British Monarchy, time to end, no?

[INDIC]

Britain tried to be republic but it didn't work for them and they returned back to constitutional monarchy.

 

[Dubious]

You forget that the Crown no longer makes any rules. The House of Commons and the House of Lords have the power to change any wording in the British constitution and Anthem and Constitutional set-up should they so choose. Why aren't they doing anything about it, being elected representatives of the people? The simplest answer to this is because the people don't really have a problem with the existing set-up. They have no qualms saying they owe their allegiance to the Crown than to the Nation, knowing fully well that it's all lip-service at the end of the day.

Oh yea and here's your reply regarding the monarch's influence of the colonies/ territories:

The monarchy of the United Kingdom, commonly referred to as the British monarchy, is the constitutional monarchy of the United Kingdom and its overseas territories. The monarch's title is "King" (male) or "Queen" (female).

The monarch and his or her immediate family undertake various official, ceremonial, diplomatic and representational duties. As the monarchy is constitutional, the monarch is limited to non-partisan functions such as bestowing honours and appointing the Prime Minister. The monarch is, by tradition, commander-in-chief of the British Armed Forces. Though the ultimate formal executive authority over the government of the United Kingdom is still by and through the monarch's royal prerogative, these powers may only be used according to laws enacted in Parliament and, in practice, within the constraints of convention and precedent.

The sovereign is the Supreme Governor of the established Church of England. Archbishops and bishops are appointed by the monarch, on the advice of the Prime Minister, who chooses the appointee from a list of nominees prepared by a Church Commission. The Crown's role in the Church of England is titular; the most senior clergyman, the Archbishop of Canterbury, is the spiritual leader of the Church and of the worldwide Anglican Communion.
There are 13 monarchies in the Americas; that is: self-governing states and territories in North and South America where supreme power resides with an individual, who is recognised as the head of state. Each is a constitutional monarchy, wherein the sovereign inherits his or her office, usually keeps it until death or abdication, and is bound by laws and customs in the exercise of their powers. Ten of these monarchies are independent states, and equally share QueenElizabeth II — who resides primarily in the United Kingdom — as their respective sovereign, making them part of a global grouping known as the Commonwealth realms, while the remaining three are dependencies of European monarchies. As such, none of the monarchies in the Americas has a resident monarch.

Bascially, just because the Queen literally ties the Brits with the rest of the world (by being the monarch of other countries...) ...it makes the monarchy famous and well liked...

Otherwise, like you said they have no power hence why anyone in the 21st century who openly voice against the Monarchies of Middle east would want a monarchy?

But just because something is happening for a long time and out of habit someone does nothing...doesnt mean it is right...Then again their land their rule...

But apparently some do feel to stop such monarchies which have no power in their own country but want to have colonies

 

[Indischer]

Oh yea and here's your reply regarding the monarch's influence of the colonies/ territories:

The monarchy of the United Kingdom, commonly referred to as the British monarchy, is the constitutional monarchy of the United Kingdom and its overseas territories. The monarch's title is "King" (male) or "Queen" (female).

The monarch and his or her immediate family undertake various official, ceremonial, diplomatic and representational duties. As the monarchy is constitutional, the monarch is limited to non-partisan functions such as bestowing honours and appointing the Prime Minister. The monarch is, by tradition, commander-in-chief of the British Armed Forces. Though the ultimate formal executive authority over the government of the United Kingdom is still by and through the monarch's royal prerogative, these powers may only be used according to laws enacted in Parliament and, in practice, within the constraints of convention and precedent.

The sovereign is the Supreme Governor of the established Church of England. Archbishops and bishops are appointed by the monarch, on the advice of the Prime Minister, who chooses the appointee from a list of nominees prepared by a Church Commission. The Crown's role in the Church of England is titular; the most senior clergyman, the Archbishop of Canterbury, is the spiritual leader of the Church and of the worldwide Anglican Communion.
There are 13 monarchies in the Americas; that is: self-governing states and territories in North and South America where supreme power resides with an individual, who is recognised as the head of state. Each is a constitutional monarchy, wherein the sovereign inherits his or her office, usually keeps it until death or abdication, and is bound by laws and customs in the exercise of their powers. Ten of these monarchies are independent states, and equally share QueenElizabeth II — who resides primarily in the United Kingdom — as their respective sovereign, making them part of a global grouping known as the Commonwealth realms, while the remaining three are dependencies of European monarchies. As such, none of the monarchies in the Americas has a resident monarch.

Bascially, just because the Queen literally ties the Brits with the rest of the world (by being the monarch of other countries...) ...it makes the monarchy famous and well liked...

Otherwise, like you said they have no power hence why anyone in the 21st century who openly voice against the Monarchies of Middle east would want a monarchy?

But just because something is happening for a long time and out of habit someone does nothing...doesnt mean it is right...Then again their land their rule...

But apparently some do feel to stop such monarchies which have no power in their own country but want to have colonies

The Leader of the Party which wins the most MPs in elections is elected the Prime Minister, innit? The ceremony, though, involves the Monarchy. As for the Archbishops, they're basically forwarded by the PM, and the Monarch merely agrees to this 'advice'. As you said, their Land their rules.

