What's new

British reduced India to one of the poorest countries: Shashi Tharoor

Status
Not open for further replies.
Whoever cares more about Nation and its People is Welcomed .
Please try to look beyond Religion .



They have been speaking a different language for 2000 years . Even my people speak language which isn't Hindi .
What's your point ?

Ya Brits couldn't unite Europe but United India .
:D
Its Indians who united India :enjoy:
Brits divided it into India and Pakistan by poisoning the minds of its people .

If You claim that Islam was a British false flag operation to split India,
You are probably going to get banned ;-)

India had a large population and agrarian economics.
When Great Britain started to industrialize, the Indian economy lost out due
to beeing to expensive, so even if India had not been colonized, the economy would
have taken a hit.
 
The idea of Pakistani people existed since 500,000 BCE but the country came into existance in 1947.
Proof? There were two legged guy's wearing clothes eating with left hands building structurs in Riwat near Pakistan'i future capital Islamabad - they were proto-Pakistani's. The Soanian's were early Pakistani man. Later they would go on to build Harrapa and mohenjo Daro. Much later in 1947 they made the country we call Pakistan. It was 500, 000 year journey.



1920px-Soan_near_Adiala.JPG



link > https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Soanian
 
Why did Britain call its company as British India east India and so on. And what was India before British came?

It's a fact that India became united "after" British came and btw if you were Chinese then who did Huensang visit?

India is a land like Persia, Arabia. It's a geographical expression. Huensang visited a geographical expression called India.
 
Why did Britain call its company as British India east India and so on. And what was India before British came?

It's a fact that India became united "after" British came and btw if you were Chinese then who did Huensang visit?

Christoper Columbus was trying to find the way to India in 1492.
 
Proof? There were two legged guy's wearing clothes eating with left hands building structurs in Riwat near Pakistan'i future capital Islamabad - they were proto-Pakistani's. The Soanian's were early Pakistani man. Later they would go on to build Harrapa and mohenjo Daro. Much later in 1947 they made the country we call Pakistan. It was 500, 000 year journey.



1920px-Soan_near_Adiala.JPG



link > https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Soanian
:lol::lol::lol:

Your statement is on the same level with the person who made the statement that Pakistan existed during Jurassic Era because Pakisaurus lived in Pakistan during that time .

And plz using my argument on me .
Pakistan and Indian share same Cultural heritage though like 2 nagging offspring , have split the Mother land into 2 er 3 .
 
Why did Columbus was looking for India? Why did the British call their company India? For the same reason we call something Asia. Asia is just a geographical concept. If tomorrow Myanmar changes it's name to 'Asia' it can't claim it has been around since dawn of time because the Greeks talked of Asia. Similarly India ws like Balkans, Scandanavia etc. Only in 1947 did it become a nation state amnd is as artificial as Pakistan. Only it used a name that had been around for long time but that name had differant meanings in the past.

And Britain "Made India". This is a fact beyond any doubt. No Britain. No India. They made India at the cost of British blood. Then British writers spread the idea of India across the world. Even today most sources for referance on 'India' are English writers from 18th or 19th centuries. Even Greek texts were translated by these guys who used 18th century reality to translate those ancients which went on to inform what is now called 'India'.

For example this is India early 1800s. What is now Pakistan is not even part of it. Had Britain not botherd to invade anymore lands this is what your India would have looked like. You would not need to worry about Britain dividing your colony as it wopuld need no dividing because it did not even exist.


British%20India%201800.gif
 
Last edited:
If You claim that Islam was a British false flag operation to split India,
You are probably going to get banned ;-)

India had a large population and agrarian economics.
When Great Britain started to industrialize, the Indian economy lost out due
to beeing to expensive, so even if India had not been colonized, the economy would
have taken a hit.

British killed Industry and Agriculture of India .
They forced Indians to grow cash Crops which resulted in worst Famines in Bengal .
They imposed heavy taxes on Indians . Which were even worse than those taxes imposed by tyrant rulers .
 
:lol::lol::lol:

Your statement is on the same level with the person who made the statement that Pakistan existed during Jurassic Era because Pakisaurus lived in Pakistan during that time .

And plz using my argument on me .
Pakistan and Indian share same Cultural heritage though like 2 nagging offspring , have split the Mother land into 2 er 3 .
May have a point
Before the British, the US and Canada had natives living their.
 
Why did Columbus was looking for India? Why did the British call their company India? For the same reason we call something Asia. Asia is just a geographical concept. If tomorrow Myanmar changes it's name to 'Asia' it can't claim it has been around since dawn of time because the Greeks talked of Asia.

OKEY OKEY .

You people used to be Indian before Independence but Now your are Pakistani and we all are proud of You .
1000 years from Now , Neither the name India will exist nor the name Pakistan but Humans will still be roaming around these lands . God blessed Animals by not giving them the idea of naming .

The Great Bengal Famine of 1770 (Bengali: ৭৬-এর মন্বন্তর, Chhiattōrer monnōntór; lit The Famine of '76) was a famine between 1769 and 1773 .

I think you got the dates wrong ??? or Not

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Great_Bengal_famine_of_1770
 
I have been reading 'Geography of Herodtus' and the remarkable thing is he regards Europe as Greece with modern Turkey as Asia. His definition of Asia is modern day Turkey, Iraq, Syria, Iran, Palestine, Israel, Afghanistan, Pakistan and even Egypt. Today many in USA equate Asia with Far East. In 2016 it would deception for Japanese to claim when Herodotus' mention Asia he refers to them.

We have to look at the meaning of anything within it's historical context and times. If my name Ali it does not mean every time I read of a Ali in history it refers to me. There have been many iterations of Ali.

Link > https://archive.org/stream/geographyofherod00whee#page/200/mode/2up

@terry5 Are you a Ganga faggot going as a false flagger?

Talking of the name India do you people know there was Dutch East India Company and they had a colony. Guess what it was called 'Dutch East India"?

Territorial_Evolution_of_the_Dutch_East_Indies.png




* Nederlands -Indië - In Dutch.
* Hindia Belanda - in Indonesian.

Are you guy's going to claim that also as India because it was called 'India;?

Link > https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dutch_East_Indies
 
There was never a country called India before the British invasion. The subcontinent was only somewhat united under some empires but was mostly ethnically divided kingdoms. The subcontinent is basically a continent like Africa in itself and is made of different cultures and people. Pakistanis are as Indian as French are Romans.
 
If You claim that Islam was a British false flag operation to split India,
You are probably going to get banned ;-)

India had a large population and agrarian economics.
When Great Britain started to industrialize, the Indian economy lost out due
to beeing to expensive, so even if India had not been colonized, the economy would
have taken a hit.

This correct. Further on, it was spices that contributed to india's GDP during the Age of Sail. Spices were worth more then gold back then and it was also the time when refrigeration was still not invented.

European countries came all the way to Hindustan becauses of spices(Spice Route). The only things she had that were in high demand globally were spices. The returns for 1 single cargo of spices were 400%-500% of the total capital invested- in European center of trade cities like Amsterdam(read this before somewhere in a dutch colonial economics article- im a Dutchphile)

So the golden question now is:

Can India still get rich on exporting spices today?

Hahahahaha
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom