BREAKING: Pakistan dismantles Indian terrorist network which targeted Kashmiri and Sikh activists | 1 foreign operator captured.

[prothought]

What took them so long? after so many people have been killed
by this network? O I forgot they were busy in regime change
op and political interference.

Probably waiting for the big fish to come into the net. Just my guess.

 

[Borderlands]

ISI can send Kashmir back to the 90s if it wants. Do not test our patience.

What you wish is is one thing, what you get is another. In 1990 Kashmir had no military network and police was armed with Lathi. J&K now have informants from 7 different agencies in every villages and police and paramilitary on standby everywhere. There is a reason Kashmiri militants no longer operates in groups larger than 5. They can't sustain logistics, can't arrange hideouts like they did in the 90s. Average life expectancy of militants are less than 1 year, it's not enough to build experienced cadre or leadership.

 

[Jango]

Why not take names?

When will we stop it with this pandering and take names and bring things to the fore?

 

[Mugen]

ISI can send Kashmir back to the 90s if it wants. Do not test our patience.

ISI has sent Pakistan back to the 90s Kashmir-like state.

 

[Bilal9]

You must have taken an over-dose of cow urine and dung. The logo is spelled correct.

A sub-department of any military is called Corps (and not corpse). No surprise here. Temple educated pajeets have similar lower level IQ.

Similarly counter-terrorism (or simply counter terrorism) term is widely used in the whole world.

Why you're exposing your jahalat/ignorance here?

I mean mis-spelling is one thing. But then boasting about it.

Chori chori - aur bhi seenajuri.

 

[The Accountant]

Kulbushan Level operator possibly caught. They should leave him in a Kashmiri mob and let them finish what they started with Abhinandan...

https://twitter.com/x/status/1712754250277872003

I have 0 trust and 0 reliability on any statement from security agencies

 

[indushek]

I can only describe this trolling attempt with one word - dasyu. Reeks of it. Indra would have definitely slain you and taken your AASImaxxed women as concubines.

Half knowledge is the most dangerous of knowledge one can possess

 

[Darth Vader]

They should search GHQ i know few paid agents

 

[arjunk]

What you wish is is one thing, what you get is another. In 1990 Kashmir had no military network and police was armed with Lathi. J&K now have informants from 7 different agencies in every villages and police and paramilitary on standby everywhere. There is a reason Kashmiri militants no longer operates in groups larger than 5. They can't sustain logistics, can't arrange hideouts like they did in the 90s. Average life expectancy of militants are less than 1 year, it's not enough to build experienced cadre or leadership.

Forget the police, PAFF has informants in RR and Indian Army. HM recently posted a video of 7 militants openly gathering in full gear with AKs out.

While the type of warfare has shifted to a more asymmetric type, its intensity can definitely increase.

Remember ISI fought the Soviet war machine head on and emerged victorious.

 

[Borderlands]

Forget the police, PAFF has informants in RR and Indian Army. HM recently posted a video of 7 militants openly gathering in full gear with AKs out.

While the type of warfare has shifted to a more asymmetric type, its intensity can definitely increase.

Remember ISI fought the Soviet war machine head on and emerged victorious.

No Kashmiri militant group have enough manpower, logistics to conduct any sustained actions anywhere in Kashmir. After sustaining heavy losses in Kashmir valley, militants doesn't have much left in Kashmir valley. Militants were getting snitched on by Kashmiris so.much , they appears to have stopped operating in Urban Kashmir. Now they are trying to shift hideout to Forests in Jammu where there are no humans to snitch.


And no, ISI didn't brought Soviet war machine down, unlimited money and weapons from CIA did. Pakistan alone didn't have any capacity to take on any of its neighbours. You failed in Kashmir not due to lack of trying, it's because you failed in battle.

 

[arjunk]

No Kashmiri militant group have enough manpower, logistics to conduct any sustained actions anywhere in Kashmir. After sustaining heavy losses in Kashmir valley, militants doesn't have much left in Kashmir valley. Militants were getting snitched on by Kashmiris so.much , they appears to have stopped operating in Urban Kashmir. Now they are trying to shift hideout to Forests in Jammu where there are no humans to snitch.

Indain surveillance system is just strong in the plains and cities, that is all. TRF and PAFF have carried out minor attacks in Srinagar and Pulwama while JeM blew up 40 Indian soldiers in Pulwama.

And no, ISI didn't brought Soviet war machine down, unlimited money and weapons from CIA did.

Money and weapons are something anyone can arrange for. The expertise of ISI in asymmetric warfare, and ISI's HUMINT network is another story.

Pakistan alone didn't have any capacity to take on any of its neighbours. You failed in Kashmir not due to lack of trying, it's because you failed in battle.

We unilaterally withdrew from Kargil only because of Clinton's pressure, and we stopped supporting JeM and HM because they became US designated terrorist groups.

The US wants to use India as cannon fodder against China like it has used Ukraine against Russia. Hence, it does not want India to feel threatened on other fronts, be it by Pakistan or Canada. This is the sole reason Kashmir has not become a slaughter house for Indian soldiers.

So in short, we have toned down the intensity of the insurgency because of the US, not because of Indian strength.

This has also backfired in a way because the resistance is largely an indigenous effort now.

They are no longer restrained by ISI's ROEs which call for small, regular attacks to not cause an indo-pak standoff. Prime example is JeM doing Pulwama, something Bajwa-Imran khusras would never dream of authorising.

