What's new

Brexit: EU leaders back Theresa May's deal in Brussels

Kailash Kumar

SENIOR MEMBER
Joined
Oct 8, 2018
Messages
4,643
Reaction score
-1
Country
Suriname
Location
Netherlands
Brexit: EU leaders back Theresa May's deal in Brussels

Summit offers unanimous support while marking ‘moment of deep sadness’

25 Nov 2018

5477.jpg

Jean-Claude Juncker, the president of the European commission, before the meeting of the European council to endorse the draft Brexit withdrawal agreement.

EU leaders have given their backing to the Brexit deal struck with Theresa May, firing the starting pistol on the prime minister’s race to win parliamentary approval in time for the UK’s withdrawal next March.

At an extraordinary summit in Brussels, the bloc’s 27 heads of state and government took a decisive and historic step towards sealing the terms of Britain’s split from Brussels after 45 years of membership.

Unanimous support was given to the terms of a voluminous draft withdrawal treaty, covering citizens’ rights, the £39bn divorce bill, and the Irish border issue, along with a 26-page political declaration setting out the basis of the future relationship.

In a statement, the EU’s leaders stated their intention to build “as close as possible a partnership” with the UK after Brexit, while warning that they would be “permanently seized” in future negotiations by the principle that countries outside the bloc cannot enjoy the same rights as those within.

Brussels has already rejected the proposals thrashed out this summer at Chequers, the prime minister’s country retreat, to achieve “frictionless trade” in goods after Brexit.

Further statements issued on Sunday morning by the 27 EU leaders laid out their intention to maintain the rights of European fleets to fish in British waters.

There was a thinly veiled threat to block any transition extension unless a new arrangement with Brussels was swiftly agreed by the government.

Arriving at the summit, the EU’s chief negotiator, Michel Barnier, nevertheless advised MPs to vote for the deal on the table, suggesting that a “no” vote could damage negotiations on the future relationship.

“Now it is time for everybody to take their responsibilities, everybody,” he said. The deal was “a necessary step to build the trust between the UK and the EU” to build “an unprecedented and ambitious future partnership”.

The European commission president, Jean-Claude Juncker, said: “I would vote in favour of this deal because this is the best deal possible for Britain.

“I’m sad because watching the UK … leaving the EU is not a moment for jubilation but a moment of deep sadness and we make everything possible in order to have this divorce being as smooth as possible. but there are no smooth divorces.

“This is the deal, it’s the best deal possible and the EU will not change its fundamental position when it comes to this issue so I do think the British parliament – because this is a wise parliament – will ratify this deal.”

The French president, Emmanuel Macron described it as “not a day to celebrate”, while the Dutch prime minister, Mark Rutte, warned MPs no better deal was on offer from the EU, urging them to back the agreements the May was bringing back to parliament.

“If I would live in the UK I would say yes to this, I would say that this is very much acceptable to the United Kingdom,” Rutte said, because the deal “limited the impacts of Brexit while balancing the vote to leave”. In a bid to help the prime minister, he said May had “fought very hard” and now there was “an acceptable deal on the table”.

“You know I hate [Brexit] but it is a given,” he told reporters. “No one is a victor here today, nobody is winning, we are all losing.”

May will hope that the leaders’ endorsement of the terms of the UK’s divorce will mark the end of nearly 18 months of arduous negotiations, during which the prime minister has survived cabinet resignations and an attempted coup by Brexiters on her own back-benches.

Should the withdrawal agreement be ratified in Westminster and the European parliament, it is further agreed that the UK will stay in the single market and customs union, without representation in any decision-making institutions, for a 21-month-long transition period following withdrawal on the 29 March 2019.

An extension of that period of “up to one or two years” is foreseen should the negotiations over the future relationship not be completed by the end of 2020.

May must now return to the cut and thrust of parliamentary politics in Westminster, as she battles to convince MPs, including many in her own party, to back her painstakingly negotiated deal in the “meaningful vote”.

In her open letter to the British public published on Sunday, May promised to campaign “with my heart and soul to win that vote and to deliver this Brexit deal”.

She said the vote would take place in “a few weeks”. Opposition whips expect the government to announce the date this week – with the betting at Westminster on 10 or 11 December, just before the next scheduled meeting of EU leaders in Brussels. There are likely to be upwards of 30 hours of debate in the deeply divided House of Commons, over the course of several days.

