Breaking: PM Nawaz deliver big speech at United Nations New York

[jha]

Very balanced speech.... by his standards.

One about India's unacceptable preconditions ( Stop cross border terror ?) was the best line. Eulogizing burhan was very good too.

 

[Mughal-Prince]

Watch out people, theres a HUGE protest outside the UN about Baluchistan

View attachment 336574

a turnout of 4 people, is apparently "global embarrassment" in India

Take a look at them they are not even look like Makranis which are actually living near coastline of Pakistan and are not actual Balochi tribes men Most of them apparently Indians to me .

 

[Asian.Century]

FULL HD PM Pakistan speech at UN:

 

[iPhone]

It was a good speech but could have been better. Omission of Yadev was disappointing and so was not directly mentioning india's subversive activities in Blochistan.

But on the Kashmir front, Nawaz passes with flying colors. By mentioning Burhan Wani by name he shocked me. Mentioning his freedom struggle and the struggle of the Kashmiri youth against India was also nice to hear. There's no doubt that Kashmir issue has been reinvigorated.

So, overall I'm satisfied with the speech just a little disappointed that Blochistan was put on the back burner.

 

[Musafir117]

most people in the room where like

And we know the speech heard by the audience specially the stupid PM Modi ( as per Google search ) who scare to attend the meeting and trying to save his dirty azz at home
Well done PM Nawaz I know it was over than your capacity but you delivers well with meaningful breafing in start.

 

[AZADPAKISTAN2009]

This news will remain breaking for next 10 days now

 

[Musafir117]

China Backs Pakistan's Position on Kashmir: Li Tells Sharif


China Backs Pakistan's Position on Kashmir: Li Tells Sharif
IANS

First published: September 21, 2016, 10:06 PM IST | Updated: 1 hour ago

Chinese Premier Li Keqiang addresses the General Assembly at the United Nations . (Picture courtesy: Getty images)
New York: China on Wednesday hoped that there will be a better understanding of Pakistan's position on Kashmir by the international community and that Beijing attaches great importance to Islamabad's position on Kashmir.

This was conveyed by Chinese Premier Li Keqiang during his meeting with Pakistan Prime Minister Nawaz Sharif on the sidelines of the UNGA meet here on Wednesday, Geo News reported.

Chinese Premier said his country would stand with Pakistan. "We support Pakistan and will speak for Pakistan at every forum."

Stating that Pakistan was a victim of terrorism, the Chinese premier hoped the situation between India and Pakistan would not escalate. "We are ready to play constructive role in improvement of relations between Pakistan and India," the Chinese Premier added.

Li said China will stand with Pakistan; we support Pakistan and we will speak for Pakistan at every forum.

"We are thankful to Prime Minister Muhammad Nawaz Sharif for investing huge resources for the safety and security of Chinese personnel in Pakistan," Li Keqiang said, according to Geo.

Nawaz said that things are going well in Pakistan-China relations, and that the relationship has entered a different phase.

He thanked China for expressing concern regarding Indian atrocities in occupied Kashmir.

He said that Pakistan and China were "iron brothers".

The meeting came ahead of Sharif's address at the UNGA on Wednesday, where he is expected to flag the Kashmir issue.




http://www.news18.com/news/world/ch...ition-on-kashmir-li-tells-sharif-1294458.html

And this statement need millions of Burnols in India Thanks China

 

[war&peace]

I wish we had leader like ZAB at this point in time. He is delivering speech stoic and stolidly and void of any inspiration. Though the content is good and I'm sure Gen RS handed this speech to him during his meeting.

How would anyone take him seriously when the whole world knows his name is connected to money laundering and offshore companies?

That's why it is necessary to have a leader with spotless character to present the case of our nation. I remember how Berlusconi (Italy) was ridiculed and derided across EU until he stepped down for his involvement in corruption.

 

[Hulk]

Breaking: PM Nawaz to deliver hard hitting speech in United Nations.

While PM Modi of India dare not had the guts to visit UN General Assembly, where almost all the world countries are here to deliver their speeches.


