What's new

Boycott of Chinese goods: China warns of impact on India-bound investments

Indian members on this thread
@[Bregs]
@Echo_419
@O.P.D
@Ryuzaki
@SrNair
@Abba_Dabba_Jabba
@ito
@Nair saab
@Tom M
@Crixus
@Mercury
@Great Sachin
@lightoftruth
@jha
@Indika
@Hulk
@Soulspeek
@cloud_9
@aman_rai
@Bombermanx1
@Hindustani78
@R&D
@Indiran Chandiran

I had previously debunked these delusions of Chinese of Indian dependence on Chinese imports, but doing so again

Starters here is pic of Indian imports from China in 2015

oqeyyx.jpg


Interesting observations:
Chinese imports form a mere approx 16% share in our imports

Chinese products forming major share in Indian imports are:

Umbrellas, sun umbrellas, walking sticks, seat-sticks, whips, riding-crops and parts thereof
Silk
Prepared feathers and down and articles made of feathers or of down; artificial flowers; articles
Toys, games and sports requisites; parts and accessories thereof
Articles of leather; saddlery and harness; travel goods, handbags and similar containers; articles
Knitted or crocheted fabrics
Musical instruments; parts and accessories of such articles
Manufactures of straw, of esparto or of other plaiting materials; basketware and wickerwork
Ceramic products
Headgear and parts thereof
Impregnated, coated, covered or laminated textile fabrics; textile articles of a kind suitable
Footwear, gaiters and the like; parts of such articles
Furniture; bedding, mattresses, mattress supports, cushions and similar stuffed furnishings;
Other base metals; cermets; articles thereof
Electrical machinery and equipment and parts thereof; sound recorders and reproducers, television . .
Other vegetable textile fibres; paper yarn and woven fabrics of paper yarn

In Chinese opinion without these above critical imports (umbrellas :lol:) life in India will come to standstill

Among these lets concentrate on electronics which form approx 54% in all electronic imports i.e at $19 billion

First India's entire electronic product consumption for a same year is $75 billion

http://www.gadgetsnow.com/tech-news...16-ASSOCHAM-EY-study/articleshow/51811218.cms

And entire electronics import for the same year is $36 billion

2mhh2li.jpg


Hence 75-36 = $39 billion worth electronics is produced locally.

Of imported $36 billion the Chinese share is $19 billion, Hence in the entire $75 billion Indian market Chinese share is approx 25%.

I guess with such major share in our electronics Industry Chinese can achieve an economic blockade against us :cry:

Another popular Chinese delusion, all electronics are made in China and without importing it the world would go back to living in caves

First Chinese electronics exports to world are 25.8% of global import demand. Though a big achievement however even here there is no majority share.

2w4kz79.jpg


next just as noted in case of Indian import share of Chinese electronics, the overall share of Chinese products in global electronics industry would be much lower 25.8%

Given the intellectual sensitivities of some Chinese members here on pdf, I would urge Indian members to pretend all the above is false, so that we do not hurt their beliefs. ;)

http://trademap.org/Product_SelProductCountry.aspx
Thanks man. Informative. How do I keep a copy for easy reference.
 
If there are attacks in India where Masood Azhar is involved or you veto again his decleration as terrorist .... then the results will be more shiny
Too early to tell ,let's see the result in a year.
 
This is indeed a sad story that would make a patriotic Indian like yourself to burst into tears. But it is not like there is no alternative. You can make "tri-color" flags in India, and now you can make firecrackers in India too. The only thing you need to do is to convince Indian masses to pay 30-40% premium for Made In India tag. Judging from PDF Indian members' patriotism, it should not be a mission impossible.
Yes I am indeed in tears picturing the frightening aspect of the entire human civilization left at mercy of Chinese exports.

































Tears of derisive laughter that is :D
 
Last edited:
Stop supporting terrorists and every one will be happy
let Indian consumers talk, let's see what will happen in one year time. we'll find by then whether Indian consumers really stop buying Chinese goods or only those Indian internet warriors claim they do.

Since many Indians here are screaming that they can live without Chinese products, then please honestly do.
 
Yes I am indeed in tears picturing the frightening aspect of the entire human civilization left at mercy of Chinese exports.
:D

Infact the chinese exports have made the economic crisis worldwide and made the economies of many countries to go down.

Chinese exports are mainly eletronic items, toys and other domestic items , the chinese food exports are going to only those countries with whom the Chinese are having military alliance such as Russian Federation, North Korea etc.
 
Why chose to elaborate only electronics
Why choose to avoid discusing pharmaceutical APIs or any other imports?
Learn how to read and interpret data :lol:

The listing of Chinese import image shows imports forming a majority i.e >50%

Pharmaceuticals or APIs were not mentioned in that listing.

Electronics was chosen to be expanded due to constant Chinese delusion of Indian heavy dependence on electronic products such as cellphones.


Over-dependence of Indian pharmaceutical industry on imported pharma raw materials from China to meet the growing requirements of drug formulations is a cause of concern for the industry as well as policymakers.

India may have emerged as a key supplier of generic and affordable medicine for the world market, its overwhelming dependence on China for crucial raw materials, such as active pharmaceutical ingredients (APIs) and intermediates, to the extent of over 65 per cent of the requirement, has emerged as a main worrying area, according to an Assocham-RNCOS joint paper.

This is all the more disconcerting in the face of louder narrative against reducing trade gap with China which is well over $ 51 billion, added the study.


APIs and intermediates are key raw materials to manufacture pharmaceutical formulations such as tablets, capsules, syrups, etc. Rapid growth in new medical technologies is spurring the demand for generic drugs worldwide with the increased import of raw pharma ingredients from the emerging markets. Against this background, the policy makers have also raised concerns over India’s rising dependence on imports from China for many APIs that go into the making of a number of essential drugs.

Though the government has taken steps like withdrawal of exemption in customs duties, imports worth Rs 13,853 crore in 2015-16 or 65.29 per cent of the total imports of Rs 21,216 crore are not sustainable. “Over-dependence on China for APIs is likely to affect the bulk drug manufacturing sector, and subsequently have an impact on our population in plausible scenarios of drug shortages brought down by interrupted imports from single source country,” said D S Rawat, secretary general, Assocham, adding that over-dependence on such a crucial raw material on a single country is also not advisable from India’s overall strategic interests as well.

One of the main reasons for huge API imports from China is low cost of its manufacture and subsidy in China while India levies negligible import fee. “The import fees should be increased in line with other counterparts,” advocated the Assocham-RNCOS paper.

Presence of multiple regulatory authorities for the industry is also hampering the growth of the sector. The API manufacturers have to approach different authorities for renewal of licences that become a tedious affair. “Therefore, a single committee of various government departments should be formed to regulate the industry through a single window and audit of plants,” said Assocham.

Besides, the centre can focus on development of mega parks for APIs across the country. These parks should be provided with common facilities such as effluent treatment plants, testing, power plants, IPR management and designing. These facilities should be maintained by special purpose vehicles.

Several other countries like China provide incentives and subsidies for promoting the manufacture of essential pharmaceutical raw material. This significantly reduces their cost of production and ability to supply API to the world market at a huge discount to the global prices. This discourages new domestic investment in the sector.


As in the case of almost every other sector except commodities(e.g spices), the API industry relies heavily on Chinese imports. Without them, Indian pharmaceutical industry will come crumbling down, Indian patients will die and live will indeed 'come to a standstill'.

Looks like the Chinese control even the fate of Indian lives:

Now that you have mentioned APIs, here is some data

India has its own developed API industry

indian-apis-active-pharmaceuticals-ingredients-analysis-3-638.jpg


http://www.slideshare.net/sunilzon/indian-ap-is-analysis

And in Asia it is second to China in API companies:

TR-Figure%201%20Asian%20API%20Production%20Companies%20by%20Country.jpg


http://connect.dcat.org/blogs/value...utical-and-api-positions-in-asia#.WBd9ldUrKM8

In the event of Chinese embargo on APIs to India, India will merely switch importing from other nations until domestic manufacturing can match the demand. Unless you can cook up CCP stats showing China is the only API supplier on the planet.:D

Besides while frothing and salivating at pictures of Indians requiring medical assistance.
Perhaps you should be paying attention to Chinese cancer patients risking jail in order to obtain cheaper medicines from India.
Your Govt insecurity of Indian pharmaceuticals obtaining a market share in China is costing Chinese lives.

But i guess in yours and CCP Govt and it devotee perverted minds these mainland Chinese citizens do not deserve to live for daring to obtain medicines from India and make great celestial Zhongguo look bad:tdown:

Lucky that your ancestors migrated to Singapore to escape these harsh realities.



When patients get caught between cancer and crime - China - Chinadaily.com.cn

After businessman Lu Yong was charged with "the sale of fake drugs" and "impairing credit card administration", the case once again set off debates over unlicensed overseas anti-tumor medicines.

In contrast with patented drugs sold for higher prices, partially resulting from huge R&D expenditure by initial developers, the compulsory license practice enabled an Indian generic version to be more affordable. In China, there is also such a stipulation in patent law, which has never been resorted to.

The 46-year-old owner of a textile export company in Wuxi, Jiangsu province, Lu helped buy Indian medicines, which are unlicensed in China, via credit cards that turned out to be illegal.

Under the current legal system, drugs that have not been given the green light by related authorities are considered fake, even if they are effective, prosecutor Luo Jian, who is dealing with the case, told Beijing Times.

People who provide accounts for the sale of fake drugs will be treated as accomplices, according to the law, Luo said.

Lu himself was diagnosed with chronic myeloid leukemia in 2002 and began to take Gleevec, developed by Swiss pharmaceutical giant Novartis for use in the treatment of multiple cancers.

The anti-tumor drug recommended by his doctor was priced around 23,500 yuan ($3,777) per box at that time and he needed to take one box a month.

As the medicine is not covered by the national medical insurance system, he told Chinese Business View that he spent 600,000 to 700,000 yuan on his treatment in the first two years after his diagnosis and was almost broke.

In 2004, Lu began to turn to Gleevec's Indian version, Veenat, which had a similar effect yet cost much less, 3,000 yuan, if bought directly from India. He shared his find with other leukemia patients in support groups at social network platform QQ. As a result, more than 1,000 members of the groups followed suit.

Complicated procedures that involve filing various documents in English for the shipments remained a "torture" for many of these new buyers. So Lu served as an interpreter for them, free of charge.

The price of Veenat continued to fall over the years, because of growing group purchases. The cost, including mail charges, had dropped to around 200 yuan by September 2013, Lu said.

To tap into the huge underground market, the Indian company opened bank accounts in China to facilitate remittance yet faced frequent problems due to restrictions and technical issues in transnational payments.

The company asked Lu, one of their earliest Chinese buyers, to use his own account as a bridge, he told media.

They had previously used accounts belonging to two patients in Yunnan province, through which Lu and others suffering from leukemia remitted payments for their medicines from India. But the account owners quit as the volume of trade grew because they were afraid of getting into trouble.

Lu took over the transfer role. He bought credit cards at an online shop in 2012 to remit payments for more than 1,000 patients a month. He said he didn't realize that the shop was "an illegal group specializing in credit card trade" until he was caught by police in November 2013.

He was prosecuted in Yuanjiang, Hunan province, in July 2014. The court was scheduled to hear the case in late November but it was postponed because of his health.

"I've just told those that are sick as me the medicine that can maintain our lives," he told the Oriental Morning Post. "They didn't buy medicines from me and I earned no difference or charged any fees."

Chinese Business View quoted him as saying: "If I were taken back in time, I would do the same. Our national policies cannot cover every patient. What I did is complementary to the shortcomings of the policies."

For him, the biggest benefit from providing his accounts might be the free drugs provided to him by the Indian company, as they had done with the previous account providers. Yet Lu said the exemption was not a big deal for him.

Prosecutor Luo said: "Law has its own bottom line. It is out of the question to give him an immunity from criminal liabilities just because he did it for others. Otherwise he would be followed and the law would be pointless."