With more than 80 of the prime minister’s own party having publicly expressed scepticism about the deal, and Labour pledged to oppose it – barring a likely handful of rebels – May faces a formidable challenge in winning the vote. Yet losing it would plunge Britain into what May herself has called, “deep and grave uncertainty”.

The EU is keenly aware that the British parliament could reject the deal, but want to show the bloc was able to make an offer to the UK.

The agreement had appeared at risk in the days leading up to the summit, when Spain’s prime minister, Pedro Sánchez, threatened to withhold supportunless Britain conceded that the British overseas territory of Gibraltar, over which the Spanish have a long-running territorial claim, would be covered by a future trade deal only with Madrid’s consent.

The British ambassador to the EU, Sir Tim Barrow, gave that commitment in a letter on Saturday afternoon, prompting outrage across the political spectrum by what was described as a “betrayal” of the Rock.

Asked how Spain’s threatened “veto” was solved, Lithuania’s president, Dalia Grybauskaitė, said as she arrived at the summit: “Usually there are some tricks, we promise to promise.”

EU leaders see the summit as a sombre moment. “There is nothing good for any side because it is withdrawal from the European Union,” Grybauskaitė added.

The European parliament also has to give its consent to the deal, which is expected in January, according to its president, Antonio Tajani. “We will vote for the agreement, there is a majority in favour”, he said. “This is a message to our friends in the British parliament: this is a good agreement for both.”

https://www.theguardian.com/politic...ers-back-theresa-mays-brexit-deal-in-brussels
 
Brexit deal explained: backstops, trade and citizens' rights

The EU has agreed on May’s 585-page withdrawal agreement. Here are the main issues

25 Nov 2018

After 524 days of negotiations, Theresa May and the EU’s other 27 heads of state and government have agreed a deal to be put in front of the UK and European parliaments for ratification ahead of Britain’s withdrawal on 29 March 2019.

There is a 585-page withdrawal agreement, which will form the basis of a legally binding treaty, and a 26-page political declaration on the future relationship. The second document does not have legal force, but it politically binds both sides to some basic parameters in the future talks. Here is what has been agreed in Brussels:

The withdrawal agreement
The three main issues dealt with in the withdrawal agreement are citizens rights, the £39bn divorce deal and the problem of avoiding a border on the island of Ireland after Brexit.

Citizens’ rights

The deal safeguards the rights for over 3 million EU citizens in the UK, and over 1 million UK nationals in EU countries to stay and continue their current activities in the place in which they have made their home. Theresa May had sought to limit the scope of the deal to those who arrived in the UK before the 29 March 2019, but she lost out. All those arriving to live in the UK at any point up until the end of the transition period, which could last until the end of 2022 should it be extended, will enjoy the rights that EU nationals have today to make Britain their home, to live, work and study.


Divorce bill


It had been feared that the UK’s exit bill could scupper the negotiations. David Davis, the former Brexit secretary, told the European commission president, Jean-Claude Juncker, early on in the talks that there was nothing in the EU’s treaties to suggest that the British government owed any money. Juncker responded that the EU was “not a golf club”, and that Britain would have to come good on the spending commitments it made as a member state. Huge figures circulated, with some totting up gross liabilities to be £100bn. That prompted the then foreign secretary, Boris Johnson, to suggest Brussels could “go whistle” for its money. An agreement was finally made last November that the UK would stump up around £39bn, to cover its contribution to the EU budget until 2020, and accumulated other outstanding commitments such as pensions for EU officials.

Irish border

This has turned out to be the thorniest issue to settle in the Brexit divorce agreement and still causes the most unhappiness among Theresa May’s critics. The UK had initially proposed a technological solution but this was rebuffed by Ireland and EU officials as “magical thinking”. The EU initially proposed that Northern Ireland should in effect stay in the single market and customs union, prompting a furious response from the British prime minister. The EU moved its position. The core of the solution is the so-called backstop, an insurance plan that kicks in if future trade talks fail to avoid a hard border on the island of Ireland. The backstop means the whole UK will remain in the EU customs union, while Northern Ireland will have to follow single market rules. Brexit supporters loathe the backstop, fearing it will leave the UK ‘shackled’ to EU rules. Wary EU countries think the plan benefits the UK, so insisted the UK respect EU social and environmental rules to to avoid undercutting their companies.

