deckingraj
SENIOR MEMBER
![](/styles/default/xenforo/ranks/Brigadier.jpg)
- Joined
- Oct 8, 2009
- Messages
- 5,192
- Reaction score
- 4
- Country
- Location
This is unrealistic . I have often wondered why the Pakistani experts say -- They would first explode a nuke device on their own soil , then on the invading forces , then on enemy territory , military installations , then on civilian centres and so on ....
The common standard doctrine of first strike -- the world around , like for instance . U.S , NATO is a massive strike aiming to cripple an adversary's strategic assets as much as possible.
After using a nuke on Indian forces , how can Pakistani Thinktanks not guarantee a response , or base their strategies upon the fact that a response will be limited or some kind of a limited scenario ???
Exploding a nuke in the first place , cannot possibly be done as a warning , but always a full fledged attack/defense ....
So a first strike is always designed to inflict maximum damage -- and will always be aimed at critical opposing territory. Pakistan would be no exception to this line of thinking ....
Exactly, this is the same point that i raised many times when we were discussing about so-called tactical nuke missile...The line of thought was that it would be stupid to use this missile...Better go for a massive first strike and hope that it damages most of the retaliation capability....