According to the latest judicial interpretation by the Supreme Court released in November, the sale of a small number of unlicensed overseas medicines that do not damage or delay treatment is not considered a crime.

There is some humanity in the policy, Liu Guiming, chief-editor of Democracy and Law magazine, told The Paper.

It takes care of individual cases. When there is a patient in need of such medicine at home, the Indian drug is an option for consideration, Liu said.

Yet for cancer patients that need to take anti-tumor drugs in the long-term, it is easy to cross the line.

Lu said Gleevec in China is probably sold at the highest price in the world, much more than the $2,200 it costs in the United States. He called on foundations to help resolve the medical bills for cancer patients and suggested governments negotiate with companies to cut prices.

He said he hoped more anti-tumor drugs would be covered by national medical insurance. However Xiao Zesheng, a law professor at Nanjing University, told The Paper that paying too high prices for anti-tumor medicines will damage others' interests and is unfair to them. "The key is the high prices," he said.



Why choose to willfully omit the total number of trade for imports by nation(which is a blanket reflection of the amount of dependency Indians have on Chinese goods-

no matter how creative in cooking up self-invented theories in distorting the situation in reality you are, or https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cherry_picking only data on components that fits your agenda)
?
Well spotted, the UN trade map data is all a global conspiracy of self-invented theories to hide the world's dependence on China products :rofl: , Can't still believe you people are so thick

Largest trading partners[edit]
India's largest trade partners with their total trade (sum of imports and exports) in millions of US dollars for financial year 2014–15 were as follows:[4]



Rank Country Exports Imports Total Trade Trade Balance
- All countries 310,338.47 447,964.38 758,301.08 -137,625.92
1
23px-Flag_of_the_People%27s_Republic_of_China.svg.png
China 11,934.25 60,413.17 72,347.42 -48,478.91
2
23px-Flag_of_the_United_States.svg.png
United States 42,448.66 21,814.60 64,263.26 20,634.05
3
23px-Flag_of_the_United_Arab_Emirates.svg.png
United Arab Emirates 33,028.08 26,139.91 59,167.99 6,888.17

Seems like your desperation is leading you to CCP level intellectual dishonesty.

Total trade includes both Indian imports from China as well Indian exports to China

How is India at mercy of China for exporting its products to China? :woot: CCP economics 101?

Going by that logic China being an exporter to India is at India mercy or the other way around? So which is it? make up your mind before you discuss any further :lol:

Infact the chinese exports have made the economic crisis worldwide and made the economies of many countries to go down.

Chinese exports are mainly eletronic items, toys and other domestic items , the chinese food exports are going to only those countries with whom the Chinese are having military alliance such as Russian Federation, North Korea etc.
Chinese dumping has always been an issue, it has come at major cost of brand China being equated to low quality not just among India but among Pakistanis as well

Any CCP devotee Chinese who can understand urdu will commit suicide after watching this: :enjoy:
 
Are you sure? If you didn't realize, you've been put back 30 years.
If you can call this successful, I don't want to know what UNSUCCESSFUL is. Lol...

Either you are ignorant or you never knew the history about those so called sanctions. LOL

https://www.nonproliferation.org/wp-content/uploads/npr/morrow64.pdf

And an Excerpt from the above doc.

"Just six months after the sanctions were announced, however, the United States had lifted virtually all of them. The process of weakening the sanctions in place against India and Pakistan had actually begun in July 1998, when the Senate voted to exempt food exports from sanctions.2 On October 21, 1998, Congress passed the Brownback Amendment, which gave President Clinton the authority to waive certain economic sanctions in place against India and Pakistan and to resume trade financing and other assistance programs for up to 12 months."

If those actions drag us by 30 years, good god what would happen if a real economic sanctions are implemented over us ?? :p:
 
Last edited:
Either you are ignorant or you never knew the history about those so called sanctions. LOL

https://www.nonproliferation.org/wp-content/uploads/npr/morrow64.pdf

And an Excerpt from the above doc.

"Just six months after the sanctions were announced, however, the United States had lifted virtually all of them. The process of weakening the sanctions in place against India and Pakistan had actually begun in July 1998, when the Senate voted to exempt food exports from sanctions.2 On October 21, 1998, Congress passed the Brownback Amendment, which gave President Clinton the authority to waive certain economic sanctions in place against India and Pakistan and to resume trade financing and other assistance programs for up to 12 months."