Political declaration

The UK came into the negotiations determined to get a weighty political declaration that would easily translate into a full blown trade deal ready to come into force soon after Brexit day. The promise of the “easiest trade deal in history” soon hit the buffers. The UK has agreed a joint paper of just 26 pages outlining the parameters of the future relationship, with the two main pillars being trade and security. The paper offers lots of ideas about what might happen, but few concrete plans.

Trade and the city

The prime minister’s central policy priority in terms of trade was to secure a commitment to frictionless trade in goods through a common rulebook, the centrepiece of the Chequers plan. By stating that the UK and the EU would be “separate markets and distinct legal orders” after Brexit, the political declaration demolished it. British access to European markets will depend on the UK respecting EU standards on competition, tax, environment, as well as social and employment protection, but it is not clear whether that involves non-regression or dynamic alignment. The political declaration says the shared customs territory in the Northern Ireland backstop will be built on and improved in a future trade deal. The UK, bafflingly, insists this does not bind the British government to a customs union. Despite British demands for a bespoke deal on financial services, the UK will be treated like any other non-EU country. Instead of “passports” that allow the City of London to operate across the EU, bankers and traders will have to rely on “equivalence”, allowing market access to be withdrawn by Brussels at 30 days’ notice. There is a commitment to complete equivalence assessments by the middle of June 2020.

Foreign and security policy

The UK had hoped to not only maintain the current level of security and police cooperation but to even opt in to aspects of the EU’s structures that it had previously snubbed. That prompted Luxembourg’s prime minister, Xavier Bettel, to remark: “They were in with a load of opt-outs. Now they are out, and want a load of opt-ins.” The EU is only offering cooperation, rather than membership, of EU police agency Europol and judicial cooperation agency Eurojust. Despite its previous disdain for EU-level defence cooperation, Britain has negotiated clauses that will allow it to participate in EU joint defence projects. A major row during the Brexit negotiations was the European commission’s insistence that the UK defence industries would not be allowed to work on the most sensitive parts the EU’s £8bn Galileo satellite programme, to which British taxpayers have already paid £1bn. The UK has threatened to walk away and build its own satellite. The political declaration, in an example of its many vague clauses, limits its solution to 10 words. “The parties should consider appropriate arrangements for cooperation on space”, it says.

https://www.theguardian.com/politic...awal-agreement-trade-backstop-citizens-rights
 
I agree. It is shameful what the EU is proposing. No respect for the UK at all.

WTO terms is the best way forward. I can't believe the PM & her "team" are trying to sell it to the UK public.

Even the pompus arrogant little french twat.. oops Macron was "threatening to push the UK into the backstop, if they didnt get they way on fishing rights..".

The current PM is obviously the wrong person to take our country forward. The deal will be put forward, hopefully Parliment will reject it, and then she does the honourable thing and resigns and lets someone else take over. She is not fit for purpose at this time in our history.

nice website with coverage across all papers : https://brexitcentral.com/

todays coverage :

https://brexitcentral.com/today/brexit-news-monday-26-november/

Here you go : https://www.express.co.uk/news/uk/1...resa-May-withdrawal-deal-fishing-trade-latest

Its an EU trap. Pure and Simple..
 
The deal is dead in the water already, complete sell out bro, parliament will shoot this down quicker than a duck during hunting season.
Time to leave on WTO or what I prefer Canada plus.

Yah good British buddy of mine is absolutely livid at this situation...its not what he voted for (Brexit) at all...if "remain" won in the vote he was perfectly willing to accept the result and move on.....but this half-assed crap after the mandate given by the vote is absolutely BS!
 
Yah good British buddy of mine is absolutely livid at this situation...its not what he voted for (Brexit) at all...if "remain" won in the vote he was perfectly willing to accept the result and move on.....but this half-assed crap after the mandate given by the vote is absolutely BS!

Yep, total back peddling from one of the worst prime ministers in British history, only Blair and Major usurp her in her treason.
 
I agree. It is shameful what the EU is proposing. No respect for the UK at all.

WTO terms is the best way forward. I can't believe the PM & her "team" are trying to sell it to the UK public.

Even the pompus arrogant little french twat.. oops Macron was "threatening to push the UK into the backstop, if they didnt get they way on fishing rights..".

