Being "head of the government of a sovereign nation state" does not essentially preclude criminality and wrongdoing.
And neither should it invite unwarranted and biased criticism especially from those quarters having no stakes in our polity.
That is another thing, that they were and are above law, whatever little there was or is.
Rule of law still reigns supreme in India, the defendant you speak of had to go through the due process of the law just like any other citizen of India.
You appear to be under some misconception that politics is governed by some kind of morality or ethics.
I believe that a politician is the manifestation of the ideals that maketh him, a train of thought culminating into him reaching his objective. International relations, on the other hand, is an admixture of interdisciplinary ideologies, rights, cultures and most important of them all interests and self preservation.
that is of course problem of Pakistan and Pakistan will have to address it, if it so desires.
Which brings us to our current topic of discussion, that Pakistan like any other country will do anything within its capacity to stay afloat.
Generally, scales tip to the mightier side.
I can not speak for you, but in my experience that has been exception rather than the norm.
Not at all. I think that many fundamental political and social disputes get resolved, not owing to the willingness of the combating parties, but by the forces of circumstances, which are beyond anybody's control, or even imagination. Let's await for them.
The problem with that line of thought is the unpredictability associated, which you rightly say can spiral out of control.
Cosmetic changes can bring about much needed relief to the din, conflicts can't go on forever, for once they reach the crescendo people need time to gather their wits together.