If these actions drag us by 30 years, good god what would happen if a real economic sanctions are implemented over us ?? :p:
Don't be so hard on him, he is perhaps merely victim of Chinese calendar usage :D where 3 year sanctions cause us to go back by 30 years
 
Learn how to read and interpret data :lol:

The listing of Chinese import image shows imports forming a majority i.e >50%

Pharmaceuticals or APIs were not mentioned in that listing.

Electronics was chosen to be expanded due to constant Chinese delusion of Indian heavy dependence on electronic products such as cellphones.




Now that you have mentioned APIs, here is some data

India has its own developed API industry

indian-apis-active-pharmaceuticals-ingredients-analysis-3-638.jpg


http://www.slideshare.net/sunilzon/indian-ap-is-analysis

And in Asia it is second to China in API companies:

TR-Figure%201%20Asian%20API%20Production%20Companies%20by%20Country.jpg


http://connect.dcat.org/blogs/value...utical-and-api-positions-in-asia#.WBd9ldUrKM8

In the event of Chinese embargo on APIs to India, India will merely switch importing from other nations until domestic manufacturing can match the demand. Unless you can cook up CCP stats showing China is the only API supplier on the planet.:D

Besides while frothing and salivating at pictures of Indians requiring medical assistance.
Perhaps you should be paying attention to Chinese cancer patients risking jail in order to obtain cheaper medicines from India.
Your Govt insecurity of Indian pharmaceuticals obtaining a market share in China is costing Chinese lives.

But i guess in yours and CCP Govt and it devotee perverted minds these mainland Chinese citizens do not deserve to live for daring to obtain medicines from India and make great celestial Zhongguo look bad:tdown:

Lucky that your ancestors migrated to Singapore to escape these harsh realities.



When patients get caught between cancer and crime - China - Chinadaily.com.cn

After businessman Lu Yong was charged with "the sale of fake drugs" and "impairing credit card administration", the case once again set off debates over unlicensed overseas anti-tumor medicines.

In contrast with patented drugs sold for higher prices, partially resulting from huge R&D expenditure by initial developers, the compulsory license practice enabled an Indian generic version to be more affordable. In China, there is also such a stipulation in patent law, which has never been resorted to.

The 46-year-old owner of a textile export company in Wuxi, Jiangsu province, Lu helped buy Indian medicines, which are unlicensed in China, via credit cards that turned out to be illegal.

Under the current legal system, drugs that have not been given the green light by related authorities are considered fake, even if they are effective, prosecutor Luo Jian, who is dealing with the case, told Beijing Times.

People who provide accounts for the sale of fake drugs will be treated as accomplices, according to the law, Luo said.

Lu himself was diagnosed with chronic myeloid leukemia in 2002 and began to take Gleevec, developed by Swiss pharmaceutical giant Novartis for use in the treatment of multiple cancers.

The anti-tumor drug recommended by his doctor was priced around 23,500 yuan ($3,777) per box at that time and he needed to take one box a month.

As the medicine is not covered by the national medical insurance system, he told Chinese Business View that he spent 600,000 to 700,000 yuan on his treatment in the first two years after his diagnosis and was almost broke.

In 2004, Lu began to turn to Gleevec's Indian version, Veenat, which had a similar effect yet cost much less, 3,000 yuan, if bought directly from India. He shared his find with other leukemia patients in support groups at social network platform QQ. As a result, more than 1,000 members of the groups followed suit.

Complicated procedures that involve filing various documents in English for the shipments remained a "torture" for many of these new buyers. So Lu served as an interpreter for them, free of charge.

The price of Veenat continued to fall over the years, because of growing group purchases. The cost, including mail charges, had dropped to around 200 yuan by September 2013, Lu said.

To tap into the huge underground market, the Indian company opened bank accounts in China to facilitate remittance yet faced frequent problems due to restrictions and technical issues in transnational payments.