The current PM is obviously the wrong person to take our country forward. The deal will be put forward, hopefully Parliment will reject it, and then she does the honourable thing and resigns and lets someone else take over. She is not fit for purpose at this time in our history.

nice website with coverage across all papers : https://brexitcentral.com/

todays coverage :

https://brexitcentral.com/today/brexit-news-monday-26-november/

Here you go : https://www.express.co.uk/news/uk/1...resa-May-withdrawal-deal-fishing-trade-latest

Its an EU trap. Pure and Simple..

You should pity Theresa May having to deal with the sh*t those campaigning for the Brexit created. Many Brexiters were in her government,many didn't want to take their responsabilites (and their incompetence) in this mess and just fled.

But if you want,replace May,bring all the likes of Boris to the job so the situation becomes even funnier. (or sadder?)
 
You should pity Theresa May having to deal with the sh*t those campaigning for the Brexit created. Many Brexiters were in her government,many didn't want to take their responsabilites (and their incompetence) in this mess and just fled.

But if you want,replace May,bring all the likes of Boris to the job so the situation becomes even funnier. (or sadder?)

The Brexiters "left" / "fled" because Theresa May lied to them repeatly and backstabbed them all the time and they found out they were meant to be the front men for Theresa's lies..... Would you work under those circumstances. Theresa May has finally showed her true colours!

There was an opportunity for the EU to show respect and negotiate with respect, but instead they have spent the last 2 years trying to break up the UK. Fine, that is their choice.

All we need is someone to take us out of the EU, deal or no deal...

Now, it is time to say "au revoir to the EU(I will be polite)"..... and leave, and never look back.
 
You should pity Theresa May having to deal with the sh*t those campaigning for the Brexit created. Many Brexiters were in her government,many didn't want to take their responsabilites (and their incompetence) in this mess and just fled.

But if you want,replace May,bring all the likes of Boris to the job so the situation becomes even funnier. (or sadder?)

They walked away because she cut them out of the negotiations and had her main man Oly Robbins, a die hard Europhile write everything up and concede terms.
Anyway, if Macron thinks that he can keep us in backstop until we relinquish over his demands, or that idiot who runs Spain, who wants 'joint sovereignty' over Gibraltar, then they both have a another thing coming. This deal is not happening.
Time to walk away and leave our so called European allies to it.
 
"or that idiot who runs Spain, who wants 'joint sovereignty' over Gibraltar"

Well the Spanish can hope but they will never have Gibraltar.

Interesting during the Falklands war, the first ships to sail down to the South Atlantic were doing an exercise off Gibraltar
 
"or that idiot who runs Spain, who wants 'joint sovereignty' over Gibraltar"

Well the Spanish can hope but they will never have Gibraltar.

Interesting during the Falklands war, the first ships to sail down to the South Atlantic were doing an exercise off Gibraltar

So you say that Britain and Spain might have political tensions in the future after BREXIT due to the Gibraltar dispute?
 
So you say that Britain and Spain might have political tensions in the future after BREXIT due to the Gibraltar dispute?

Unlike Argentina, Spain is not stupid enough to try to ever think of invading Gibraltar.
 
Unlike Argentina, Spain is not stupid enough to try to ever think of invading Gibraltar.

Spain is much more powerful than Argentina you know. And UK isn't exactly at its military prime right now.

Invasion can be ruled out but as an EU member, Spain will push for making life difficult for UK.
 
Spain is much more powerful than Argentina you know. And UK isn't exactly at its military prime right now.

Invasion can be ruled out but as an EU member, Spain will push for making life difficult for UK.


Not really.

Argentine air-force was pretty powerful relative to UK in 1982 as they had nearly 200 relatively modern combat jets.
It's Navy was also decent as they had an aircraft carrier, 2 modern Type-42 destroyers and a couple of modern diesel submarines.
Not as powerful relatively to UK as Spain is now but not too far from it.

Big difference is that Spain is not that far from UK and so UK fighters can fight over Northern Spain with inflight refuelling.
Royal Navy is now immensely more powerful with it's Astute SSNs and Type-45 destroyers. When the 2 Queen Elizabeth carriers are fully operational next decade then the UK will even be able to go and hit Spain from the South Coast.
 

Country Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom