krash
MODERATOR
- Joined
- Jul 28, 2009
- Messages
- 5,885
- Reaction score
- 29
- Country
- Location
They have every right to complain about their rights, no one's stopping them.
They don't complain about it because their very first thought is not "Aha! How can I make this serve my ethno-linguistic agendas? How can I use this to blame everything on the rest of Pakistan?" They'd rather shut up and serve their country instead.
Apparently if we consider the issue being discussed here (land ownership rights) then on surface it definitely seems "preferential treatment" for one party but as we have observed such biased rules negatively affect both parties.
Given your past record, I will only consider your concerns as genuine this one time. If you try to still peddle these foolish accusations of "preferential treatment" and "bias" then I will shut you down very swiftly.
Under the UN resolution signed by Pakistan and the official position of the State of Pakistan, the region formerly known as the Princely State of Kashmir is a disputed region whose future will be decided solely as per the express wishes of its people. Pakistan holds itself accountable to the Kashmiris' right of self-determination and until they have exercised that right, Pakistan will honor and hold their land under its control in trust. Until they have decided it for themselves Pakistan acknowledges that it does not hold final sovereignty over GB or AJK. Hence, until that day a non-resident of the region has no rights over that region. It would be quite moronic for Pakistan to breach this resolution since it is the strongest leg both our claim and argument stand on. Would also be a breach of the rights and trust of the people you pretend to fight for.
Furthermore, under Pakistan's constitution, every person belonging to GB, AJK, and J&K is a Pakistani citizen by birthright. Hence, he/she has every right afforded to every other Pakistani citizen, including the right to purchase land in Pakistan Proper.
@truthfollower
For example just think how much money GB people can make by selling beautiful lands to rich businessmen from Karachi, similarly businesses will build infrastructure there that will benefit locals and there will be prosperity.
No, there wouldn't be any of that. You clearly don't know the region or how any of this works. Businesses are free to operate there as it is. A "rich businessman from Karachi" does not need to own land there to operate his business. Neither has he done any good for or moved to any of the other many "beautiful lands" that he can already purchase in KPK, Northern Punjab, and North Western Balochistan.
PS: The moment it is opened for the rest of Pakistan, you will ruin it.
Last edited: