What's new

Brazil once a poor country like Pakistan, now top meat and egg exporter: Imran Khan is not wrong!

Norwegian

BANNED
Joined
Aug 19, 2014
Messages
19,001
Reaction score
11
Country
Israel
Location
Norway
The Rise of Big Meat: Brazil’s Extractive Industry

shutterstock_16297150_CMYK_150.jpg

Introduction: Brazil’s Rise to the Top of the Global Meat Complex
Brazil is the world’s leading exporter of soybeans; the second largest exporter of maize; and the world’s largest beef trader, exporting more than 20 percent of the world’s beef (Figures 1 and 2). It has overtaken the United States to become the biggest exporter of poultry in the world, close to 39 percent of total global exports. With China drastically increasing its pork imports in the last two years, Brazil has also stepped in to meet this demand. The massive expansion in production has had dramatic impacts on Brazilians linked to the supply chain and on Brazil’s prized environment, and has additionally made Brazil increasingly dependent on these commodities to maintain a trade surplus.

Figure-01%404x-100.jpg
Figure-02%404x-100.jpg
Figure-03%404x-100_0.jpg


Becoming a leader of the global meat complex has come with a stark increase in the concentration of power to a handful of transnational corporations (TNCs) at every step of the Brazilian meat production chain. This has been achieved in a short span of time—since the turn of this century—and consolidated in just the last ten years.

As Figure 3 illustrates, six of the nine largest exporting companies in 2014 were grain traders and meat packers. The other three, Vale, Petrobras and Embraer, are mining, oil and aeronautical industry giants, respectively. The rise of the meat industry has come with the help of the Brazilian government.

Brazil’s “National Champions” and the role of the Brazilian National Development Bank
From 2007 to 2013, the Brazilian National Development Bank (Banco Nacional de Desenvolvimento Econômico e Social[BNDES]) implemented the so-called National Champions policy. The idea was to select Brazilian exporting companies and transform them into large transnational corporations that bring home large revenues. The beneficiaries, which included some of the largest Brazilian meatpacking corporations as well as oil and mining corporations, absorbed two-thirds of the allocated BNDES resources. These “champions” included JBS-Friboi (known globally as JBS), Marfrig and Brasil Foods (BRF). These companies received large volumes of resources, not only through subsidized loans, but also through the purchasing of debentures and company shares through BNDES’s investment arm, BNDES Participações (BNDESPar). For instance, BNDESPar owns close to 25 percent of JBS’s capital while the Brazilian public bank Caixa Econômica Federal owns 10 percent.

Frequent mergers and acquisitions and consolidation across several meat segments (beef, pork, poultry, etc.) and other parts of the value chain (feed, additives) are key to the meat industry’s strategy in increasing profits. In this way, the companies used a large portion of BNDES resources to swallow up small businesses. They continued to rapidly amass power through further mergers and acquisition activities in key meat producing and consuming countries.

Figure-04%404x-100.jpg


Brazil’s trade policy already contributes to a path of dependency on exporting land-based, natural resource intensive commodities and importing much more expensive, value-added products with a high technology content. BNDES’ use of public resources to exacerbate this trend makes little sense to many Brazilian civil society organizations (CSOs). While the National Champions policy has delivered massive profits to chief executives and shareholders of major corporations, many feel that taxpayers have gained little from large sums of public money being diverted to these large conglomerates.4 Instead, their dramatic increase in economic and political might has enabled them to operate above the law. For instance, last year, JBS chairman Joseley Batista was charged with corruption by Brazil’s independent public prosecutor in connection to JBS’ holding company, J&F Investimentos SA. In February of this year, federal prosecutors mandated that Batista’s assets be frozen in connection to fraud related to J&F’s involvement with state owned pension funds.5 Things continued to get worse in the course of the year (see Tainted meat and reputations).

