What's new

Call me "Jinx!"

.
age.png

aQpX3zW_700b.jpg
 
. . . . . . . . .
As for the second one I can't identify that cause I don't have a good view of the turret.

Well, that was intended:D. You're right on the first, but I wanted to test you a bit too.

Here's another view of the second tank I presented:
arkiv_fms20004_326_document.t463f06be.m800.x80088475.jpg


arkiv_1998__451_document.t43e094c8.m800.xd3926c7d.jpg


And a different system.
Cold%20Response%202010_Fossbakken%2C%20Felt_Foto%20-%20Ronny%20Hammerstad%20Jensen%2C%20Forsvaret20100225_0565.t4b863c1e.m800.xf803ee07.jpg


lmh-cr09-105.t49c0b820.m1200.x496c4f8b.JPG


A good analyst doesn't need all the details to identify a system.

You are 18 ?

Mentally yes, I'm stuck at around 18:p:.

I'm 26.

I have been reading your Post in PDF from 18 years :partay:

:o:But I've only been a PDF member since May 2, 2015!

Damn time traveler:pissed:!!
 
. . . .
That's a leopard 2 took me some though because I couldn't see the fume extractor


Leopard 1

Nice work. Both are indeed Leopard tanks, one a Leo 1 and the other a Leo 2.

Pfft,im sure its a Viking tank,Swedish?

Swedish:o:? That renegade Norwegian territory? No, but Sweden also uses Leopard 2s.

Swedish Leo 2A5's - Strv 122B - have bolt-on armor on the front of the turret:
foto_tanja_renate_aakeroy-7011.t5320222e.m1200.x9a972b93.jpg


lmh-cr2014-154.t532173be.m800.x2f35bae8.jpg


foto_ole_sverre_haugli-CR14-6.t532173c8.m1200.x7611f58b.jpg


But Norwegian Leopard 2NOs don't - Longship, clearly belonging to Telemark Battalion:
20160608AA_CGUK_8.t5757a09c.m800.xfcd39f1c.jpg


tkleoC1389.t521f0dd8.m800.x51425e2f.jpg


AA_Vest_deploy_17.t55784a40.m800.x5dbd15e1.jpg


Swedish tanks are also painted with a camo pattern, while Norwegian ones are camouflaged with nets to break up their outline instead;
AA_VikingYmer_8.t56570f48.m800.xb9b682fe.jpg


They are painted either a drab green or tan color:
AA_CR16_020316_10.t56d703f0.m800.xf666307e.jpg
 
.
Back
Top Bottom