What's new

Camouflage of indigenousness for nuclear weapons & myth of Indian space programmes.

Bharat Muslim

BANNED
Joined
Aug 7, 2010
Messages
1,027
Reaction score
-8
Country
India
Location
India
Bhartis have created a camouflage of indigenousness for their nuclear weapons. They want to send a signal of deterrence because they have a plethora of enemies ranging from Pakistan to USA, China to Sri Lanka, Bangladesh to Myanmar (regarding enmity with USA, elaboration is required for skeptical readers). Bhartis want to say, "Look we are capable of retaliating to your nuclear strikes if need be. So exercise restraint."

Hence they came up with copied or reverse engineered models of rockets to launch their civilian space missions. Using this copied or reverse engineered rocket technology and perhaps even covertly hiring Russian scientists, they launched their Mars mission and Lunar mission. They also use this plagiarized technology to launch commercial satellites for Western countries and charge handsome fees for their services.

Indians don't have a childish mindset. Unlike Americans - who claim to have landed on moon way back in 1969 with primitive computers - Indians don't claim implausible feats although the plausible feats may have been actually done by someone else. They are not given to empty boastings or making fake claims unless there is a compulsion. Here the compelling reason which made it necessary to brag about the borrowed technology is the threat of nuclear war. Indians want to avert nuclear attacks and hence started to show off the space capabilities which actually may have been purchased from all over the world. If the various enemies of India hadn't possessed nukes, Indians wouldn't have bluffed about space achievements. The point they want to convey is: "Since we are capable of making civilian rockets, we are also capable of making effective and functioning nukes. So beware and refrain from using your nukes."

How else would you explain that the country which unabashedly calls the assembly of imported parts as their indigenous plane (reference to Tejas) is able to carry out such above mentioned high-end innovations?

How else would you explain that the country that produces such bad quality software coders/programmers is able to carry out such above mentioned high-end innovations?

How else would you explain that the country that is unable to eradicate basic problem like open-defecation is able to carry out such above mentioned high-end innovations?

How else would you explain that the country that is harassed by a tiny neighbor like Pakistan (relatively speaking Pakistan is tiny) is able to carry out such above mentioned high-end innovations?
 
Last edited:
.
Elaborating through metaphor/allegory:

Australian cricketer Mitchell Starc: India's sledging down to fear of losing series.

Though Indians don't sledge in cricket, this statement should be regarded as true for the sake of analogical explanation.

Indians really seem to be bluffing about the space capabilities in order to deter nuclear strikes against them.
 
. .
Elaborating through metaphor/allegory:

Australian cricketer Mitchell Starc: India's sledging down to fear of losing series.

Though Indians don't sledge in cricket, this statement should be regarded as true for the sake of analogical explanation.

Indians really seem to be bluffing about the space capabilities in order to deter nuclear strikes against them.


can Anyone summarize what this thread is talking about..?????o_Oo_Oo_O
 
.
Bhartis have created a camouflage of indigenousness for their nuclear weapons. They want to send a signal of deterrence because they have a plethora of enemies ranging from Pakistan to USA, China to Sri Lanka, Bangladesh to Myanmar (regarding enmity with USA, elaboration is required for skeptical readers). Bhartis want to say, "Look we are capable of retaliating to your nuclear strikes if need be. So exercise restraint."

Hence they came up with copied or reverse engineered models of rockets to launch their civilian space missions. Using this copied or reverse engineered rocket technology and perhaps even covertly hiring Russian scientists, they launched their Mars mission and Lunar mission. They also use this plagiarized technology to launch commercial satellites for Western countries and charge handsome fees for their services.

Indians don't have a childish mindset. Unlike Americans - who claim to have landed on moon way back in 1969 with primitive computers - Indians don't claim implausible feats although the plausible feats may have been actually done by someone else. They are not given to empty boastings or making fake claims unless there is a compulsion. Here the compelling reason which made it necessary to brag about the borrowed technology is the threat of nuclear war. Indians want to avert nuclear attacks and hence started to show off the space capabilities which actually may have been purchased from all over the world. If the various enemies of India hadn't possessed nukes, Indians wouldn't have bluffed about space achievements. The point they want to convey is: "Since we are capable of making civilian rockets, we are also capable of making effective and functioning nukes. So beware and refrain from using your nukes."