JBS
JBS’ value jumped from USD 1 billion in 2004 to USD 34 billion in 2014, as it expanded from beef to poultry and other products.6 JBS now boasts of owning 340 operations that produce products ranging from meat and leather to biodiesel and metal packaging and cleaning.7 It is the world’s largest exporter of meat, selling to over 150 countries. In the U.S., it is the leading processor of beef, pork and lamb and the second largest poultry producer; it is also the leading beef producer in Canada and the largest cattle-feeder in the world.8 It additionally has operations in Argentina, Australia, Mexico, Paraguay and Uruguay.

JBS, in particular, has mastered the art of growth through mergers and acquisitions. In 2013, JBS acquired Seara, the second largest chicken and pork processing company in Brazil. Previously, Marfrig had bought it from Cargill in 2009. In 2015, JBS bought Cargill’s largest pork facility in the U.S., and in Europe, it acquired Moy Park, one of the largest European poultry and processed food facilities that belonged to Marfrig.9 In Brazil, it also acquired the French subsidiary Frangosul (owned by Doux) and the U.S. subsidiary Tyson Brazil (from Tyson Foods).10 JBS’ expansion into other exporting countries has allowed the company to avoid food safety restrictions imposed on Brazilian exports—also known as “non-tariff barriers” or sanitary and phyto-sanitary (SPS) restrictions. Frequent outbreaks of Foot and Mouth Disease and other zoonotic diseases in Brazil continue to impose barriers on Brazilian exports. As JBS’s foreign investments have grown, such as in the U.S. and Australia, it has allowed the company 50 percent of the world market that would have otherwise remained closed had it remained only in Brazil.

BRF
Corporate concentration in the Brazilian poultry processing sector increased significantly when BNDES financed the merger of two Brazilian giants in the meat processing and frozen foods sector, Sadia and Perdigão, in 2009. Pension funds of two large state enterprises—Petrobras Social Security Foundation (12.49 percent) and the Banco do Brasil Employees’ Pension Fund (10.94 percent)—are BRF’s largest shareholders.

The company is now the largest international exporter of chicken (20 percent of global exports and nine percent of global trade in animal protein) and the seventh largest food corporation in the world, according to its annual report.16Unlike JBS, BRF’s key strategy entails the acquisition of small companies in emerging economies that have significant potential for increasing meat consumption.

BRF owns Plusfood in Europe—a poultry processor with plants in England and the Netherlands that sells to major supermarkets in Europe.17 In 2014, the company expanded its processing plants in Argentina, which now produce poultry, margarine, cheese and beef.18

Its recent acquisitions in the Middle East and Turkey have also allowed it to become a major processor of halal meat for Islamic markets. In January, BRF consolidated its production of halal meat destined for Islamic countries under a new subsidiary in Dubai called OneFoods. This includes transferring the assets of eight slaughterhouses in Brazil that must export using halal production standards along with grain storage facilities, chicken hatcheries and feedmills.19 One of the first actions of this new subsidiary was to acquire a 60 percent stake in Banvit, Turkey’s largest poultry processing company. The Qatar Investment Authority (a Qatari Sovereign Wealth Fund) will own the remaining 40 percent.20

Marfrig
Marfrig states that it is the second largest beef operator in Brazil, the largest beef processing company in Uruguay, and the largest importer of meat in Chile. With a physical presence in 12 countries and its processed products in over a 100, the company boasts of processing up to 3.8 million head of cattle and 2.3 million head of sheep a year.21 Through its ownership of Keystone—one of the largest international suppliers of industrialized foods to large restaurant and retail chains such as McDonald’s, Subway and Wendy’s—it also processes 250 million birds and manufactures 580 thousand tons of food every year.22

Conclusion
The Brazilian government’s initiative to create National Champions has undoubtedly helped JBS, BRF and other corporations rise to the top of the global meat complex. It is also clear that this support has led to enormous profits for the CEOs and shareholders of these companies. From an economic development perspective, there is no compelling evidence that the capital used to acquire meat processing companies abroad and the resulting profits has benefited Brazilian citizens. Moreover, as we shall see in the following sections, the rest of the Brazilian population—as well as others around the globe—have been forced to bear the social and environmental costs of their rise
https://www.iatp.org/the-rise-of-big-meat

If Brazilian government can achieve all that in a few years with state sponsored capitalism, why not Pakistan? What's wrong with this nation laughing at its future?
@BHarwana @Horus @war&peace @Zibago @koolio @Canuck786 @Tameem @Proudpakistaniguy @Mugen @MBT 3000 @third eye @GHALIB
 
If Brazilian government can achieve all that in a few years with state sponsored capitalism, why not Pakistan? What's wrong with this nation laughing at its future?