Here is the FULL Speech:

STATEMENT BY PRIME MINISTER OF THE ISLAMIC REPUBLIC OF PAKISTAN

AT THE 71sT SESSION OF THE UNITED NATIONS GENERAL ASSEMBLY New York 21 September 2o16

Statement by His Excellency Mr. Muhammad Nawaz Sharif, Prime Minister of the Islamic Republic of Paldstan, at the General Debate of the 71st Session of the UN General Assembly 21 September 2016

Mr. President, Excellencies, Distinguished delegates, Ladies and Gentlemen.

We congratulate Mr. Peter Thomson on his election as President of the 7lst Session of the General Assembly. We agree that implementation of the Sustainable Development Agenda should be the focus of this Session. We also pay tribute to Mr. Mogens Lykketoft for his capable stewardship of the 70th Session.

Mr. President, Today, three decades after the end of the Cold War, our multipolar world is more free and vibrant, yet still chaotic and turbulent; more interdependent, but more unequal; more prosperous, yet stil! afflicted with poverty.

We see spectacular progress, but also unprecedented human suffering.

The world is at a historic inflection point.

The international order established after the Second World War is passing away, but a new order has yet to emerge.

Competition between the major powers is becoming more confrontational. This can pose serious threats to peace across Asia.

A new Cold War threatens to engulf Europe. The momentum there towards "greater union" has already reversed. Barricades and walls are going up, especially against the tide of misery flowing out of a turbulent Middle East. In many countries, intolerance has revived the ghosts of xenophobia and Islamophobia.

Turmoil is intensifying in the Middle East. International efforts to defeat Daesh are therefore urgent. For this, it is essential to reconcile the divergent objectives and priorities of regional and external powers.

Peace cannot be built when injustice prevails. The long festering tragedy of Palestine demands determined action by the international community

Mr. President,

After decades of strong growth, the world economy has reached a plateau.

Despite this adverse international economic environment, my government has, in three short years, moved the country towards robust growth.

We have fully integrated the 2030 Development Agenda into our own economic and social strategy.

This rests on our conviction that people are the true wealth of our nation and that it is human development, which will determine our future destiny.

Mr. President,

Our priority goal of economic development requires internal peace and stability.

My country has been the principal victim of terrorism including that supported, sponsored and financed from abroad.

We will not allow externally sponsored terrorism and threats of destabilization to cause turbulence in Pakistan.

Tens of thousands of our citizens and thousands of our security personnel have been killed or injured in terrorist attacks.

This has only reinforced our resolve to eliminate the scourge of terrorism. Our comprehensive strategy of law enforcement and targeted military operations has produced remarkable results and enabled Pakistan to turn the tide against terrorism. Pakistan's Zarb-e-Azb Operation is the largest, most robust and most successful anti-terrorism campaign anywhere in the world, deploying 200,000 of our security forces. Our comprehensive National Action Plan has the complete endorsement of our people and our Parliament as well as our security forces, all of whom have made heroic sacrifices to defeat terrorism

Mr. President,

Terrorism, however, is now a global phenomenon, which must be addressed comprehensively and in all its forms, including State terrorism.

The international community must coordinate its efforts to accomplish this. These efforts should be taken collectively and not unilaterally by the passage of any laws with extra-territorial application targeted against certain countries.

We will not win the fight against terrorism and violent extremism so long as we do not address their root causes. These lie in poverty and ignorance, political and social injustice and oppression, foreign intervention and occupation and denial of the legitimate rights of peoples and nations, especially the right to self-determination.

Until these underlying causes are addressed, it will be difficult to counter the twisted narrative of violent extremists and terrorists.

Mr. President,

After 15 years of the current war in Afghanistan, the international community agrees that the only road to a lasting peace in that country is through a dialogue between the Government in Kabul and the Afghan Taliban.

Pakistan has long proposed this as the most viable course to end decades of conflict and suffering in Afghanistan.

Based on this belief in a negotiated peace, and in response to requests from President Ashraf Ghani, we have been facilitating the process of reconciliation in Afghanistan.

