Can China get defeated ?
- Thread starter Hafizzz
- Start date
aakash_2410
BANNED
- Joined
- Sep 10, 2010
- Messages
- 2,249
- Reaction score
- 0
- Country
- Location
You guys must be thinking I'm being bit biased here putting india and uk in top 5. But it's the truth.
1 US
2 China
3 Russia
4 India
5 UK
6 France
World Military Strength Ranking
Top 10 Military Powers of the World
TOP 10 POWERFULL ARMY IN THE WORLD - Topix
We accept that chinese are quite powerful right now but why is it so hard for chinese members to accept that India is also up there in top 5?? And I'm not bieng biased at all. Look at these links for yourselves.
1 US
2 China
3 Russia
4 India
5 UK
6 France
World Military Strength Ranking
Top 10 Military Powers of the World
TOP 10 POWERFULL ARMY IN THE WORLD - Topix
We accept that chinese are quite powerful right now but why is it so hard for chinese members to accept that India is also up there in top 5?? And I'm not bieng biased at all. Look at these links for yourselves.
Last edited:
Hafizzz
SENIOR MEMBER
- Joined
- Jun 28, 2010
- Messages
- 5,041
- Reaction score
- 0
Why would it be hard for Chinese to accept that India is on the top 5 ? It is not like China has anything to lose with having India on the top 5 !!!
cross1993
SENIOR MEMBER
- Joined
- Jan 1, 2011
- Messages
- 2,060
- Reaction score
- 0
We do not mind what the rank of India is.
Plz, Let the French and Russia front row in China...
aakash_2410
BANNED
- Joined
- Sep 10, 2010
- Messages
- 2,249
- Reaction score
- 0
- Country
- Location
I dunno?! I dunno maybe, I think like this maybe because I DID read all the posts? It would be nice if your tone would be of informative discussion rather than arguing?
Thank you.
aakash_2410
BANNED
- Joined
- Sep 10, 2010
- Messages
- 2,249
- Reaction score
- 0
- Country
- Location
I understand that. I also love france but if France is in top and so is india then my UK wouldn't be there so, how about we take France off and keep both of the countries that represent me? Just being little greedy.
heavystorm
FULL MEMBER
- Joined
- Apr 21, 2010
- Messages
- 122
- Reaction score
- 0
Yes, US can defeat China.PLA has little experience in any form of warfare since 1962.US has been involved in combat operations or was in a state of 24hrs operational readiness since 1941.
If China invade India, PLA possibly be defeated by India people. But why China will do like this? Personally I think , if China become a invader, though PLA is very strong, China will be defeated by other counteries people. However, if other country such as USA or Japan invade China, I firmly believe that PLA would kill all of enemy soldiers except one officer, who is useful for sign on armistice.
PLA Soldiers, No Surrender, No back down![/COLOR]
gambit
PROFESSIONAL
- Joined
- Apr 28, 2009
- Messages
- 28,569
- Reaction score
- 148
- Country
- Location
Utter nonsense...
First...There were two political entities in Viet Nam: North and South. Just like Korea is today. So it is incorrect in everyway to say: Vietnam actually went head to head with the US...
The 'Vietnamization' program of the war was to let South Viet Nam take the lead in prosecuting the war and eventually to achieve leadership in defending the status quo: partition. America's role would be like that in Korea: support with considerable military resources. By 1973, the only US active duty branches were the USAF and special operations. North Viet Nam's allegedly 'military genius' Vo Nguyen Giap launched what the Americans called 'The Easter Offensive'...
Easter Offensive - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
South Viet Nam with US air power, held the country. The Easter Offensive further confirmed, to those who actually took an objective analysis of Giap as a tactician, that Giap is more of a wily guerilla hit-and-run fighter than of an able large army commander despite the fact that he had such a large army at his disposal. The PAVN never had any advantage over the American military and even though the ARVN was riddled with corruption and incompetence at the top, the PAVN was at best at par with the ARVN, never its superior and Giap's failure at the Easter Offensive proved that parity.
Second...Liberation from what? You mean when the communists 'liberated' Hue City from the 'oppression' by thousands of teachers, doctors, and assorted professionals. Prior to the 1969 Tet Offensive, North Viet Nam counted on the hope that there would be mass uprising by the South Vietnamese against its government. Giap knew that would never happened. He objected to the planned attack. Giap was correct. No such uprising occurred. At the end, so many Southern Viets turned in and turned against the Viet Cong that the VC ceased to field any more than squad level, whereas before at times Giap could call up to batallion strength from the VC. So what 'liberation' are you talking about? The one the Chinese government spoon fed you?
below_freezing
ELITE MEMBER
- Joined
- Feb 26, 2010
- Messages
- 8,253
- Reaction score
- 0
Vietnam refers to the current state of Vietnam, which was based on North Vietnam.
The end result was the end of South Vietnam as a political entity.
Individual tactical losses are meaningless, the strategic win is what is most important.
The end result was the end of South Vietnam as a political entity.
Individual tactical losses are meaningless, the strategic win is what is most important.
AerospaceEngineer
BANNED
- Joined
- Jan 12, 2011
- Messages
- 680
- Reaction score
- 0
I am still on it. I might even go for a PhD.
He got banned for calling me have "low" IQ and EQ. LOL
faithfulguy
ELITE MEMBER
- Joined
- Nov 29, 2009
- Messages
- 13,651
- Reaction score
- -2
- Country
- Location
If that is the case, then China lost to Vietnam in the 1979 Sino-Vietnamese war as the objective of force Vietnam to pull out of Cambodia was not achieved.
duhastmish
SENIOR MEMBER
- Joined
- Jan 20, 2009
- Messages
- 4,302
- Reaction score
- -4
if it will ever come to this , India will have a great opportunity .
not to destroy china but support them. India and Russia will come to help china from outside. but the best option should be to make a trio -
and make a new force - to hold America and other's .
Catch them by the balls and make the realize who is their papa this time around.
china can not be beaten because opposite to others belief their rise is way more peaceful than American.
not to destroy china but support them. India and Russia will come to help china from outside. but the best option should be to make a trio -
and make a new force - to hold America and other's .
Catch them by the balls and make the realize who is their papa this time around.
china can not be beaten because opposite to others belief their rise is way more peaceful than American.
below_freezing
ELITE MEMBER
- Joined
- Feb 26, 2010
- Messages
- 8,253
- Reaction score
- 0
I agree, we lost. We failed in our final strategic objective, and the tactical victories were unimportant. This is why we must be determined to avenge our loss, either militarily or economically. We've already built dams on the Mekong, ready to shut off Vietnam's water supply.
HongWu
BANNED
- Joined
- Nov 25, 2009
- Messages
- 2,604
- Reaction score
- 0
- Country
- Location
Actually we beat Vietnam in numerous land and naval skirmishes in the 80's and 90's. Even today, China enforces control of the Paracels with fishing fleet. For the most part, Vietnam is pacified.
The only thing Vietnam has over us now is control over some of the Spratly Islands.
below_freezing
ELITE MEMBER
- Joined
- Feb 26, 2010
- Messages
- 8,253
- Reaction score
- 0
Shh, where do we get our excuse to fully liberate Vietnam now?