The company asked Lu, one of their earliest Chinese buyers, to use his own account as a bridge, he told media.

They had previously used accounts belonging to two patients in Yunnan province, through which Lu and others suffering from leukemia remitted payments for their medicines from India. But the account owners quit as the volume of trade grew because they were afraid of getting into trouble.

Lu took over the transfer role. He bought credit cards at an online shop in 2012 to remit payments for more than 1,000 patients a month. He said he didn't realize that the shop was "an illegal group specializing in credit card trade" until he was caught by police in November 2013.

He was prosecuted in Yuanjiang, Hunan province, in July 2014. The court was scheduled to hear the case in late November but it was postponed because of his health.

"I've just told those that are sick as me the medicine that can maintain our lives," he told the Oriental Morning Post. "They didn't buy medicines from me and I earned no difference or charged any fees."

Chinese Business View quoted him as saying: "If I were taken back in time, I would do the same. Our national policies cannot cover every patient. What I did is complementary to the shortcomings of the policies."

For him, the biggest benefit from providing his accounts might be the free drugs provided to him by the Indian company, as they had done with the previous account providers. Yet Lu said the exemption was not a big deal for him.

Prosecutor Luo said: "Law has its own bottom line. It is out of the question to give him an immunity from criminal liabilities just because he did it for others. Otherwise he would be followed and the law would be pointless."

According to the latest judicial interpretation by the Supreme Court released in November, the sale of a small number of unlicensed overseas medicines that do not damage or delay treatment is not considered a crime.

There is some humanity in the policy, Liu Guiming, chief-editor of Democracy and Law magazine, told The Paper.

It takes care of individual cases. When there is a patient in need of such medicine at home, the Indian drug is an option for consideration, Liu said.

Yet for cancer patients that need to take anti-tumor drugs in the long-term, it is easy to cross the line.

Lu said Gleevec in China is probably sold at the highest price in the world, much more than the $2,200 it costs in the United States. He called on foundations to help resolve the medical bills for cancer patients and suggested governments negotiate with companies to cut prices.

He said he hoped more anti-tumor drugs would be covered by national medical insurance. However Xiao Zesheng, a law professor at Nanjing University, told The Paper that paying too high prices for anti-tumor medicines will damage others' interests and is unfair to them. "The key is the high prices," he said.




Well spotted, the UN trade map data is all a global conspiracy of self-invented theories to hide the world's dependence on China products :rofl: , Can't still believe you people are so thick


Chinese dumping has always been an issue, it has come at major cost of brand China being equated to low quality not just among India but among Pakistanis as well

Any CCP devotee Chinese who can understand urdu will commit suicide after watching this: :enjoy:

= https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Proof_by_intimidation

You can be read like an open storybook:

msc987432.jpg


You post images after images and articles after articles in a long text wall irrelevant to the topic at hand with the https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Self-serving_bias that you have jsut to wow the audience thinking into you have some serious validity to your claims and 'predicted' that 'India will merely switch importing from other nations until domestic manufacturing can match the demand.'

Source: https://defence.pk/threads/boycott-...ound-investments.458169/page-11#ixzz4OfzLgwHM

Well spotted, the UN trade map data is all a global conspiracy of self-invented theories to hide the world's dependence on China products :rofl: , Can't still believe you people are so thick

Refer to:

no matter how creative in cooking up self-invented theories in distorting the situation in reality?

Since u focused on India's trade exports to China now(when the topic at hand is about India's reliance on Chinese imports) why yet again- intentionally https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cherry_picking by deliberately omitting the trade deficit.

Total trade includes both Indian imports from China as well Indian exports to China

How is India at mercy of China for exporting its products to China? :woot: CCP economics 101?

Going by that logic China being an exporter to India is at India mercy or the other way around? So which is it? make up your mind before you discuss any further :lol:



When one resorts down to the level of https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ad_hominem , it reveal your own desperation in convincing the audience of your own distortion of reality.

Seems like your desperation is leading you to CCP level intellectual dishonesty.
But i guess in yours and CCP Govt and it devotee perverted minds these mainland Chinese citizens do not deserve to live for daring to obtain medicines from India and make great celestial Zhongguo look bad:tdown:

Lucky that your ancestors migrated to Singapore to escape these harsh realities.


72676259.jpg
 
China is more concerned that the boycott will negatively affect Chinese enterprises to invest in India.
which means chinese govt won't do anything negative. it would be investors volunteerily doing it.
it had increased to 2.5 Billion in last 3 months.

Let me clear some misconception, Chinese investors (mainly institutional investors and Hedge Funds to be precise) are investing mainly on successful Indian companies rather than investing on units of Chinese companies in India, ever thought why ??

They are investing here because they expect reasonable returns in long term. Now do you think these guy's to be dumb enough top pull out their investments from one of the biggest and fastest growing markets at present merely because some of Chinese think tanks think so ?? LOL :-)

http://www.vccircle.com/news/econom...ts-23-bn-past-3-months-against-135-bn-2000-16

= https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Proof_by_intimidation

You can be read like an open storybook:

msc987432.jpg


You post images after images and articles after articles in a long text wall irrelevant to the topic at hand with the https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Self-serving_bias that you have jsut to wow the audience thinking into you have some serious validity to your claims and 'predicted' that 'India will merely switch importing from other nations until domestic manufacturing can match the demand.'

Source: https://defence.pk/threads/boycott-...ound-investments.458169/page-11#ixzz4OfzLgwHM



Refer to:



Since u focused on India's trade exports to China now(when the topic at hand is about India's reliance on Chinese imports) why yet again- intentionally https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cherry_picking by deliberately omitting the trade deficit.





When one resorts down to the level of https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ad_hominem , it reveal your own desperation in convincing the audience of your own distortion of reality.





72676259.jpg


A simple question ?? Suppose if Chinese economy collapses all together due to any reason in future ( zero chance though :)). Still other nations who do trade with them have to survive right ??

U.S.S.R was once an economic tiger, yet it collapsed, did that made any country that had intensive trade with them bankrupt ?? Any single example ?? :)

Therefor, India don't need China anything more than China needs India. :)
 
= https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Proof_by_intimidation

You can be read like an open storybook:

msc987432.jpg


You post images after images and articles after articles in a long text wall irrelevant to the topic at hand with the https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Self-serving_bias that you have jsut to wow the audience thinking into you have some serious validity to your claims and 'predicted' that 'India will merely switch importing from other nations until domestic manufacturing can match the demand.'

Source: https://defence.pk/threads/boycott-...ound-investments.458169/page-11#ixzz4OfzLgwHM



Refer to:



Since u focused on India's trade exports to China now(when the topic at hand is about India's reliance on Chinese imports) why yet again- intentionally https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cherry_picking by deliberately omitting the trade deficit.





When one resorts down to the level of https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ad_hominem , it reveal your own desperation in convincing the audience of your own distortion of reality.





72676259.jpg

Not a single rebuttal to my stats, :D

Not surprising as it only confirms my judgement of your reading comprehension/ data interpretation and logical reasoning skills. :)

I guess there will more posts from you shooting self-goals :lol:
 
A simple question ?? Suppose if Chinese economy collapses all together due to any reason in future ( zero chance though :)). Still other nations who do trade with them have to survive right ??

U.S.S.R was once an economic tiger, yet it collapsed, did that made any country that had intensive trade with them bankrupt ?? Any single example ?? :)

You are asking a question within your own question- am i supposed to answer it?

Therefor, India don't need China anything more than China needs India. :)

72676259.jpg
[/QUOTE]
 
Not a single rebuttal to my stats, :D

Not surprising as it only confirms my judgement of your reading comprehension/ data interpretation and logical reasoning skills. :)

I guess there will more posts from you shooting self-goals :lol:
= https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Red_herring

I have already (and only need to) rebuked your wall-long text of arguements just by the Trade deficit alone.

Continue living in your self-consolating delusion.



72676259.jpg



Alibaba-Jack-Ma-Laughing-At-IPO-First-Day.jpg




No need friend, but as I said loud and clear "India don't need China for anything more than China needs India". :)

72791303.jpg
 
Last edited:

Pakistan Affairs Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom