Fattyacids
SENIOR MEMBER
- Joined
- Dec 9, 2012
- Messages
- 3,336
- Reaction score
- 2
The point was that India didn't need Aryan migration to get a civilization. I don't argue that Aryans created a civilization and that is major part of India now as the Aryans have the numerical superiority, but at the same time the Dravidian developed there own civilization. You can understand the concept better if you know that south Indian/Dravidian languages bear no similarity to Aryan ones.
I sometimes feel that India has been a comfort zone, not much of predators, easy availability of food and shelter, not much of a hard time for anyone. People living in such conditions get a lot of time to develop a basic civilization. I think it was similar case with eastern regions of China. How advanced that civilization goes to be is a different matter, though Indians did a good job.
I get your point, but the fact is India's civilization is Vedic Aryan. Although Proto-Dravidian is different from Sanskrit, it borrowed a great from it. Rig Veda is holy to the dravidians as well.
No similarity with China.