Penguin
ELITE MEMBER
- Joined
- Jan 11, 2009
- Messages
- 13,047
- Reaction score
- 56
Sponsorship money is 'free' money to a person for that person to promote a brand or strengthen a brand-image. This means the receiving person has to do X things (e.g. wear logo, endorse sponsor, do meetings etc) and refrain from Y things (e.g drug use, paedophilia, expressing political views etc.) It's a business deal. I don't see why BMW wouldn't have the right to be concerned: the matter is not whether that athlete is seen with someone, the matter is whether the brand that pays the athlete wants to appear as associated with someone via it's sponsored athlete. This is not a freedom of expression or association issue. When you take sponsorship money, you contractually commit to certain things.
Last edited: