I had army frieds from Rawalpindi who fought during Kargil war and its their words.
I rarher beleive them than some internet commentors.
It's not my commentary.... please do find a single shred of evidence of any declaration, treaty, ceasefire mandated by both countries.
The official response of pakistani government was that belligernts in the combat were Indian army and independent mujhideens...
If pakistan signs any ceasefire, that means it represents militant organisations like lashkar e taibba, jaish e muhamod harakat ul ansar, Harkat-ul-Mujahideen al bandr etc which were reported to occupy kargil....
What your interpretation points is (from the informed opinion of the your friends in rawalpindi), that pakistan apparently did the bidding for terrorists.....
So there can be two scenarios:
1> there was no ceasefire agreement, as i am aware of. India did not sign any ceasefire document and neither did pakistan, making territorial cleansing of insurgents legitimate (also endorsed by pakistan, as there was no interference to bombing operations )
2> your alleged, ceasefire agreement of pakistan on behalf of terror outfits (mujhideens), which implies pakistan as a conspirator for infiltration across the LOC and in violation of the signed shimla agreement which reads
"In Jammu and Kashmir, the line of control resulting from the ceasefire of December 17, 1971, shall be respected by both sides without prejudice to the recognized position of either side. Neither side shall seek to alter it unilaterally, irrespective of mutual differences and legal interpretations."
Logic seems to be under-rated... isn't it?
Musharraf was exposed by his own Lt. Generals.
if we are covering your naked then give some credit to us