 

[TheSolution]

No Kashmiri militant group have enough manpower, logistics to conduct any sustained actions anywhere in Kashmir. After sustaining heavy losses in Kashmir valley, militants doesn't have much left in Kashmir valley. Militants were getting snitched on by Kashmiris so.much , they appears to have stopped operating in Urban Kashmir. Now they are trying to shift hideout to Forests in Jammu where there are no humans to snitch.


And no, ISI didn't brought Soviet war machine down, unlimited money and weapons from CIA did. Pakistan alone didn't have any capacity to take on any of its neighbours. You failed in Kashmir not due to lack of trying, it's because you failed in battle.

Whatever infrastructure you have currently built up, is because Pakistan allowed it during Musharraf's time.

If Pakistan went back to it's past policies it would be destroyed.

 

[LeGenD]

Good news in a while.

 

[Borderlands]

Indain surveillance system is just strong in the plains and cities, that is all. TRF and PAFF have carried out minor attacks in Srinagar and Pulwama while JeM blew up 40 Indian soldiers in Pulwama.

Money and weapons are something anyone can arrange for. The expertise of ISI in asymmetric warfare, and ISI's HUMINT network is another story.

We unilaterally withdrew from Kargil only because of Clinton's pressure, and we stopped supporting JeM and HM because they became US designated terrorist groups.

The US wants to use India as cannon fodder against China like it has used Ukraine against Russia. Hence, it does not want India to feel threatened on other fronts, be it by Pakistan or Canada. This is the sole reason Kashmir has not become a slaughter house for Indian soldiers.

So in short, we have toned down the intensity of the insurgency because of the US, not because of Indian strength.

This has also backfired in a way because the resistance is largely an indigenous effort now.

They are no longer restrained by ISI's ROEs which call for small, regular attacks to not cause an indo-pak standoff. Prime example is JeM doing Pulwama, something Bajwa-Imran khusras would never dream of authorising.

Kashmir is a small place. Launching one attack every few years isn't a real insurgency capable of achieving any political objectives. ISI utterly failed in it's Kashmir war, they have nothing to show for after 30. India didn't made any compromise on Kashmir. If anything, Indian position is now more hardline and any compromise from India is out of question. Militarily or politically, Pakistan achieved nothing from it.


Meanwhile Indian state is destroying every militant infrastructure and support systems after removing article 370. Banning of Jamat e islami and seizing all their schools and Madrasas alone crippled pro-militant ecosystem beyond repair. Pro militant individuals are all now arrested and shipped to uttarpradesh jails. Separatists who used to propagate militant narratives were all dealt with. Just look at news media like https://www.greaterkashmir.com/ or https://www.risingkashmir.com/ . 10 years ago, they were filled with pro separatist and anti state agenda. Now they are more nationalist than Delhi medias. JKLF gone, it's leader got life in prison. Hurriat Conference gone, it's leader Mirwaiz Umar Farooq got software update. Everyone from hardline Hurriat fraction is in jail. After getting rid of Kashmir autonomy, law and order is now under federal government. Now properties of militants are being seized, something that was not possible before 2019. No more stone peltings, no more mass agitations, because everyone know police under federal government won't give anyone free pass unlike the old state government. Pakistan loses more soldiers in Balochistan and KPK every 3 weeks than India loose in Kashmir a whole year.

datasheet-terrorist-attack-fatalities

And no, Money and weapons are not something Pakistan can arrange. Not when the nation by is bankrupt and in need of loans. And CIA didn't just provide money and weapons, they also provided Intel, training, and enormous media propaganda to support the Jihad.

Again, you never unilaterally withdraw from Kargil. You were unable to stop Indian counter offensive and loosing positions one after the other. Clinton didn't came to Pakistan requesting to withdraw, Pakistani prime minister ran to America uninvited, to bail Pakistan army out. He asked for a cease fire from India so Pakistan army can withdraw without Indian artillery barrage. India refused the offer, and Pakistan Army finally had to retreat under heavy Indian artillery and air attacks, suffering even more casualties. Nawaz himself said how army chief begged him to go to USA for help. Pakistan military got bombed by Indian Airforce all day and PAF refused to even get involved.

 

[nibba]

Indain surveillance system is just strong in the plains and cities, that is all. TRF and PAFF have carried out minor attacks in Srinagar and Pulwama while JeM blew up 40 Indian soldiers in Pulwama.

Money and weapons are something anyone can arrange for. The expertise of ISI in asymmetric warfare, and ISI's HUMINT network is another story.

We unilaterally withdrew from Kargil only because of Clinton's pressure, and we stopped supporting JeM and HM because they became US designated terrorist groups.

The US wants to use India as cannon fodder against China like it has used Ukraine against Russia. Hence, it does not want India to feel threatened on other fronts, be it by Pakistan or Canada. This is the sole reason Kashmir has not become a slaughter house for Indian soldiers.

So in short, we have toned down the intensity of the insurgency because of the US, not because of Indian strength.

This has also backfired in a way because the resistance is largely an indigenous effort now.

They are no longer restrained by ISI's ROEs which call for small, regular attacks to not cause an indo-pak standoff. Prime example is JeM doing Pulwama, something Bajwa-Imran khusras would never dream of authorising.

IM NOT EVEN TRYING BRO

IF I WAS TRYING BRO I WOULDNT BE LOSING