Thunder.Storm
FULL MEMBER
- Joined
- Apr 8, 2015
- Messages
- 584
- Reaction score
- 0
- Country
- Location
I checked the video at youtube it's 6 years old clip.Air chief.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I checked the video at youtube it's 6 years old clip.Air chief.
But its almost the same size as an f-16, it should be able to carry at aleast 90 percent of the f-16 payload with the right engines and modified airframe(like the gripen ng).Hi,
Due to its size, it will never carry "enough" payload. It is a small aircraft and it has sufficient payload for its size.
what makes you think blk 1 & blk2 are not advanced and not lethal?Does any one know that if there would be any change in the airframe of JFT blck 3 ?? and will it be made with the same motto cheap and reliable ? or PAF would go for advanced and lethal ??
what makes you think blk 1 & blk2 are not advanced and not lethal?
you can't compare it with the 4.5 gen jets of todays world
as i said it is reliable and cheap but not as Advanced and lethal as a 4.5 gen jet
JFT was never conceived to be a 4.5 or 4.5+ generation fighter, it is exactly what it was supposed to be i.e. an affordable 4th generation multi role fighter
hmmm let me guess "world and my analysis" i m not saying its not a good aircraft its good no doubt about it but its good in its own way you can't compare it with the 4.5 gen jets of todays world
as i said it is reliable and cheap but not as Advanced and lethal as a 4.5 gen jet ....... e.g (gripen, mirage 2K, May be Mig 29 upgraded versions) and i m asking because JFT is our front line fighter means it has to face MKI's, Mirage, Migs, Jaguars ......
so you mean we are going to put JFT against Mirage 2K Mig 29 jaguars mki's like this only because we are happy with it :/
i mean no matter what you say we have to make it a fighter which can compete against the fighters of today and tommorow ....
hmmm let me guess "world and my analysis" i m not saying its not a good aircraft its good no doubt about it but its good in its own way you can't compare it with the 4.5 gen jets of todays world
as i said it is reliable and cheap but not as Advanced and lethal as a 4.5 gen jet ....... e.g (gripen, mirage 2K, May be Mig 29 upgraded versions) and i m asking because JFT is our front line fighter means it has to face MKI's, Mirage, Migs, Jaguars ......
How so? Same upgrades can be applied to Grippen as well BVR missile , good radar.. etc etc .. no? Also when JF-17 missing one more hard point!Hi,
The world of smart BVR's and aesa radar is a totally different world. If you load up a B 52 bomber with BVR missiles with a good radar---it will wreak havoc on the enemy 4 and 4.5 gen aircraft----.
Now---to top it off---you add aesa to the JF 17----you equip it with a BVR 100 KM range---you also have off bore sight missile---you have an aircraft that can compete with anything in the 4 and 4.5 gen range of regardless of what it is.
The total package of current JF 17 is superior to the Grippen.
How so? Same upgrades can be applied to Grippen as well BVR missile , good radar.. etc etc .. no? Also when JF-17 missing one more hard point!
You have got the idea of JF-17 whole wrong. JF-17 was not developed to match each and every fighter in the world it was built as per the requirements of PAF.hmmm let me guess "world and my analysis" i m not saying its not a good aircraft its good no doubt about it but its good in its own way you can't compare it with the 4.5 gen jets of todays world
as i said it is reliable and cheap but not as Advanced and lethal as a 4.5 gen jet ....... e.g (gripen, mirage 2K, May be Mig 29 upgraded versions) and i m asking because JFT is our front line fighter means it has to face MKI's, Mirage, Migs, Jaguars ......
How so? Same upgrades can be applied to Grippen as well BVR missile , good radar.. etc etc .. no? Also when JF-17 missing one more hard point!
Does any one know that if there would be any change in the airframe of JFT blck 3 ?? and will it be made with the same motto cheap and reliable ? or PAF would go for advanced and lethal ??