What's new

BRITAIN’S MASS MURDER OF INDIGENOUS AUSTRALIANS (ABORIGINES)

Valid point. But still you stolen their Freedom, a concept which you cherish too much and which you defend. Isn't it ?
what the fu** is valid in this point. If a group of people is living freely on a piece of land without dividing it, it means any one can go there and capture the land and divide it and kill the native people just because they did not wanted to restrict each other,s freedom??? :o::o::hitwall::angry:. come on man use some common sense and show some respect for those hundreds of thousands of innocent soles.

They believed in the communal ownership of land. If land belongs to everybody then how can the first person who claims it for himself be stealing it?
so you mean to say that if someone by force occupies a public place it means that peace of land now belongs to him and also that someone ins not native and coming from another country. what a BS logic.

They died of smallpox.
 
. .
what the fu** is valid in this point. If a group of people is living freely on a piece of land without dividing it, it means any one can go there and capture the land and divide it and kill the native people just because they did not wanted to restrict each other,s freedom??? :o::o::hitwall::angry:. come on man use some common sense and show some respect for those hundreds of thousands of innocent soles.

All land, now owned by someone, started off as such land.
It is the 10,000 year old conflict between Hunter-Gatherers and Farmers.

Who is the owner of the natural resources? Noone?
This means that if you own ANYTHING, you are either a thief or a fence...

The human race has seen the benefit to the race of allowing private property,
and the Farmers won.

Judging people by anything than the prevailing laws at the time is silly.
At the time, conquest by war was an accepted method of becoming rich,
and have been so until finally things started to happen in the 20th century.

The changes that international relations should be based on law,
is much a Western concept. Don't forget that.
 
. .
Damn, these crimes make ISIS look like apprentices in genocide.
 
.
Just wanted to take the time , and light a candle for ABORIGINES
They really suffered great tragic , genocide


Instead of making the people live better lives with sharing knowledge , gifts and bounty British decided to take land , and push the original people deep into desert land


People claim in europe Neanderthals just vanished , when we have proof of genoicde by
weapons bearing nations

572906-malcolm-burns-jnr-and-joe-gala.jpg
 
Last edited:
.
Its pretty much well known if you posess an IQ over 70.





I dont think a handful of British sailors and convicts can wipe out a gigantic nations populace, disease can wipe out any populace fairly quickly though.

The thing about Australia is that it was never really that populated to begin with and the native population is most likely the highest it has been in history.

Its just the way of tribes, look at Indians treatment of the Andamanese tribes, theres a highway going through one of the main villages and people have been taking photos of them, making them work for food etc and this is recent, you cant stay isolated without bad things happening eventually.

Disease and Expolitation Threaten Indigenous Andaman Island Tribe | Latest News | Earth Island Journal | Earth Island Institute

See that for example, this is recent i.e past few years and its one of the few tribes that know exists in the modern age and Indians are building resorts next to the reserve, exploiting the small populace that is left, trying to take the natural resources off the Island and with a big highway running through it are interacting and destroying their land. Sure its small scale but its pretty much the same shit. Except its now the 21st century and we are a globally connected society as opposed to back then when it took a year on a boat to get to a place like Australia and chances are you die on the journey.

You keep believing in those fairy tales. We know better.
 
. .
I think I watched a documentary where the white government stole children from "Abrorigional" families

article-1210009-0633B992000005DC-917_468x286.jpg


Called savages for showing their kids to hunt wild life and survive the wild however themsleves the british love camping and living in outback and becoming boy scouts

Not sure why these folks are not compensated billions of dollars for crime against humanity

If anything Aborigionals are owed 500-800 Billion dollars , due to war crimes committed against their culture etc they can use the money to preserve their culture


maxresdefault.jpg


Before the colonist showed up , night life would have been really different for the Aborigionals of Australia sleeping under the stars in out back , being one with the nature , hunter gatherers

Not yet aware of farming techniques believing nature is for all around them

Abundance of wild life around them to keep them full in day time
 
Last edited:
.
I think I watched a documentary where the white government stole children from "Abrorigional" families

article-1210009-0633B992000005DC-917_468x286.jpg


Called savages for showing their kids to hunt wild life and survive the wild however themsleves the british love camping and living in outback and becoming boy scouts

Not sure why these folks are not compensated billions of dollars for crime against humanity

If anything Aborigionals are owed 500-800 Billion dollars , due to war crimes committed against their culture etc they can use the money to preserve their culture


maxresdefault.jpg


Before the colonist showed up , night life would have been really different for the Aborigionals of Australia sleeping under the stars in out back , being one with the nature , hunter gatherers

Not yet aware of farming techniques believing nature is for all around them

Abundance of wild life around them to keep them full in day time

Meanwhile, Black Americans can sue Arab Nations for their part in the slave market trade.
With U.S. punitive damages, I am sure most Arab countries would go bankrupt.

