Blasphemy case registered against Imran Khan and PTI leadership

[VCheng]

Really? That's the basics of separation of powers doctrine

The constitution is clear about it:

68	Restriction on discussion in Majlis-e-Shoora (Parliament). No discussion shall take place in 167[Majlis-e-Shoora (Parliament)] 167 with respect to the conduct of any Judge of the Supreme Court or of a High Court in the discharge of his duties.
69	Courts not to inquire into proceedings of Majlis-e-Shoora (Parliament). (1) The validity of any proceedings in 168[Majlis-e-Shoora (Parliament)] 168 shall not be called in question on the ground of any irregularity of procedure. (2) No officer or member of 169[Majlis-e-Shoora (Parliament)] 169 in whom powers are vested by or under the Constitution for regulating procedure or the conduct of business, or for maintaining order in 170[Majlis-e-Shoora (Parliament)] 170, shall be subject to the jurisdiction of any court in respect of the exercise by him of those powers. (3) In this Article, 171[Majlis-e-Shoora (Parliament)] 171 has the same meaning as in Article 66.

So what does proviso mean "on the ground of any irregularity of procedure" when the Speaker is bound to hold a vote on a valid VoNC "not before the expiration of three days, or later than seven days"? Is refusal to hold a vote "procedure" or a direct violation of the Constitution?

Pretty clear here too:

95 Vote of no-confidence against Prime Minister.
(1) A resolution for a vote of no-confidence moved by not less than twenty per centum of the total membership of the National Assembly may be passed against the Prime Minister by the National Assembly.

(2) A resolution referred to in clause (1) shall not be voted upon before the expiration of three days, or later than seven days, from the day on which such resolution is moved in the National Assembly.

(3) A resolution referred to in clause (1) shall not be moved in the National Assembly while the National Assembly is considering demands for grants submitted to it in the Annual Budget Statement.

(4) If the resolution referred to in clause (1) is passed by a majority of the total membership of the National Assembly, the Prime Minister shall cease to hold office.

 

[xyx007]

but some slaves will remain worshiping kukri baby zardari nani420 and others generation after generation .

As you can see, they are just front faces, and neutral cannot remove these salves from courts completely if you look at their cases. Therefore, their thread is still under the control of neutral hands and neutrals are not willing to give a majority to IK should they do that, they would lose control and be out of the game for the Master political witch hunt.

 

[COOKie LOOkie....]

Really? Where does it say in the Constitution?

I have a simple question if you can please answer.
Can you tell me if anyone who is out on bail in a convicted case hold any type of public office? It is lawfully correct?

 

[Norwegian]

So what does proviso mean "on the ground of any irregularity of procedure" when the Speaker is bound to hold a vote on a valid VoNC "not before the expiration of three days, or later than seven days"? Is refusal to hold a vote "procedure" or a direct violation of the Constitution?

NAB cases are to be decided within 30 days as per constitution. I don't see courts opening at midnight to enforce that Patwari

 

[Imran Khan]

I have a simple question if you can please answer.
Can you tell me if anyone who is out on bail in a convicted case hold any type of public office? It is lawfully correct?

another run away from jail to UK and his daughter get out of jail to take care that criminal as he was sick but since then she is free roaming and doing politics . ye konsa bhen ka takka aieen or qanoon hai ?

 

[Ghazwa-e-Hind]

Some of you guys cant be serious being OK with a PM and cabinet that is filled with crooks.

I mean being pro or anti Imran Khan aside, how do guys justify this.

People have really lost their marbles.

Only people who have running streams of corruption money are against Imran Khan.

Majority of Pakistani population is pro PTI, hence the millions of people on street, not just in Pakistan but around the world.


Karachi - The most populated city of Pakistan:

https://twitter.com/x/status/1513219873064857604

 

[COOKie LOOkie....]

NAB cases are to be decided within 30 days as per constitution. I don't see courts opening at midnight to enforce that Patwari

How dare you criticize the courts like that. thats contempt of court. Better apologize dude, you are not a shareef how dare you.

 

[M. Sarmad]

So what does proviso mean "on the ground of any irregularity of procedure" when the Speaker is bound to hold a vote on a valid VoNC "not before the expiration of three days, or later than seven days"? Is refusal to hold a vote "procedure" or a direct violation of the Constitution?

The point is, It's only for the speaker to decide how to conduct the business of the house. The speaker found the VoNC in contradiction with the Article 5 of the Constitution and dismissed it. The PM, using his Constitutional right, asked the president to dissolve the assemblies.

The Courts cannot undo steps taken by the legislature. The constitution doesn't give that authority to the courts. At max they could give their opinion (that too if asked). What SC did is a clear and blatant violation of Constitution and overstepping of its jurisdiction.

 

[COOKie LOOkie....]

another run away from jail to UK and his daughter get out of jail to take care that criminal as he was sick but since then she is free roaming and doing politics . ye konsa bhen ka takka aieen or qanoon hai ?

Look at the global rankings of pakistan judiciary system, Its so self explanatory, its honestly useless to ask such questions.

 

[Ghazwa-e-Hind]

The point is, It's only for the speaker to decide how to conduct the business of the house. The speaker found the VoNC in contradiction with the Article 5 of the Constitution and dismissed it. The PM, using his Constitutional right, asked the president to dissolve the assemblies.

The Courts cannot undo steps taken by the legislature. The constitution doesn't give that authority to the courts. At max they could give their opinion (that too if asked). What SC did is a clear and blatant violation of Constitution and overstepping of its jurisdiction.

He's playing you with technicalities, aka wasting your time. He's pro PDM

It's clear as day that Supreme court can't intervene in parliamentary matters. It's already been discussed like 10000 times here.

 

[xyx007]

One thing I would like to mention here is whatever IK's future holds in the upcoming days, I'd like to mention that IK has shook up the whole nation mindset, including people of the 60-year age group who previously supported neutral, but this time I'd like to point out that IK has shook up the entire nation to create a perfect recipe for Revolution World Ever Seen Before. I think he created so many matches that any spark on fuel will cause this neutral game to end forever.

 

[ghazi52]

Country's condition is like this, but still they are selling.............'s.

 

[mudas777]

So it is an indirect charge. I suppose they have to prove that Imran was personally behind that incident to implicate him.

Lol do you think proving that charge in Pakistan is that difficult when courts and establishment are at one page.
No more Dharna's, if this evil clan want to play dirty then put them in the washing machine and set the washing machine at the highest RPM. Occupy the airports too so they can't fly out either as country our integrity, unity and well being doesn't matters to them then why should their lives matter to our nation.

 

[Zowais]

Rather than defending these ridiculously false allegations, IK should form the narrative that PDM+ (everyone knows whose the + here) thugs' have their god of foreign establishment. Since IK has committed blasphemy of naming americans publicly, he is facing these baseless allegations.
Then he should tell people that they have two choices, either support PDM+ and make their generations slave, or act independently, standup and resolve this history of slavery once and for all.

 

[karachidude86]

Who ever is responsible should be trialed, may it be niazi or his puppies for this despicable pathetic lowly act!