How else would you explain that the country which unabashedly calls the assembly of imported parts as their indigenous plane (reference to Tejas) is able to carry out such above mentioned high-end innovations?

How else would you explain that the country that produces such bad quality software coders/programmers is able to carry out such above mentioned high-end innovations?

How else would you explain that the country that is unable to eradicate basic problem like open-defecation is able to carry out such above mentioned high-end innovations?

How else would you explain that the country that is harassed by a tiny neighbor like Pakistan (relatively speaking Pakistan is tiny) is able to carry out such above mentioned high-end innovations?

This revelation makes me lose interest in Indus civilization. It makes me think, "So what if we are part of Indus civilization? How does it matter? What benefit does being part of Indus give us?" Suddenly the topic of Indus loses its attraction by reading this thread.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
.
Bhartis have created a camouflage of indigenousness for their nuclear weapons. They want to send a signal of deterrence because they have a plethora of enemies ranging from Pakistan to USA, China to Sri Lanka, Bangladesh to Myanmar (regarding enmity with USA, elaboration is required for skeptical readers). Bhartis want to say, "Look we are capable of retaliating to your nuclear strikes if need be. So exercise restraint."

Hence they came up with copied or reverse engineered models of rockets to launch their civilian space missions. Using this copied or reverse engineered rocket technology and perhaps even covertly hiring Russian scientists, they launched their Mars mission and Lunar mission. They also use this plagiarized technology to launch commercial satellites for Western countries and charge handsome fees for their services.

Indians don't have a childish mindset. Unlike Americans - who claim to have landed on moon way back in 1969 with primitive computers - Indians don't claim implausible feats although the plausible feats may have been actually done by someone else. They are not given to empty boastings or making fake claims unless there is a compulsion. Here the compelling reason which made it necessary to brag about the borrowed technology is the threat of nuclear war. Indians want to avert nuclear attacks and hence started to show off the space capabilities which actually may have been purchased from all over the world. If the various enemies of India hadn't possessed nukes, Indians wouldn't have bluffed about space achievements. The point they want to convey is: "Since we are capable of making civilian rockets, we are also capable of making effective and functioning nukes. So beware and refrain from using your nukes."

How else would you explain that the country which unabashedly calls the assembly of imported parts as their indigenous plane (reference to Tejas) is able to carry out such above mentioned high-end innovations?

How else would you explain that the country that produces such bad quality software coders/programmers is able to carry out such above mentioned high-end innovations?

How else would you explain that the country that is unable to eradicate basic problem like open-defecation is able to carry out such above mentioned high-end innovations?

How else would you explain that the country that is harassed by a tiny neighbor like Pakistan (relatively speaking Pakistan is tiny) is able to carry out such above mentioned high-end innovations?
This revelation makes me lose interest in Indus civilization. It makes me think, "So what if we are part of Indus civilization? How does it matter? What benefit does being part of Indus give us?" Suddenly the topic of Indus loses its attraction by reading this thread.



This revelation makes me lose interest in Indus civilization. It makes me think, "So what if we are part of Indus civilization? How does it matter? What benefit does being part of Indus give us?" Suddenly the topic of Indus loses its attraction by reading this thread.
@Sky lord @Tamilnadu @Surya 1 @Dragon Ball
 
. . .
Basically guy is saying India never did mars mission and America faked moon landing. :crazy:

Troll thread. Waste of your time and my time . :close_tema:
You didn't get him. He is saying that although Indians did the Mars and lunar mission, they didn't do it by designing their own technology but by paying money to purchase/smuggle technology from Russia.
 
. .
Even if they did. What difference does it make now? When India is able to send commercial satellites into space much cheaper.
India's commercial satellite launching is reminiscent of Indian InfoTech industry - no innovation but cheap workforce.
 
.
Even if they did. What difference does it make now? When India is able to send commercial satellites into space much cheaper.

Thread poster is simply has some frustration...Even if India is not innovating and paying money to get the desired things, what is wrong with it. It shows that we have financial ability to purchase critical technological products.
 
. . .
.
Back
Top Bottom