There have been setbacks. That, however, is not a sufficient reason to abandon the path of peace and rely on the military option, which has failed, for the past decade and a half, to stabilize Afghanistan.

Progress will be assured only when the Afghan parties themselves conclude that there is no military solution to the Afghan war, and work assiduously, through a meaningful dialogue process, for achieving reconciliation and peace at home.

Mr. President,

Over three and a half decades of conflict and chaos in Afghanistan has had grave security and economic consequences for Pakistan. Almost three million Afghan refugees, to whom we opened our homes and hearts, remain in Pakistan. We hope to see them return to Afghanistan, voluntarily and with dignity. Until they do, the international community must shoulder its responsibilities to sustain them.


Mr. President,

Confrontation should not be our destiny in South Asia, Pakistan wants peace with India. I have gone the extra mile to achieve this, repeatedly offering a dialogue to address all outstanding issues.

But India has posed unacceptable preconditions to engage in a dialogue. Let us be clear: talks are no favor to Pakistan. Talks are in the interest of both countries. They are essential to resolve our differences, especially the Jammu and Kashmir dispute, and to avert the danger of any escalation. Mr. President, Peace and normalization between Pakistan and India cannot be achieved without a resolution of the Kashmir dispute. This is an objective evaluation, not a partisan position.

Our predictions have now been confirmed by events.

A new generation of Kashmiris has risen spontaneously against India's illegal occupation - demanding freedom from occupation. Burhan Wani, the young leader murdered by Indian forces, has emerged as the symbol of the latest Kashmiri Intifada, a popular and peaceful freedom movement, led by Kashmiris, young and old, men and women, armed only with an undying faith in the legitimacy of their cause, and a hunger for freedom in their hearts.

Mr. President,

This indigenous uprising of the Kashmiris has been met, as usual, with brutal repression by India's occupation force of over half a million soldiers.

Over a hundred Kashmiris have been killed, hundreds, including children and infants, blinded by shotgun pellets and over six thousand unarmed civilians injured over the past two months. These Indian brutalities are wel! documented.

I would like to inform the General Assembly that Pakistan will share with the Secretary General a dossier containing detailed information and evidence of the gross and systematic violations of human rights committed by Indian forces in occupied Jammu and Kashmir.

These brutalities wilt not suppress the spirit of the Kashmiris; it will only intensify their anger and fortify their determination to see India end its occupation of Kashmir.

From Srinagar to Sopore, the men, women and children come out each day, defying curfew, to demand freedom.

Mr. President,

Pakistan fully supports the demand of the Kashmiri people for self-determination, as promised to them by several Security Council resolutions. Their struggle is a legitimate one for liberation from alien occupation.

International law and the declarations of the United Nations on Self Determination, give the Kashmiri people the right to struggle for their freedom. Every year, the General Assembly unanimously adopts the resolution, which reaffirms "the right of all people's to self determination" and calls on the states concerned to immediately end their occupation and "all acts of repression."

Mr. President,

On behalf of the Kashmiri people; on behalf of the mothers, wives, sisters, and fathers of the innocent Kashmiri children, women and men who have been killed, blinded and injured; on behalf of the Pakistani nation, I demand an independent inquiry into the extra-judicial killings, and a UN fact finding mission to investigate brutalities perpetrated by the Indian occupying forces, so that those guilty of these atrocities are punished.

We demand the immediate release of all Kashmiri political prisoners; an end to the curfew; freedom for the Kashmiris to demonstrate peacefully; urgent medical help for the injured; abrogation of indiaÿs draconian qaws'; and removal of the foreign travel ban on Kashmiri leaders.

