesh Act 29 of 1970, sec. 2 (w.e.f. 17-7-1970)]. * See clause (47) of sec. 2 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988.

Was he proved that being offender or just blame of extremist Hindus as usual

 

[Andhadhun]

Was he proved that being offender or just blame of extremist Hindus as usual

A well known Murderer and Thief was caught insider the property of the Victim and you want "proof" that he was there to steal and commit crime ?

Is this sympathy because the Thief is a muslim ? don't bother to answer. We all know the answer to that.

 

[khansaheeb]

Let me see if I understand this correctly.

A muslim man with a criminal record and was allegedly involved in a murder and robbery case was Caught when he wass trying to enter A Hindu dairy farmer's property with an intention to steal.

He was then mildly beaten up and asked to chant "Victory to India" and "defeat to pakistan".

So what exactly is your question ?

1. That murderers and thieves exist in India ?
2. That muslims criminals target Hindus for crime ?
3. That criminals get beaten up when caught ?

Answer to ALL of that is a YES.



Being an ACCUSED means you are INNOCENT until PROVEN GUILTY.

Literally ANYONE can be ACCUSED of ANYTHING. It means NOTHING.

Unless there is substantial video evidence of the crime like in case of Tahir Hussain.

OTOH it is well established that the Muslims started the Riot in Delhi for political reason (Trump visit) and the Hindus merely retaliated as part of Vigilante justice.

The guy is half the size of the Hindu and half the weight, I don't think he can even murder a chicken on his plate. Seriously is this the depth you Indians have fallen to?

 

[Andhadhun]

The guy is half the size of the Hindu and half the weight, I don't think he can even murder a chicken on his plate. Seriously is this the depth you Indians have fallen to?

What has height and size and weight got anything to do with ability to commit murder ?

Are all murders committed by people who are 6 feet tall, muscular and weight over 100 kg ?


Also here is the depth of pakistan's fall ( or rise depending on your perspective).

 

[xeuss]

Being an ACCUSED means you are INNOCENT until PROVEN GUILTY.

Literally ANYONE can be ACCUSED of ANYTHING. It means NOTHING.

Unless there is substantial video evidence of the crime like in case of Tahir Hussain.

OTOH it is well established that the Muslims started the Riot in Delhi for political reason (Trump visit) and the Hindus merely retaliated as part of Vigilante justice.

Forgot to add another point. Corrected version is below:

How does a riot accused continue on with his nefarious activities?

With the connivance, at every step, of the state and the entire depraved society:
- The police who let him off
- The prosecution who is unwilling to prosecute
- The depraved society who will leave no stone unturned to absolve the culprit and blame the victim

 

[Andhadhun]

Forgot to add another point. Corrected version is below:

How does a riot accused continue on with his nefarious activities?

With the connivance, at every step, of the state and the entire depraved society:
- The police who let him off
- The prosecution who is unwilling to prosecute
- The depraved society who will leave no stone unturned to absolve the culprit and blame the victim

LOL.