This sensationalist report is a whitewash. We already have positive tests of US citizens blood samples from Dec 13. 2019 to Dec 16. 2019 intentionally or not admitted in a study involving the U.S. CDC published Nov. 30 2020. None of them where reported to be linked to China. The study unsurprisingly remained widely unreported in Western media or just vaguely hushed over, when it was a major revelation and deserved at least the attention this new study gets.
This new study using samples from Jan. 7 2020 doesnt "undo" that earlier study, even if they clearly try to accomplish that. When they say "earlier than believed" they mean the old 2020 timeline they just never changed by not reporting about the found December 2019 cases. US propaganda is trying to mentally assert the first cases several weeks after known cases in the USA, while playing it out as transparency over a few earlier cases, of course conveniently they all allegedly happen to point China again, just like the first time they admitted a case in the USA, projecting U.S. responsibility away again.
The USA initialy reported their first case on Jan. 29, 2020, allegedly found on Jan. 21 and again conveniently it was allegedly someone who allegedly returned recently from Wuhan, China.
Yet we already know since then their first cases were found at least as early as Dec 13. 2019 and Dec 16. 2019
The open question that the USA refuses to properly answer remain the same as before:
1) Instead of any the dozen of known first infections (and possibly thousands unknown cases) of a viral virus, the USA conveniently found someone linked to China to be the first case over a months after its actual first by now known cases. Was this really a coincidence?
2) The USA took over a month to "find" one single out of over dozen proven cases. What were they doing in all that time?
3) The USA took several weeks to "find" one single out of over hundred proven cases. What were they doing in all that time?
4) The USA took over three weeks to "find" one single out of over hundred proven cases after China warned the world about the new Corona variant. What were they doing in all that time?
5) The USA initially based on no sensible logic claimed China could have jumped to conclusions "3 weeks earlier", widely recited in US propaganda, if had just disregarded the scientific procedures and just reported a dangerous pandemic rather than merely an unknown outbreak without solid evidence justifying the panic. How can they blame China as reacting slow for this, after taking more than 6 weeks to find and report their own cases.
6) The USA complained that China took about 2 weeks to verify that the new virus is contagious. They themself didnt verify it until a month since China reported new found virus and atleast about 2 months since they had their own first (known) case in the USA. How can they blame China.
It just adds another question
6) After over a year and a half the USA in wake of reviving old projecting conspiracies suddenly "finds" 5 more Jan 2020 cases that point to China, ignoring 100 cases as early as Dec 2020 that they apparently couldnt link to China. What is the purpose of this sensationalism?
This new study using samples from Jan. 7 2020 doesnt "undo" that earlier study, even if they clearly try to accomplish that. When they say "earlier than believed" they mean the old 2020 timeline they just never changed by not reporting about the found December 2019 cases. US propaganda is trying to mentally assert the first cases several weeks after known cases in the USA, while playing it out as transparency over a few earlier cases, of course conveniently they all allegedly happen to point China again, just like the first time they admitted a case in the USA, projecting U.S. responsibility away again.
The USA initialy reported their first case on Jan. 29, 2020, allegedly found on Jan. 21 and again conveniently it was allegedly someone who allegedly returned recently from Wuhan, China.
Yet we already know since then their first cases were found at least as early as Dec 13. 2019 and Dec 16. 2019
The open question that the USA refuses to properly answer remain the same as before:
1) Instead of any the dozen of known first infections (and possibly thousands unknown cases) of a viral virus, the USA conveniently found someone linked to China to be the first case over a months after its actual first by now known cases. Was this really a coincidence?
2) The USA took over a month to "find" one single out of over dozen proven cases. What were they doing in all that time?
3) The USA took several weeks to "find" one single out of over hundred proven cases. What were they doing in all that time?
4) The USA took over three weeks to "find" one single out of over hundred proven cases after China warned the world about the new Corona variant. What were they doing in all that time?
5) The USA initially based on no sensible logic claimed China could have jumped to conclusions "3 weeks earlier", widely recited in US propaganda, if had just disregarded the scientific procedures and just reported a dangerous pandemic rather than merely an unknown outbreak without solid evidence justifying the panic. How can they blame China as reacting slow for this, after taking more than 6 weeks to find and report their own cases.
6) The USA complained that China took about 2 weeks to verify that the new virus is contagious. They themself didnt verify it until a month since China reported new found virus and atleast about 2 months since they had their own first (known) case in the USA. How can they blame China.
It just adds another question
6) After over a year and a half the USA in wake of reviving old projecting conspiracies suddenly "finds" 5 more Jan 2020 cases that point to China, ignoring 100 cases as early as Dec 2020 that they apparently couldnt link to China. What is the purpose of this sensationalism?
Last edited: