Can anyone tell me why India and Pakistan don’t get along?

[Icewolf]

So you are saying that India/Malayasian/Indonesian/SG/US/UK or where ever the Chinese have emigrated in the past have no right over the Yellow Basin Chinese Civilization just bcs now the above said region comes under the control of PRC.

No one migrates to India.

 

[Pride]

how many times should i tell u ?? hindu ,hindustan all these names were given to u after a long time .....there was no bharat ,hindusium etc.....there were only touchable and non-touchable(caste system)........

between u should have learnt what buddha guatam taught u then claim of IVC as ur own

Good Morning, You surely enlightened me with your extreme knowledge of history. By the way, Buddhism is 6th Century BCE onl while IVC is approx 2000-3000 BCE year old.

 

[pk_baloch]

None of the Pakistanis can even name a single personality who lived in Pre-Islamic Pakistani territory although some only know the name of King Porus(by grace of West) but still can't quote a second name.

yes i know the name , first u give the name of first dravidian man and women ...who must be hindu and dravidian??

 

[Icewolf]

Good Morning, You surely enlightened me with your extreme knowledge of history. By the way, Buddhism is 6th Century BCE onl while IVC is approx 2000-3000 BCE year old.

Buddhism is not Hinduism, same as you cannot claim IVC because you are dravidian

 

[neutral_person]

yes i know the name , first u give the name of first dravidian man and women ...who must be hindu and dravidian??

If you really are Balochi (and not just pretending to be one thanks to the anonymity of the internet), you tell us. After all ,you are a Dravidian.

Buddhism is not Hinduism, same as you cannot claim IVC because you are dravidian

Do some basic research on the topic, how many times do I have to copy and paste the same $hit?

To Pakistanis saying that IVC belong to them due to genetical links, simple research would show you the fact that the IVC completely disappeared from the face of the Earth and that is even today one of the biggest mysteries of History. Many Historians claim that this happened because the ancient rivers in the Civilization areas dried up due to climate change. There are two theories as to what happened with the IVC in general after its demise in Pakistan, Northern India and Western India (as well as parts of Iran and Afghanistan):

1) They moved further East to (central, East) India, and continued their civilization in the Gangetic plains. Some historians point to the fact that some idols that were worshipped in the IVC were later worshipped in the Gangetic plains, which indicate a migration pattern.

2) They completely died off the thee droughts due to climate change and there is no "descendent" of IVC in this world.

 

[Pride]

well many Muslims invaded India and he is saying that Pakistan is having ballistic missile with name of those muslim invader like shaub uddin ghauri whom india consider as looters and cruel rulers. Question here is India did not accepted the existence of Pakistan and these two countries have been at wars because of conflict Kashmir. so they were expecting Pakistan to have missile for india with names of those who are hero for India again India and Pakistan have different perspective of history. If ghuri was hindu who would have rule on Pakistani Muslims and Pakistan would have bad views of him then i am sure his name would have use for Indian missile

You took a full round turn here. The confusing part for Pakistanis are that you claim IVC civilization due to the reason that it only lies in your boundary. It means ideologically you are not aligned with the IVCs further inheritances and if you believe that Ghouri and Ghazni turns out to be your hero who were not only invaders but actually destroyer of Vedic culture as well which was crux of IVC. So either made them hero or disown the claim on IVC.

Rest is whatever you want to keep the name is your choice but be on the side but atleast decide on which side you are.

 

[pk_baloch]

Good Morning, You surely enlightened me with your extreme knowledge of history. By the way, Buddhism is 6th Century BCE onl while IVC is approx 2000-3000 BCE year old.

there was nothing like hindusium in IVC during dravidian time ..only caste system people who had many gods later after a veryy long time they were given the name hindu ....

 

[Pride]

Buddhism is not Hinduism, same as you cannot claim IVC because you are dravidian

Are You making any sense and how come I suddenly become Dravidian?

 

[pk_baloch]

If you really are Balochi (and not just pretending to be one thanks to the anonymity of the internet), you tell us. After all ,you are a Dravidian.

yes im arab dravidian,aryan from arab and iran etc but not hindu


first u tell me the name of the first dravidian hindu

 

[Icewolf]

To Pakistanis saying that IVC belong to them due to genetical links, simple research would show you the fact that the IVC completely disappeared from the face of the Earth and that is even today one of the biggest mysteries of History. Many Historians claim that this happened because the ancient rivers in the Civilization areas dried up due to climate change. There are two theories as to what happened with the IVC in general after its demise in Pakistan, Northern India and Western India (as well as parts of Iran and Afghanistan):

1) They moved further East to (central, East) India, and continued their civilization in the Gangetic plains. Some historians point to the fact that some idols that were worshipped in the IVC were later worshipped in the Gangetic plains, which indicate a migration pattern.

2) They completely died off the thee droughts due to climate change and there is no "descendent" of IVC in this world.

Your wrong. IVC people didnt die. Rather they spread out into areas of modern Pakistan. Or we could say, the IVC continued and is the modern Islamic Republic of Pakistan

 

[Pride]

there was nothing like hindusium in IVC during dravidian time ..only caste system people who had many gods later after a veryy long time they were given the name hindu ....

If you are a teenager and want to troll then I am sorry, I am not in a mood right now to take history class.

 

[Icewolf]

there was nothing like hindusium in IVC during dravidian time ..only caste system people who had many gods later after a veryy long time they were given the name hindu ....

Hindu was not meant for religion. Rather, Hindu was a name meant for the people who live around Sindhu (Indus) River

 

[harpoon]

That's not what I said.

If they call themselves Chinese rather than Indian, and have some actual linkage to China, then sure they have a right to it.

So basically according to your logic people like Lee kuan yew have no right over Chinese Civilization.

Not to mention the Taiwanese should also have no right over Chinese Civilization either as they identify themselves as Taiwanese first..not to mention Chinese Americans, Chinese British etc should also have no right for the Chinese Civilization either.

 

[neutral_person]

Your wrong. IVC people didnt die. Rather they spread out into areas of modern Pakistan. Or we could say, the IVC continued and is the modern Islamic Republic of Pakistan

Nope, they died out or migrated east to the Gangetic plains, or both. Read up on the IVC before blindly spouting BS.

Hindu was not meant for religion. Rather, Hindu was a name meant for the people who live around Sindhu (Indus) River

Hindu traditionally meant for people living East of the Indus. It is more than a religion though, it is a South Asian Indian identity that we have had for over 5000 years and continue to do so.

 

[Chinese-Dragon]

So basically people like Lee kuan yew have no right over Chinese Civilization.

Not to mention the Taiwanese should also have no right over Chinese Civilization as they identify themselves as Taiwanese first.

Lee Kuan Yew is a Singaporean, so his identity is Singaporean.

Taiwan claims to be the true and legitimate Government of all China. Taiwan is 98% Han Chinese, so they are descendants of the Huaxia people. Being Taiwanese does not preclude being Chinese just as being Shanghainese does not, unless the individual specifically rejects it (in which case they give up their connection to the Chinese civilization anyway).

PRC is not the same thing as China. And the CPC is just our current Government, no more and no less.

You are really running through hoops to try and claim a civilization that exists in another country.