Mr. President,

The Security Council has called for the exercise of the right to self- determination by the people of Jammu and Kashmir through a free and fair plebiscite held under UN auspices. The people of Kashmir have waited 70 years for implementation of this promise. The Security Council must honour its commitments by implementing its own decisions. This General Assembly must demand that India deliver on the commitments its leaders solemnly made on many occasions. To this end, steps should be taken by the United Nations to de-militarize Jammu and Kashmir and undertake consultations with India, Pakistan and the true representatives of the Kashmiri people to implement the resolutions of the Security Council. In this context, we welcome the offer of good offices by Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon. We will also open consultations with members of the Security Council to explore the modalities for implementation of the Security Council resolutions on Kashmir.

Mr. President,

The international community ignores the danger of rising tensions in South Asia, at its own peril.

For its part, Pakistan is committed to the establishment of strategic stability in the region. It neither wants, nor is it engaged in an arms race with India. But we cannot ignore our neighbor's unprecedented arms build up and will take whatever measures are necessary to maintain credible deterrence.

We have consistently urged the conclusion of bilateral arms control and disarmament measures between Pakistan and India to prevent conflict and avoid wasteful military expenditures.

We are open to discussing all measures of restraint and responsibility with India, in any forum or format and without any conditions. We are ready for talks to agree on a bilateral nuclear test ban treaty.

Today, from this rostrum, I would also like to reiterate our offer to India to enter into a serious and sustained dialogue for the peaceful resolution of all outstanding disputes, especially Jammu and Kashmir. Mr. President,

As a responsible nuclear weapon state, Pakistan will continue to cooperate with all international efforts that seek to promote fair and equitable solutions to disarmament and non-proliferation challenges. We have introduced 'state of the art' measures to strengthen the safety and security of our nuclear materials and facilities. We have adopted a comprehensive export control regime that is fully consistent with international standards.

Judged on the basis of objective criteria, and without discrimination, Pakistan is fully eligible for membership of the Nuclear Suppliers' Group.

Mr. President,

In our turbulent and interdependent world, the United Nations remains an indispensable Organization to restore order and ensure global peace, stability and prosperity. Its principles remain the crucial pillars of international legality, the guide for the conduct of Member States and the guarantor of the legitimate rights of all nations and peoples.

The UN must regain its credibility as the central instrument for the promotion of peace, prosperity and liberty.

To that end, it should become more representative, transparent and accountable. A comprehensive and democratic reform of the Security Council, which Pakistan supports, should enhance its relevance and representation. Creating new centers of privilege will do the opposite.

Mr. President,

Pakistan's unwavering commitment to the UN is well established. We have played a pioneering and consistent role in UN Peacekeeping. Despite our own security requirements, we will remain one of world's largest troop contributing countries and maintain our record of success in multiple UN peacekeeping operations.

Mr. President,

Pakistan has a vital stake in ending conflicts, fostering peace, fighting terrorism, strengthening democracy, promoting human rights, generating global growth and overcoming the challenges of environmental degradation. We can achieve these goals, and create a new and peaceful world order, only through the United Nations and by strict adherence to the principles of its Charter.

I thank you, Mr. President

https://gadebate.un.org/sites/default/files/gastatements/71/71_PK_en.pdf

Honestly, this speech is one of the worst in terms of head of the state. The current foreign policy of Pakistan is totally controlled by Pakistan military. The language or the process they are following is in line with the military but not the way any country will do its diplomatic missions. This is specialist area and should be left to the specialist, Pakistan do have good diplomats but they are sidelined and left more like a clerk. If the military wants to run the foreign policy, I think they should simply dissolve IFS and appoint clerks. The speech was full of blunders some of which were so novice.

1) Praising a terrorist in UM Assembly.

2) Asking for UN resolution to me implemented when the first part of that needs to be done by Pakistan. So basically he is asking UN to put pressure on Pakistan to start the first step and blaming then on not able to do so in past.

When the military leadership, the diplomats, and PM of Pakistan does not understand these basics no wonder the entire Pakistan does not understand the UN resolution.

