axisofevil
SENIOR MEMBER
- Joined
- May 10, 2009
- Messages
- 3,953
- Reaction score
- -14
Let be very clear, I am not sympathetic towards the interests of the US. I don't care why the US did something against India. Whatever be the reason, the US destabilized whole South Asia and tried to destabilize India. Wherever you have written not-sure for the US, the US was the major player (like in North East states, in association with the UK (took care of the finance part); Punjab in association with Pakistan).
That article you used as reference for the 2004 arms haul doesn't show the real picture. Weapons were sourced through Dubai, facilitated by a Pakistani Company whose owner died mysterious due to hear attack. The US was actively involved during the operation and tried to shield two DGFI agents after the Indian agencies killed the operation.
What is the threat that India poses to the US and UK?
As for the owner dying, don't you think ISI was involved to cover its links? Dubai is a place where various intel play.
What's the connection to US? I can see the US playing the game against us, as we were both on different sides. But after 9/11, events changed immensely. Maybe not quite far enough at the time.......but I think at the present moment...the US is doing everything in can to include India on a level playing field and not against India's interests?
What is the threat that India poses to the US and UK?
As for the owner dying, don't you think ISI was involved to cover its links? Dubai is a place where various intel play.
What's the connection to US? I can see the US playing the game against us, as we were both on different sides. But after 9/11, events changed immensely. Maybe not quite far enough at the time.......but I think at the present moment...the US is doing everything in can to include India on a level playing field and not against India's interests?
Regardless, should both nations continue to hold onto old baggage if we can make legimate headway towards a better and brighter future on better terms? The diplomt incident didn't make sense to me. It seemed a play aimed towards Congress maybe for indecision or lack of decision or something else behind the scenes. Seeing how corrupt Congress was and is, I am not sure where and how to look at this.