We too have a President who's head of the armed forces. But everyone knows it's the PM who wields all the power.Replace President with Queen, and Voila, we have the British setup. A constitutional monarchy is effectively a democracy. An absolute monarchy, on the other hand, is usually authotitarian and dictatorial.

 

[Dubious]

The Leader of the Party which wins the most MPs in elections is elected the Prime Minister, innit? The ceremony, though, involves the Monarchy. As for the Archbishops, they're basically forwarded by the PM, and the Monarch merely agrees to this 'advice'. As you said, their Land their rules.

We too have a President who's head of the armed forces. But everyone knows it's the PM who wields all the power.Replace President with Queen, and Voila, we have the British setup. A constitutional monarchy is effectively a democracy. An absolute monarchy, on the other hand, is usually authotitarian and dictatorial.

No doubt about the British set up ...

Democracy is a far cry...the word is really just an ideal thing of jig which needs to actually be as successful as proclaimed...

But yes...yup rubber stamp...

And just like the people of UK like their monarchy and have no prob with it...people in Middle east (at least majority) like theirs hence...according to you no one should raise any voice against anyone!

 

[scrumpy]

I can understand why a common British person would love the Monarchy. The bit is I don't understand why Australia, New Zealand, Canada and a host of other smaller countries still have the British queen as the head of state.

As for the British loving their monarchy, opinions may change dramatically once Prince Charles takes over the throne.

 

[Indischer]

No doubt about the British set up ...

Democracy is a far cry...the word is really just an ideal thing of jig which needs to actually be as successful as proclaimed...

But yes...yup rubber stamp...

And just like the people of UK like their monarchy and have no prob with it...people in Middle east (at least majority) like theirs hence...according to you no one should raise any voice against anyone!

I didn't say that. Questions must be asked to those who wield actual power, not to those who're reduced to ceremonial figure-heads.
Tony Blair is accountable for Britain's actions in the War on Terror, not the Queen. So, who're the ones that wield real power in absolute monarchies and dictatorships?

I can understand why a common British person would love the Monarchy. The bit is I don't understand why Australia, New Zealand, Canada and a host of other smaller countries still have the British queen as the head of state.

As for the British loving their monarchy, opinions may change dramatically once Prince Charles takes over the throne.

They're the biggest symbols of British imperial power, and maybe for this reason they're still held in good regard by the general public. The Maharaja of Mysore passed away recently. The entire State of Karnataka mourned at this loss. Now, why would we do that?

 

[Jungibaaz]

they are brainwashed idiots. though there are equal number of britishers who hate the monarchy !!

That's not true.

Most and the vast majority of Brits like their monarchy and even more still want them around. Albeit, some might ask for cut backs in the luxury. But the monarchy is part of the history, heritage and identity. It's here to stay.

British monarchy is loved by majority of British people. Just their name and prestige brings millions of tourists into London to see the Buckingham Palace.

The Queen doesn't steal money from people and runs away to Saudi Arabia. PTI trolls should be more worried about the current King of Pakistan His Highness Nawaz Sharif Bin Khota.

Hear, hear! Long live the Queen.

 

[Kompromat]

Try 'visiting' Pakistan, but aana 'khushboo laga kay'

 

[Indischer]

@Jaanbaz @Jungibaaz For a long time, I'd get confused between you two. Now that one of you is a Camel, things are much less complicated.

 

[Amaa'n]

Try 'visiting' Pakistan, but aana 'khushboo laga kay'

Idk what do you mean here.....perhaps trying to promote the monarchy of NS we have in Pakistan???

 

[Jungibaaz]

@Jaanbaz @Jungibaaz For a long time, I'd get confused with you two. Now that one of you is a Camel, things are much less complicated.

Yeah, no kidding. Similar names, same flags, very similar views.

 

[VCheng]

Try 'visiting' Pakistan, but aana 'khushboo laga kay'

Is that why cricket teams have stopped going to Pakistan?

 

[AUSTERLITZ]

Lol,monarchy is part of the british tradition and culture.And they are not corrupt either.It provides prestige and glamour to england.

 

[Indischer]

Is that why cricket teams have stopped going to Pakistan?

My team is ready I guess....khushboo lagake, of course.

 

[Jaanbaz]

Oh yea just 2 yrs ago the Queen's bank was :
Money 'laundering' at the Queen's bank: Coutts fined £8.75m for taking despots' millions
Money 'laundering' at the Queen's bank: Coutts fined £8.75m for taking despots' millions | Mail Online
UK Queen fined for money laundering- Elizabeth in hot seat?
UK Queen fined for money laundering- Elizabeth in hot seat? | AUSINFORMER
Queen trusting the wrong people? Or letting her minions take the fall? I have nothing against her...just saying...the news was a lot of surprise..From drugs trafficking to unknown overseas money laundering
As for NS...you can topple him for all I care and why am I associated with PTI?

Queen was laundering money? It was probably some corrupt bankers working for the bank. Queen is all ready rich enough. And where will she go with the money? to Pakistan?

And i wasn't referring to you when i said PTI trolls.