Go ahead and do it . Who is stopping?

Bur seriously we have people here who consider this obligatory to defend and justify everything Imran say or do even if it make no sense

so then you should not mind when people post economic policy of PTI like this

 
Brazil is physically a very large country (arable land, pastoral land and water resources per capita) though. Like there are lessons that can be learned for sure, but it is not 1:1 compatibility with Pakistan.

Just need to go to Mato Grosso and rest of Brazilian agricultural heartland to see what I mean....it is very much frontier driven still rather than intensity driven (though that is happening with time too).

Pakistan should focus on what takes fewest inputs (that are well priced according to scarcity - so basically everything with possible exception of labour) and maximum profit return and focus on those first....i.e intensity driven.
 
Bur seriously we have people here who consider this obligatory to defend and justify everything Imran say or do even if it make no sense

so then you should not mind when people post economic policy of PTI like this
Potians were still listening to IK speech when Patwaris started their anti IK campaign on eggs and cattle. How can we help them when they are uneducated, low IQ breed? If PAKISTANs economy could be jump-started by Aladins magical lamp, former governments would have done it long time ago. Right now country's vital resource is its cattle and livestock, that with government aid could be a huge export contributer. Instead of praising the initiative, Patwaris started usual anti IK campaign.
 
Potians were still listening to IK speech when Patwaris started their anti IK campaign on eggs and cattle. How can we help them when they are uneducated, low IQ breed? If PAKISTANs economy could be jump-started by Aladins magical lamp, former governments would have done it long time ago. Right now country's vital resource is its cattle and livestock, that with government aid could be a huge export contributer. Instead of praising the initiative, Patwaris started usual anti IK campaign.
You really need a genius to tell you this Eggonomics formula to boost the economy :D Its not about patwari because if you watch the videos then even people in the hall was laughing when Imran disclosed this secret success formula but as I said if you think this will work and will make Pakistan like Brasil then go ahead , ignore critics and make it success story to shut the mouth of critics
 
You really need a genius to tell you this Eggonomics formula to boost the economy :D Its not about patwari because if you watch the videos then even people in the hall was laughing when Imran disclosed this secret success formula but as I said if you think this will work and will make Pakistan like Brasil then go ahead , ignore critics and make it success story to shut the mouth of critics
It's not just Brazil. China, US, India are also exporting eggs and cattle worth billions of dollars each year. When IK outlined to do the same, entire nation laughs.
Problem was never with the leadership. It always with the brainless, low IQ, hadharam people waiting for Aladins magical lamp.
 
Potians were still listening to IK speech when Patwaris started their anti IK campaign on eggs and cattle. How can we help them when they are uneducated, low IQ breed? If PAKISTANs economy could be jump-started by Aladins magical lamp, former governments would have done it long time ago. Right now country's vital resource is its cattle and livestock, that with government aid could be a huge export contributer. Instead of praising the initiative, Patwaris started usual anti IK campaign.

Mate what more do you expect from dumb Godfather minions, they are already making fun of IK with chickens, what they fail to realise there is so much potential to boost the economy when you have China next door with huge opportunities for Pakistani Cattle exporters.

As I have said before all these initiatives by GOP look good, the real cancer in Pakistan is corruption, until corruption is not minimised or completely eradicated, Pakistan will not progress.
 
Last edited:
The Proof of Argo-Development is all around us. Pakistan should seek investment for modern farming ventures while allowing farmers to still own their own land. For Example; each district can partner with a different company for 5 years and participating farmers lease out their land.
 
The Proof of Argo-Development is all around us. Pakistan should seek investment for modern farming ventures while allowing farmers to still own their own land. For Example; each district can partner with a different company for 5 years and participating farmers lease out their land.
Completely agree. Public-private-corporate partnership is the way to the future.
 
