I just watched his live interview it was on Pakistani News Channels
It seems their is a growing concern that Britain had intentionally left this Kashmir crisis dangling during partition.
My own person view is Britain was pretty fair it gave the power in hand of "people"
The Queen of England made a promise (if Subcontinent helped England in WWII they would be set free) and she kept it , it was only the dirty indians who ruined a perfect independence moment for Pakistan
However Indian Military started to confiscate regions where people did not wanted to be ruled by Hindu and thus it created the Kashmir issue
Facts:
Indian Military helped confiscate various regions in India , some did not wanted to be part of india , enjoying weapons and man power the military was used to take land and provinces by force. When Hyderabad/Junagadh fell , it was the last straw for Pakistan when Hindu went after Kashmir
Hyderabad
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Indian_annexation_of_Hyderabad
Junagadh
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Annexation_of_Junagadh
After the two violations ....
1947 India (
Dominion of India not the present day India) -Pakistan First War
DOMINION of India hmmmm 3 years it operated ......all it did was stole land and used Indian miitary for that purpose .....
By year 1950 , the "Dominion of India" transferred control over to what we know know as India (Hindustan)
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dominion_of_India
Between 1947 -1950 this guy was the head of operation for India confiscating land for Dominion of India
George VI (Albert Frederick Arthur George; 14 December 1895 – 6 February 1952) was King of the United Kingdom and the Dominions of the British Commonwealth from 11 December 1936 until his death on 6 February 1952.
He was still King of India till 1950 he died himself 1952 don't think he knew what hindus were doing out in india
The situation is bit odd because for 3 years ..their was no indian constitution they were running the show on British Constitution
So here is the funny part which I am just thinking about if they had 3 years to help grow this Domain of India , they could have taken their time to do voting in Kashmir ? !
I am utterly confused .... how can Britain be in charge but let Hindus run the show in India
You see......... this 15th August , Independence was balooni
India has a second celebration day which it calls the
Republic Day , that is the day when India was fully 100% out of control of British
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Republic_Day_(India)
So why people stated ....british were short on time ??
- Why was every thing rushed ?
- Why was Kashmir left as is ?
- Why was no support given to Hyderabad?
- Why was no support given to Juna garh?
Clearly between
1947-1950 their were 3 years to sort all regional issues on table