TimeToScoot
BANNED
- Joined
- Feb 28, 2014
- Messages
- 860
- Reaction score
- -20
- Country
- Location
Wherever you go Jihad follows you.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Russia has already asymmetrical methods to deal with the shield.
im not saying they could win, but im saying theyre not easy targets either. but im putting it conventionally. remember russia would be the invader not them. theyre playing in their own ground. which gives them significant advantage, moreover oil importing countries would not be too happy about a war. including your own country, india.
russia couldn't send its own satellites into orbit successfully. it has lagged too many years behind due to corruption. i understand indians love for the russia. but you guys give russia too much credit. within a decade u will surpass russia in everything.
USA was helping chechens according to FSB.A lot of rebel chechens live in USA ,UK and middle east.Russia singlehandly crushed them in past 200 years.
using nuclear weapons is out of question.
don't worry.If Russia offers us indians ,oil rich regions of arabia ,I am game for it.India would join the russian forces and nuke the hell out of saudis and grab their resources. Payback and vengeance .
Russia has been sending satellites to orbit consistently for years. Yes,Russia has corruption issues these days.There missiles work fine.
@vostok @Arzamas 16no. usa saw chechens as a long term threats to its own interest. there might have been people inside cia that might have aid chechens, but eventually russia victory over chechen was only possible due to usa aids.
usa will develop its missile shield within 10 years. new technologies will reduce costs and that means usa will still have significant advantage over its rivals. us economy is improving too. what usa needs to do right now is to let jihadis an russians finish off each other.
china already is able to threaten us mainland it could since 1970s. but that is going to change. dont forget the technological superiority of the usa.
not so much against chechens. a quick look at wikipedia shows that they actually didnt perform well against chechens. too many deaths.
im not saying they could win, but im saying theyre not easy targets either. but im putting it conventionally. remember russia would be the invader not them. theyre playing in their own ground. which gives them significant advantage, moreover oil importing countries would not be too happy about a war. including your own country, india.
russia couldn't send its own satellites into orbit successfully. it has lagged too many years behind due to corruption. i understand indians love for the russia. but you guys give russia too much credit. within a decade u will surpass russia in everything.
Wrong.USA has been using chechens against Russia and armed the chechens from 1991 onwards. And Russia has smashing chechen insurgencies for more than 200 years.
I believe that illegally destroyed in 1991 to be reunited . Under a different name , but must be reunited .My opinion about Crimea and Eastern Ukraine:
Every nation/ethnicity, has the self-determination right. IMO, if an ethnicity occupies a considerable amount of land, and that land has border with countries outside, and if that ethnicity has an absolute majority in some region, they have the right to declare their independency or join another country. But, there are some points which need to be considered, the new administration of that region needs to be democratic, and by democratic, I mean both acting according to the majority vote and also preserving the minorities rights.
For Crimea, they have every right to declare their dependency, but the the problem is joining with Russia which is not democratic, and also minorities rights, like Crimean tatar rights, may be violated.
@vostok , what's your opinion about my post?
They won't need to. Today they have option of arming Shia terrorist groups in Sunni majority country.
By threatning mainland, i mean in conventional sense.
Russia got hammered in first battle of Grozney because it tried to ape US's desert storm tactics of pure armor which were ill suited in Urban reigon and ills uited for T-72 series. Once they rectified that, they gained upper hand.
Agreed... and most rational thinking members here know this. However. There are some here who talk of "nuking this and nuking that" like it would be some kind of video game. They have absolutely no clue of how the real world outside of their little PDF fantasy land works.
In the 90s Russia fought not with the Chechens - with global terrorism. You perfectly know, who in our world sponsors terrorism and creates all sorts of Al-Qaedas and the Mujahideens.@vostok @Arzamas 16
Wrong.USA has been using chechens against Russia and armed the chechens from 1991 onwards. And Russia has smashing chechen insurgencies for more than 200 years.
In Crimea, the U.S. has no chance of starting a war of terror against Russia, as they did in Afghanistan and in the North Caucasus. Vast majority of the population of Crimea - Russian. The terrorists just will not have support the local population and hence terrorism is doomed to failure.