Greece could sue Turkey for the occupation of Konstantinopel, and the rest of the Byzantine Empire.
They could also sue the Arabs for the occupation of Palestine.
There goes Saudi-Arabia. poor beggers, they will be.

Spain could sue the Saudi-Arabia over the occupation of Southern Spain.

Persia could sue Greece for the behaviour of Alexander the Great.
And so on, and so forth.

Or, work on improving human rights everywhere.
Pakistan is not exactly at the top here.
 
.
Valid point. But still you stolen their Freedom, a concept which you cherish too much and which you defend. Isn't it ?

what the fu** is valid in this point. If a group of people is living freely on a piece of land without dividing it, it means any one can go there and capture the land and divide it and kill the native people just because they did not wanted to restrict each other,s freedom??? :o::o::hitwall::angry:. come on man use some common sense and show some respect for those hundreds of thousands of innocent soles.



Bro, thanks to clarify what i was thinking,

But iwhat written is based on the current right of propery which exits since many years in different societies.
 
.
see they are paying for it. brits are slowly becoming minority into their own country and their colonies (US,Canada/Punjabistan :lol:, NZ and Australia) they already lost SOuth Africa.

low of carma whites feelit ! :lol:
 
.
Meanwhile, Black Americans can sue Arab Nations for their part in the slave market trade.
With U.S. punitive damages, I am sure most Arab countries would go bankrupt.

Greece could sue Turkey for the occupation of Konstantinopel, and the rest of the Byzantine Empire.
They could also sue the Arabs for the occupation of Palestine.
There goes Saudi-Arabia. poor beggers, they will be.

Spain could sue the Saudi-Arabia over the occupation of Southern Spain.

Persia could sue Greece for the behaviour of Alexander the Great.
And so on, and so forth.

Or, work on improving human rights everywhere.
Pakistan is not exactly at the top here.

Don't worry too much about Pakistan and take care of your own problems. We didn't exterminate hundreds and thousands of people and steal their land despite all our other problems.

We know it hurts white folks reminding them of their past. You like to selectively compensate those that you think you hold dear. In reality, it are just extreme guilt feelings. Those who don't mean a thing to you are forgotten. In fact, history is altered to fit the narrative like we have also seen in this discussion.
 
Last edited:
.
Don't worry too much about Pakistan and take care of your own problems. We didn't exterminate hundreds and thousands of people and steal their land despite all our other problems.

We know it hurts white folks reminding them of their past. You like to selectively compensate those that you think you hold dear. In reality, it are just extreme guilt feelings. Those who don't mean a thing to you are forgotten. In fact, history is altered to fit the narrative like we have also seen in this discussion.

Guilt for what? Don't think We have any reason for guilt.
It was not exactly Sweden, which built Colonial Empires.

I just give a few examples to show that You should not behave like an elephant in a glass shop.

History of mankind is a history of wars. Precolonial India was not exactly peaceful.

When Pakistan and India was created, it was a period of Genocide and Ethnic Cleansing,
with 100s of thousands exterminated, and millions forced to flee.
Was the land owned by the refugees not stolen?
Indians certainly believe that Pakistan stole part of Kashmir.

Maybe you try to forget that, due to guilt.

Better focus on the future.
 
.
Give it a rest with this topics already :disagree:

Britain was a colonial power because it was successful and it could impose it's will on other people (and kill them, since you brought it up). That's the way the world works, nasty as it sounds.

Does that make them "evil"? Or does that make them more "evil" then the Arabs, Turks, Chinese, Mongols, Japanese, etc, who all did the same thing on different scales?
Surely not. History doesn't work like that.
 
.
Back
Top Bottom