What's new

Book reveals why Dr Khan was removed from KRL

fatman17

PDF THINK TANK: CONSULTANT
Joined
Apr 24, 2007
Messages
32,563
Reaction score
98
Country
Pakistan
Location
Pakistan
Book reveals why Dr Khan was removed from KRL

By Iftikhar A. Khan

Friday, 23 Oct, 2009

Dr Khan was removed as the chairman after he resisted oversight of his operations by the Command and Control set-up.

ISLAMABAD: Dr A. Q. Khan was removed as chairman of the Khan Research Laboratories (KRL) after he resisted oversight of his operations by the Command and Control set-up, reveals a book launched here on Thursday.

Brig (retd) Naeem Ahmad Salik has authored the book titled ‘The genesis of South Asian nuclear programme: Pakistan’s perspective’.

Brig Salik, who retired four years ago, was among a small group of officers who conceived and set up the nuclear command and control structure and formulated the nuclear policy after the May 1998 tests.

Currently, he is teaching at National Defence University (NDU) and is associated with the Department of Nuclear Politics and Strategic Stability in the faculty of contemporary studies.

The book says that after the establishment of the National Command and Control Authority in February 2000, the Strategic Plans Division started looking into the work of the strategic organisations.

It immediately met resistance from Dr Khan who did not want anyone to pry into his domain. There were, however, indications that something was amiss.

But without concrete evidence, laying hands on a person of Dr Khan’s stature could have meant political suicide for the government.

Yet, a decision was made to relieve Dr Khan as the KRL chairman and he was consequently retired on the expiry of his term of office.

Brig Salik says that throughout his procurement efforts, Dr Khan used Dubai as staging point where he reportedly had a warehouse managed by two Sri Lankan associates.

At some stage, in the late 1980s, Dr Khan realised that Pakistan’s programme was reaching a plateau, and he could profitably use his technical expertise, knowledge of European suppliers and personal rapport with them by reversing the flow of enrichment technology.

In addition, Dr Khan had developed a more efficient second-generation centrifuge known as P-2. As the P-2s replaced P-1 centrifuges, he had a surplus inventory of used P-1 machines.

The book refers to an allegation that the first contact with the Iranians took place in Switzerland, facilitated by a German engineer named Gotthard Lerch, a supplier and long-time friend of Dr Khan.

The first substantive exchange is reported to have taken place in Dubai in 1987. The network is reported to have handed over a one-page handwritten offer to the Iranians, detailing packages with prices ranging from millions to hundreds of millions of dollars.

It says investigations by Pakistani officials and other sources established that most of Dr Khan’s proliferation activities reportedly took place between 1988 and 1999.

Speaking at the launching ceremony of the book published by Oxford University Press, former chairman Joint Chiefs of Staff Committee, Gen (retd) Ehsanul Haq observed that the initial vulnerability of Pakistan’s strategic assets was over and nuclear weapons were fully secure under multi-layered safeguards.

He said robust custodial measures and strong export control regime were in place. Gen Haq said that the country’s nuclear programme was a product of national consensus, adding that successive governments had made contributions to consolidate it.

He called for maintaining this consensus and said it must not be allowed to be damaged at any cost.

Expressing the hope that a nuclear doctrine document of the country would be coming forth, he said things stood strategised.

Gen (retd) Haq said that nuclear deterrence had been the cornerstone of strategic stability in South Asia. He pointed out that Pakistan’s nuclear programme was India-centric.

‘We were not the first to test a nuclear device and hope will not conduct more tests unless India does so,’ he said.

Pakistan cannot afford and does not want to enter into a nuclear arms race with India, he said, adding that Pakistan had the capability to thwart any aggressive designs of the adversary.

Gen Haq said Pakistan could handle its security environment if there were no overloads from outside.

Defining external overloads, he talked about Afghan border and Afghan refugees, predator attacks by the US and sermons to ‘do more’ as well as the lingering Jammu and Kashmir dispute and India’s interference in Balochistan.

Ambassador Tariq Osman Hyder of NDU and defence analysts Dr Hasan Askari Rizvi and Dr Riffat Hussain also spoke.

Oxford University Press managing director Ameena Sayed presented address of welcome while Brig Salik made concluding remarks.
 
.
Book reveals why Dr Khan was removed from KRL

By Iftikhar A. Khan

Friday, 23 Oct, 2009

Dr Khan was removed as the chairman after he resisted oversight of his operations by the Command and Control set-up.

ISLAMABAD: Dr A. Q. Khan was removed as chairman of the Khan Research Laboratories (KRL) after he resisted oversight of his operations by the Command and Control set-up, reveals a book launched here on Thursday.

Brig (retd) Naeem Ahmad Salik has authored the book titled ‘The genesis of South Asian nuclear programme: Pakistan’s perspective’.

Brig Salik, who retired four years ago, was among a small group of officers who conceived and set up the nuclear command and control structure and formulated the nuclear policy after the May 1998 tests.

Currently, he is teaching at National Defence University (NDU) and is associated with the Department of Nuclear Politics and Strategic Stability in the faculty of contemporary studies.

The book says that after the establishment of the National Command and Control Authority in February 2000, the Strategic Plans Division started looking into the work of the strategic organisations.

It immediately met resistance from Dr Khan who did not want anyone to pry into his domain. There were, however, indications that something was amiss.

But without concrete evidence, laying hands on a person of Dr Khan’s stature could have meant political suicide for the government.

Yet, a decision was made to relieve Dr Khan as the KRL chairman and he was consequently retired on the expiry of his term of office.

Brig Salik says that throughout his procurement efforts, Dr Khan used Dubai as staging point where he reportedly had a warehouse managed by two Sri Lankan associates.

At some stage, in the late 1980s, Dr Khan realised that Pakistan’s programme was reaching a plateau, and he could profitably use his technical expertise, knowledge of European suppliers and personal rapport with them by reversing the flow of enrichment technology.

In addition, Dr Khan had developed a more efficient second-generation centrifuge known as P-2. As the P-2s replaced P-1 centrifuges, he had a surplus inventory of used P-1 machines.

The book refers to an allegation that the first contact with the Iranians took place in Switzerland, facilitated by a German engineer named Gotthard Lerch, a supplier and long-time friend of Dr Khan.

The first substantive exchange is reported to have taken place in Dubai in 1987. The network is reported to have handed over a one-page handwritten offer to the Iranians, detailing packages with prices ranging from millions to hundreds of millions of dollars.

It says investigations by Pakistani officials and other sources established that most of Dr Khan’s proliferation activities reportedly took place between 1988 and 1999.

Speaking at the launching ceremony of the book published by Oxford University Press, former chairman Joint Chiefs of Staff Committee, Gen (retd) Ehsanul Haq observed that the initial vulnerability of Pakistan’s strategic assets was over and nuclear weapons were fully secure under multi-layered safeguards.

He said robust custodial measures and strong export control regime were in place. Gen Haq said that the country’s nuclear programme was a product of national consensus, adding that successive governments had made contributions to consolidate it.

He called for maintaining this consensus and said it must not be allowed to be damaged at any cost.

Expressing the hope that a nuclear doctrine document of the country would be coming forth, he said things stood strategised.

Gen (retd) Haq said that nuclear deterrence had been the cornerstone of strategic stability in South Asia. He pointed out that Pakistan’s nuclear programme was India-centric.

‘We were not the first to test a nuclear device and hope will not conduct more tests unless India does so,’ he said.

Pakistan cannot afford and does not want to enter into a nuclear arms race with India, he said, adding that Pakistan had the capability to thwart any aggressive designs of the adversary.

Gen Haq said Pakistan could handle its security environment if there were no overloads from outside.

Defining external overloads, he talked about Afghan border and Afghan refugees, predator attacks by the US and sermons to ‘do more’ as well as the lingering Jammu and Kashmir dispute and India’s interference in Balochistan.

Ambassador Tariq Osman Hyder of NDU and defence analysts Dr Hasan Askari Rizvi and Dr Riffat Hussain also spoke.

Oxford University Press managing director Ameena Sayed presented address of welcome while Brig Salik made concluding remarks.
Strange that some of us still call him hero.A person who sells secrets of his country for his personal greed and benifits and embarrasses his country worldwide by openly admitting that he sold centrifuges to other countries.

It immediately met resistance from Dr Khan who did not want anyone to pry into his domain.
The biggest cause of his corruption was absolute power conferred to him without cheacks and balances someone has rightly said "power corrupts and absolute power corrupts".
 
Last edited:
.
he's our hero...n will remain!! n what he was doing wasn't selfishness it was to strengthen the Muslim world n pakistan in the Asia n in all around the world!!! if he were selfish then he did not have to do it for pakistan....!!!
Dr. A Q KHAN is a true patriotic Pakistani n due to grace of ALLAH n his hard work, we the Pakistanis are able to face the world despite our shameless current leaders!!!
 
.
he's our hero...n will remain!! n what he was doing wasn't selfishness it was to strengthen the Muslim world n pakistan in the Asia n in all around the world!!!
Dr. A Q KHAN is a true patriotic Pakistani n due to grace of ALLAH n his hard work, we the Pakistanis are able to face the world despite our shameless current leaders!!!
Oh for sake of muslim world! then why only Libya and Iran who PAID him with bucks;) and afterwards Libya openly confessed that A.Q Khan was involved in supplying it nuclear components and Irans centrifuge was found to be P-1 type,so the Muslims countries who were supplied by Khan openly blamed him.
I guess they never Knew about Khans noble intentions.By the way was North Korea muslim too?



if he were selfish then he did not have to do it for pakistan....!!!
Oh what should I say? if Pakistan had'nt made him chairman of KRL he would'nt have been able to make bucks
At some stage, in the late 1980s, Dr Khan realised that Pakistan’s programme was reaching a plateau, and he could profitably use his technical expertise, knowledge of European suppliers and personal rapport with them by reversing the flow of enrichment technology.
In addition, Dr Khan had developed a more efficient second-generation centrifuge known as P-2. As the P-2s replaced P-1 centrifuges, he had a surplus inventory of used P-1 machines.

Its so sad that all the credit of making the Nuclear weapons is given to A.Q Khan,he was just a part of the Nuclear program and the other scientist who really deserve appreciation are not given one percent of credit some of them are Dr Abdus Salam(Late),Munir Ahmed Khan and Dr Samar Mubarakmand and many others working under them.:hitwall:
 
Last edited:
. . .
Somethings are supposed to be left alone and be done with.

In my opinion, this book could have waited a few years, very odd timing for publishing this book.

Gen. Musharraf and his team successfully closed the chapter of our involvement in nuclear proliferation by blaming all on one person and then by keeping that one person out of Western reach.

The aim was not malign Dr A.Q. Khan because everyone knows that he is loved in Pakistan but the aim was to save his life from foreign assassins and to ensure that A.Q. Khan is not grilled by the Americans and others etc.

Thanks to Nawaz Sharif, CJP and others that Dr. sahib can give all statements and attract interesting parties again.

With this book, A.Q.Khan's recent statements and Zardari in office, there is a strong possibility that access to A.Q. Khan will be granted.
 
.
Surely now his vision is a lot different to what we have today ever since 9/11 we have changed a lot of preceptions on things so he can also come afresh with new views and new opinions by capturing and maligning him is surely more an insult to the man good or bad alone or not alone he bought nuclear technology to us surely you can't discount his efforts in anyway. Having an opinion on him is like having an opinion on the event of Karbala ( don't start this topic in any way) where history books narrate different versions of the same story.

I think he in a position of power would have been just as Human as you or I so to malign anyone on the basis of his choice of decision is surely not fair.
 
.
There is no doubt about Dr. A.Q. Khan's contribtion and no one can hurt his reputation in Pakistan or in the Islamic World. His statement on tv was also seen as his bid to help Pakistan.

My only request is that he should be careful in making statements. He helped Pakistan at that point and him stating things differently now will harm intersts of Pakistan.
 
.
The aim was not malign Dr A.Q. Khan because everyone knows that he is loved in Pakistan but the aim was to save his life from foreign assassins and to ensure that A.Q. Khan is not grilled by the Americans and others etc.
is saadgi par kaun na mar jye aey Khuda

The aim was neither to save Khan's life, nor to save him from interrogation from the US/Europe and International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) but simply to save the skin of the successive CinCs, plus other Army/Air force officials involved in the whole scandal and who made millions from it.
 
.
No dough there were many along the AQ-Khan in the Nuclear Programe . But he was the first to give a hope that Pakistan too can develope nuclear wepons like its rival India did .
I hardly dought that there was only AQ-Khan invloved in the whole proliferation scenario .

This book has been written in the context of the Book " Shoping for Bombs " .
After all the funding for Pak's Nukes came from multiple channels .
 
.
The aim was neither to save Khan's life, nor to save him from interrogation from the US/Europe and International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) but simply to save the skin of the successive CinCs, plus other Army/Air force officials involved in the whole scandal and who made millions from it.

Could you kindly prove your arguement on which army officials were defended and quote where you got the info from.
 
.
Could you kindly prove your arguement on which army officials were defended and quote where you got the info from.
Dr. Khan was only the head of the KRL. The security of the KRL has always been the responsibility of dedicated units of Army, which I understand, were never under the command of Dr. Khan. Similarly, the centrifuges were transported to Iran, N-Korea and Libya using C-130 air lifters flown by the PAF pilots. The C-130 air lifters were under the command of the PAF since KRL itself does not operate any C-130s. Common sense (I admit it is a rare commodity irrespective of what name suggests) tells that it was simply impossible for Dr. Khan or his civilian aides to bypass all the security of the KRL and transport the centrifuges to Iran, N-Korea and Libya without the assistance of the Army and the Air Force. Hence Dr. Khan and his civilian aides were not the only ones responsible in the proliferation of nuclear know-how and material-enrichment hardware.

By the way, I have worked for some time during 1997-1999 in Biological wing in KRL and I can tell you from my personal experience that you cannot take out a simple piece of paper without prior permission let alone a centrifuge.
 
Last edited:
.
Dr. Khan was only the head of the KRL. The security of the KRL has always been the responsibility of dedicated units of Army, which I understand, were never under the command of Dr. Khan. Similarly, the centrifuges were transported to Iran, N-Korea and Libya using C-130 air lifters flown by the PAF pilots. The C-130 air lifters were under the command of the PAF since KRL itself does not operate any C-130s. Common sense (I admit it is a rare commodity irrespective of what name suggests) tells that it was simply impossible for Dr. Khan or his civilians aides to bypass all the security of the KRL and transport the centrifuges to Iran, N-Korea and Libya without the assistance of the Army and the Air Force. Hence Dr. Khan and his civilian aides were not the only ones responsible in the proliferation of nuclear know-how and material-enrichment hardware.

By the way, I have worked for some time during 1997-1999 in Biological wing in KRL and I can tell you from my personal experience that you cannot take out a simple piece of paper without prior permission let alone a centrifuge.

Could be the case that both parties worked in hand I mean if it was the army that sold us out I am sure they would have done their in house cleaning by now and why does the PML(N) call him a hero did KRL have any political alliance or more people from a certain party?
 
. .

Pakistan Defence Latest Posts

Pakistan Affairs Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom