What's new

Breaking news Atleast 50 dead in Punjab (India) as train mows down dusshera revellers

Respect bro....its good to learn.
BTW some hindu philosophers - neo sanyaasis like osho did not have views as common hindus . some time they condemn some acts of ram chander ji too . like a story ram ji punished a choder for hearing vedas with molten lead filled his ears .
 
.
BTW some hindu philosophers - neo sanyaasis like osho did not have views as common hindus . some time they condemn some acts of ram chander ji too . like a story ram ji punished a choder for hearing vedas with molten lead filled his ears .
Ram was a lovely chap bythe sounds of it.
Interetingly i have travelled a lot and one trip to darbar square kathmandu. Did you know they have a living goddess
 
.
Ram was a lovely chap bythe sounds of it.
Interetingly i have travelled a lot and one trip to darbar square kathmandu. Did you know they have a living goddess
Hinduism is very vast religion let me quote gandhi ji (everything can be include in hinduism )
Hinduism have many forms and thoughts Hinduism is not strict or clear religion . people are free to worship different gods and in past thousands of years they have worshiped almost everything available . not bad idea :D
 
.
BTW some hindu philosophers - neo sanyaasis like osho did not have views as common hindus . some time they condemn some acts of ram chander ji too . like a story ram ji punished a choder for hearing vedas with molten lead filled his ears .
Another BS that's not even part of Ramayana .
bhai main bus pardhny ka aadi mujrim hoon :angel:
Then read the correct books .
Valmiki Ramayana or the later version written by Tulsi Das are authetic Ramayana .

If i want to read Quran , i will find one that is authentic , i wont go and read Rangeela Rasol , then crow that Quran say this and that .
 
.
Another BS that's not even part of Ramayana .

Then read the correct books .
Valmiki Ramayana or the later version written by Tulsi Das are authetic Ramayana .

If i want to read Quran , i will find one that is authentic , i wont go and read Rangeela Rasol , then crow that Quran say this and that .


Untitled.png


------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Buddha could not accept Rama as and incarnation of God because Rama killed a sudra, a young man, by pouring hot liquid lead into his ears because he had been listening while hiding behind a tree when a few brahmins were reciting the VEDAS. The sudras were not allowed to read; they were not allowed even to listen! What kind of culture has this country created, where one-fourth of the people are not even allowed to listen to its religious scriptures?

- From ‘Bodhidharma: The Greatest Zen Master’

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
There are many versions of Ramayana. The incident of Rama killing a sudra is not mentioned in Valmiki ramayana but such an incident is mentioned in a medieval Sanskrit text called 'Adhyatma Ramayana
 
.
View attachment 506309

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
There are many versions of Ramayana. The incident of Rama killing a sudra is not mentioned in Valmiki ramayana but such an incident is mentioned in a medieval Sanskrit text called 'Adhyatma Ramayana
Only Valmiki Ramayana or the later day version of it written by Santh Tulsi Das are authentic Ramayana and considered as holy books in Hinduism .
Then there are many versions of Ramayana written over the period of time based on local culture and ethos etc e,g there is a Bali (Indonesian) Ramayana , but they are all literary pieces of that culture and have no religious significance for Hindus .
 
. .
Only Valmiki Ramayana or the later day version of it written by Santh Tulsi Das are authentic Ramayana and considered as holy books in Hinduism .
Then there are many versions of Ramayana written over the period of time based on local culture and ethos etc e,g there is a Bali (Indonesian) Ramayana , but they are all literary pieces of that culture and have no religious significance for Hindus .
thnaks i will consider it too
 
.
Hinduism is very vast religion let me quote gandhi ji (everything can be include in hinduism )
Hinduism have many forms and thoughts Hinduism is not strict or clear religion . people are free to worship different gods and in past thousands of years they have worshiped almost everything available . not bad idea :D
And hence the total confusion.
I have personally visited temples in nepal where the worship the male penis and female vagina. I was rather shocked to see 6ft plus penis with women rubbing againstthem for fertitily. So i agree they worship just about anything but indont think its a good idea
 
.
Hinduism is very vast religion let me quote gandhi ji (everything can be include in hinduism )
Hinduism have many forms and thoughts Hinduism is not strict or clear religion . people are free to worship different gods and in past thousands of years they have worshiped almost everything available . not bad idea :D
yeah because its not a religion its paganism, in which you can create your own god(s).
 
.
And hence the total confusion.
I have personally visited temples in nepal where the worship the male penis and female vagina. I was rather shocked to see 6ft plus penis with women rubbing againstthem for fertitily. So i agree they worship just about anything but indont think its a good idea
All religions are weird..I too find weird people defending some religious figure who married a 6 year old and had sex with her when she was only 9 .
I know a reliious group which tries to defend their leader who married his daughter in law by forcing his son to divorce her...I can go on and on.
Religion is a strange thing man..it kills rationality...we are rationalists as long as weird practices or superstitions of other religions are concerned..but when it comes to our religion ,we find silly excuses to continue practising and believing all that os irrational in it.
 
.
Only Valmiki Ramayana or the later day version of it written by Santh Tulsi Das are authentic Ramayana and considered as holy books in Hinduism .
Then there are many versions of Ramayana written over the period of time based on local culture and ethos etc e,g there is a Bali (Indonesian) Ramayana , but they are all literary pieces of that culture and have no religious significance for Hindus .

rama killing the sudra (Shambuka vadha) is mentioned in Padma Purana , do you consider Padma purana an authentic holy book ?
 
.
BTW i read ramayan and i think RAVAN was good man and ram was cheater .
on occasion of sita's swambher they lied to ravan that lanka is burning ravan went to lanka immediately and find out it was lie there was no fire when he come back swambher was over and sita was wife of ram . so its logically make rawan angry . even when he abduct sita he did not harm sita . it was ram whom ask sita for agni pariksha and banwaas of years . so logically people should burn ram not rawan .

It was not Prabhu Sri Ram Ji who told about fire in Lanka...

He "Ravana" did not harmed mata Sita because of a curse according to which he will die as soon as he will try to force himself on any women without her will... please read "RAMBHA & RAVANA"...

Please refrain from hurting religious feelings... Specially when you don't have ANY KNOWLEDGE...

Ravana was a highly knowledgeable BRHAMIN... one of the great SHIV BHAKT... powerful enough to up root mount Kailash, residence of Lord SHIVA... Conqueror of all GRAH and YAM (Lord of death)... BUT HIS BIGGEST SIN was to abduct someone's wife... REASON for his downfall...

His sins were bigger than his good deeds...

How would you feel when I tell you how MUSLIM religion allow killing of people believing other religion... a religion whose story is soaked in blood and spread under the shadow of sword... with proof... from killing of Hussain to...

To all MODS if someone report this message... I request to take similar ACTION on IMRAN Bhai too...

BTW some hindu philosophers - neo sanyaasis like osho did not have views as common hindus . some time they condemn some acts of ram chander ji too . like a story ram ji punished a choder for hearing vedas with molten lead filled his ears .

What to say... I can write anything on internet...

Prabhu Sri Ram is the one who ate "plum" aka "bair" which were tasted by mata Shabri...

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shabari?wprov=sfla1
 
.
It was not Prabhu Sri Ram Ji who told about fire in Lanka...

He "Ravana" did not harmed mata Sita because of a curse according to which he will die as soon as he will try to force himself on any women without her will... please read "RAMBHA & RAVANA"...

Please refrain from hurting religious feelings... Specially when you don't have ANY KNOWLEDGE...

Ravana was a highly knowledgeable BRHAMIN... one of the great SHIV BHAKT... powerful enough to up root mount Kailash, residence of Lord SHIVA... Conqueror of all GRAH and YAM (Lord of death)... BUT HIS BIGGEST SIN was to abduct someone's wife... REASON for his downfall...

His sins were bigger than his good deeds...

How would you feel when I tell you how MUSLIM religion allow killing of people believing other religion... a religion whose story is soaked in blood and spread under the shadow of sword... with proof... from killing of Hussain to...

To all MODS if someone report this message... I request to take similar ACTION on IMRAN Bhai too...



What to say... I can write anything on internet...

Prabhu Sri Ram is the one who ate "plum" aka "bair" which were tasted by mata Shabri...
man i did.not fabricate it i just got it .and sorry.if its hurt your feelings we were just discussing.
 
.
man i did.not fabricate it i just got it .and sorry.if its hurt your feelings we were just discussing.

I will also not fabricate how GURU TEG BAHADUR was killed by MUSLIMS...

He went their to stop FORCEFULL conversion of Hindus in Kashmir and other parts of India... he went their to stop Aurangzeb from killing those who were not leaving their faith...

@Oscar what do you need to end this DISCUSSION where bigots are talking about MY religion... without any knowledge of the same...

@Imran Khan Hindu is not a religion... it is a classification which got popular under long history of SLAVERY...
religion is SATYA SANATAN VEDIC DHARMA...
I request you to refrain from discussing religion on DEFENCE forum... we will end up hurting each other's RELIGIOUS BELIEFS...
 
.
Back
Top Bottom