Completely agree. Public-private-corporate partnership is the way to the future.

Also the Farmer will care for his land because after the 5 years the company will be done, but the farmer has to make sure the land is still fertile. The farmer and his family will also be workers on the land, and this increases his or her and their family's incentive to work as hard as possible and learn as much as possible to get the most yield.

Also a fair Islamic deal on repaying a company's investment has to be made to protect the farmer (failure to pay back loans are literally killing farmers in India), so the investing company has to share in the reward as well as the risk. The can't expect a fix amount because that can vary from year to year, so a fixed percentage would be fair to both parties, above a minimum yield set aside to sustain the farmer in the event of a really bad year.

Taxes collected on the earnings of both the farmer and the company, would go into a direct fund that would pay for maintaining and improving the irrigation system; New Dams, removing sediment from canals, and schools to train farmers on best practices.

With a fair and equitable plan, Farmers would have nothing to lose and would jump at the chance to partner with the best companies. This would create a market place for every better and better modern techniques to maximize yield without depleting the soil and water reserves.

P.S. the government will have to strictly enforce water distribution if this is to work because powerful people will use old techniques and hoard the water.
 
It's not just Brazil. China, US, India are also exporting eggs and cattle worth billions of dollars each year. When IK outlined to do the same, entire nation laughs.
Problem was never with the leadership. It always with the brainless, low IQ, hadharam people waiting for Aladins magical lamp.
Again if you could uplift poor class and could improve economy just by developing the poultry industry then go ahead and first implement it and make it success story which will be big slap on faces of critics but just making Pakistan as brasil on paper would not work. I think even illiterate villager could give you this idea about having cattle and chicken for business and income but it was not suitable for prime minister to talk about this when he is addressing national and international audience and telling about his achievement in first 100 days
 
Also the Farmer will care for his land because after the 5 years the company will be done, but the farmer has to make sure the land is still fertile. The farmer and his family will also be workers on the land, and this increases his or her and their family's incentive to work as hard as possible and learn as much as possible to get the most yield.

Also a fair Islamic deal on repaying a company's investment has to be made to protect the farmer (failure to pay back loans are literally killing farmers in India), so the investing company has to share in the reward as well as the risk. The can't expect a fix amount because that can vary from year to year, so a fixed percentage would be fair to both parties, above a minimum yield set aside to sustain the farmer in the event of a really bad year.

Taxes collected on the earnings of both the farmer and the company, would go into a direct fund that would pay for maintaining and improving the irrigation system; New Dams, removing sediment from canals, and schools to train farmers on best practices.

With a fair and equitable plan, Farmers would have nothing to lose and would jump at the chance to partner with the best companies. This would create a market place for every better and better modern techniques to maximize yield without depleting the soil and water reserves.

P.S. the government will have to strictly enforce water distribution if this is to work because powerful people will use old techniques and hoard the water.
I agree. Pti government can start some pilot projects and check if they generate long term revenue. Use the experience learned to do full national level reform.
 
Due to huge population export of such product is difficult to achieve as domestic consumption is high this work in countries with low domestic consumption in Pakistan every poor family already has desi chickens and hens in their home so this is not new initiative by ik higher class families living in good areas not usually keep hens at home but buy from market
 
Again if you could uplift poor class and could improve economy just by developing the poultry industry then go ahead and first implement it and make it success story which will be big slap on faces of critics but just making Pakistan as brasil on paper would not work. I think even illiterate villager could give you this idea about having cattle and chicken for business and income but it was not suitable for prime minister to talk about this when he is addressing national and international audience and telling about his achievement in first 100 days
Every time I shed away my belief that you are educated person and not a brainless patwari, some how you always manage to shatter that though. Why not suitable? Pakistan is 8th largest cattle holder of the world. It's untapped resource, that with government aid could jump start it's dwindling exports. This is the matter of crucial seriousness which patwaris like you tone down with pathetic comments like "he is PM, he should not talk about eggs and cattle in front of nation ". I mean why not? How else he is going to take brainless nation into confidence?
 

Country Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom