Energon
SENIOR MEMBER
- Joined
- Oct 26, 2007
- Messages
- 1,077
- Reaction score
- 0
This has more to do with money than anything else. For developing nations these sorts of operations just aren't economically feasible; heck the cost of an LGB is way higher than what many officers make in a year let along putting it on an aircraft and have it circling around all day long just in case if it needs to be called in. Also, there aren't constant air/space borne assets like UAVs and complex satellite networks offering total coverage, and most of all human life is far more expendable. I'm not saying that there are no back up air strikes using precision guided munition; sure there are; but unlike in the cases of US and most other NATO forces its not the standard operating procedure.How do you know that the doctrine is nothing alike? Can't Pakistan not be working to get to a similar Air-land doctrine where the infantry units on the ground can call upon the PAF for strikes? I already know that FACs with the units are integrated...this is going on for Cobra operations so why not for the PAF?
For the Pakistan forces to effectively combat this problem they will have to rely more on their manpower and have a high number of boots on the ground. But this is only half the problem, what is far more urgent is for the people to be given healthy alternatives to radicalism.
In all honesty I do not see this happening any time soon. Pakistan is fairly indebted to the US, and IMO it would be just as bad if they were to hurry up and attempt to replace one benefactor with another (China). Mind you, I'm highly against the US having rental states in the first place, only because except for a few atypical examples (Japan, West Germany and maybe the UAE), most client states have ended up becoming problematic, and hotbeds of crime and radicalism (primarily on account of disenchantment with puppet governments). It is going to take a lot of time and effort for Pakistan to move away from this position. There are no quick fixes. My point is that if aid is to be sought in the mean time, it'd much rather be diverted to the social sector than anything else.Neo said:I disagree on the 'rental state' part. US' handouts come under EDA programme as reward for our support in WoT, we're partners helping eachother.
Pakistan is in transition and no longer depends on US' weapons, China's ready to fill in the gap. Thats exactly the reason why we're getting US weapons without being compromising our integrity.
We'll never be in position of sebservience the way we did a decade ago.
Last edited: