whatever I was 'smoking', it is definitely not false pride.
I didn't say Indian railway system had not developed, I am only saying that the development was not significant, and the authorities asked far more from it than investing in it. The statistics may look impressive on paper, but what about the quality and real development? If you can't think of one example, I suggest you compare the punctuality of trains in different countries.
Regarding railways, the Indian government had a great head start that was enviable to many. It may be unfair if we use Japan or France as benchmarks, but let's consider China. China had 27,000 km of rail in 1949 compared to 55,000 km of rail in India in 1947, but 50 years later, China has more rails; in 2012 it is even 98,000km vs. 65,000 km (and China has more electrified rails too). The Chinese went through 6 rounds of "speed up" campaigns from 1997 to 2007, lifting top operation speed to 250km/h on most major rails, and they built the world's longest HSR network (more than the rest combined) in four years and still the network is expanding as we speak. About half of the 27,000 km of rail in China in 1949 were built by the Japanese in Manchuria, but I don't recall anyone saying that these rails were a gift from Japan. If you want to see some other examples on a smaller scale, you could always check out South Korea.
From your comment I can see that you are contented with the vertical comparison of historical Indian railway data, but whether you realize it or not, the world is moving at a much faster pace.
Commenting on some other nation on the basis of some random figures n assumption is very easy when u don't know about the ground realities of that nation.
In ur first post ur were crying that Indians didn't invested anything in their railways n talking as if we r still using 1950s system, all this without even doing an iota of research on the topic.
Yes, I m proud of my nation n its railways for what its has achieved but that doesn't mean i don't realise that we have still a long way to go, only if were n Indian u would have seen what i have seen, today most trains runs on time(+- 1-2hr at max), Internet bookings n centralised system has helped people immensely, there r many new affordable AC n double decker trains running today for common people.
We r also stablishing mordern systems likes metros in nearly a dozen of cities n also planning to introduce High Speed trains on some of the routes.
I do admire what Chinese have achieved in such short period of time. Look brother every country is different n China had the economy to support such an expansion(today there economy is literally 4 times that of ours) where China stood in the early 2000s India stands at there today n Railways is also part of that economy n it'll also expand proportionately as the economy grows.
We just can't put China type system overnight here as our Railways will go bankrupt n neither our general people would be able to afford such a system(4 times per capita income rem).
I could have easily countered ur comparision by comparing our railways with our various neighbouring economies who also inherited the same system from the British n even have similar per capita Income today. But i won't bcoz i don't think it would be right as they r facing different internal n external factors then ours n neither i m interested in some d!ck measuring competion here like some people...