As Christina Fair said in one video below. Please go and read the UN resolutions which every Pakistani quotes but nobody has read the darn thing. Please read the darn thing before presenting in public and make a fool of themselves. This totally is applicable to PM of Pakistan. He is at a level maybe at Rahul Gandhi-level or below that we hardly see any head of state in the world. If will not be an overstatement to see he is probably the worst head os state across the globe. I would say the majority of the blame for putting Pakistani PM at this level lies with COAS who make their leader look so bad. They cannot take any major decision, who deals with a PM without any power. His position is only to earn money and get some benefits out of the job.

.

 

[Dem!god]

Lol, big speech my foot, this tunda can't even say a sentence without looking at his notes.
I wish he continue to be Prime minister of pakistan for another two decades.

 

[Joe Shearer]

Take a look at them they are not even look like Makranis which are actually living near coastline of Pakistan and are not actual Balochi tribes men Most of them apparently Indians to me .

Oh good. Now we can get rid of the pent-up work left to be done in anthropology, since we have experts like you who can spot an individual's ethnicity while lying on the floor and rolling around.

What a relief!

No more of those BORING PhD programmes.

 

[rustom]

Looks like sheriffs performance at UNGA will lead to seeking asylum in SA?

 

[Ryuzaki]

When does United Nations general assembly get over?I have the feeling something will happen after that

 

[first77]

go to war

 

[Viper0011.]

It was a good speech but could have been better. Omission of Yadev was disappointing and so was not directly mentioning india's subversive activities in Blochistan.

But on the Kashmir front, Nawaz passes with flying colors. By mentioning Burhan Wani by name he shocked me. Mentioning his freedom struggle and the struggle of the Kashmiri youth against India was also nice to hear. There's no doubt that Kashmir issue has been reinvigorated.

So, overall I'm satisfied with the speech just a little disappointed that Blochistan was put on the back burner.

Everyone in the auditorium appreciated it, including heads of the states and delegates around the world. I don't know how much experience you have at this level, but you don't call out names of countries and their people. Its called a "diplomatic courtesy". So Yadev or anyone else's name wouldn't be called with respect to India. He used the guy from Kashmir in a Kashmiri context as a human rights violation.

Similarly, the Indians won't call people's named. They might use a name of some organization but that is also rare too. There are international protocols you have to follow to address other countries, even if they are your direct enemies.

Baluchistan wasn't put on the back burner. Baluchistan is an active part of Pakistan. Why does he need to mention it when something is already a part of his country? In fact by mentioning him, you'd put Baluchistan as a troubled region, right next to Kashmir. When its brought up again by India....what message you gave to the world? That you accept Baluchistan has issues? Everything is under control in Baluchistan so he did the right thing by not mentioning it at all. All is well there.......so if others bring it up, you act surprise and be like "whaaaat???".

Not gonna lie. His highness cannot deliver a hard hitting speech even if it hit him.

Well, allow me to surprise you, the international community thought this was one of the best and thorough speeches covering a range of issues. Gen. Raheel called up NS and congratulated him as he nailed all points of concern for Pakistan.

In my view, He sould have pre empted coming indian onslaught in sushma swaraj's speech by mentioning indian terrorism in balochistan and karachi...now sushma swaraj will blame, everything from Adam's time, till today on Pak..

What Baluchistan? Wait, its a Pakistani province. Why does India cares so much about an active Pakistani province with the highest growth potential? This is a response to if India brings up Baluchistan. You mention something that's problematic. By NS mentioning Baluchistan, he is technically agreeing to some issues there. While there are none. So why even bring it up?

If India brings it up, they can. I can blame Micky Mouse for my problems. Baluchistan is the Mickey Mouse to blame the Kashmir issue. The entire world has heard about Kashmir for the past 60 years. None have heard about Baluchistan before this year so think about the smartness of not even mentioning the name . Welcome to international politics, where everything has a reason and strategy behind it .

Did you know his green tie had a message too? It reflects the color of Pakistani flag and the union of its provinces. Its a common practice among PM and Presidents to wear colors similar to their flags. It means that the speech has two things, 1: the content and points 2: the leader is absolutely sure about his national integrity and state of the union. If a country has some issues or separation in their geographical regions, they traditionally don't wear the tie representing their state of the unions aka, the flag!