Areesh
ELITE MEMBER
- Joined
- Mar 30, 2010
- Messages
- 45,157
- Reaction score
- 3
- Country
- Location
Reading Richard Dawkins who advocates rape as a human right
Kia chutya aurat thi BC
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
who decides who is progressive or not ?Brother, I so agree!
Like you said, the Chinese government should now be proactive and active in supporting and helping the progressive forces in Pakistan, instead of the old and outdated foreign policy (completely ignoring the realities of the brotherly country, remaining neutral all the time, while being afraid of various Western, domestic, and Pakistani opinion forces, and timid to act in terms of economic and material support in military, economic, political, etc.), in the past, maybe these policies were the right ones, but now they are outdated and have not kept up with the times.
If the Chinese government continues this foreign policy of inaction, it will only leave Pakistan in the hands of corrupt elements, foreign agents, in control of power in Pakistan, just like the corrupt elements around the world, who will suck all the wealth dry, and only their wealth will grow, without the development of the country.
Only by proactively helping Pakistan's progressive forces and accelerating its rapid economic, political, and military growth will these loans and aid be most effective and in the best interest of both peoples.
Loans or aid between Pakistan and China has never been the issue, the issue has always been to proactively monitor and ensure that the money is used to promote the progress of the country and its people. As a Chinese, I personally strongly suggest that our national government should increase aid and loans based on proactive support of Pakistan's domestic progressive forces.
The reason why India doesn't have these terrorist attacks is because they don't border Iran and Afghanistan. The powers that be want Pakistan to become invisible and leashed.
Our military leaders islamized
What part of foundation of country do you not understand? The country was formed on the basis of religion, not caste or ethnicity.
Aspiring Dawkins terrorists like you are nothing but a nuisance
There was no such thing as suicide bombing pre 9/11. This is Afghan culture which marinated in Pakistan since the refugees arrived in the 80s. There is a Taliban school in Peshawar ffs. Thank you Zia you prick. Radicalized Pakistan to become a good doggy for the yanks in Afghanistan.
What part of foundation of country do you not understand? The country was formed on the basis of religion, not caste or ethnicity.
Aspiring Dawkins terrorists like you are nothing but a nuisance
People were blowing themselves up long before 911 happened. All you people can do is rub out your fantasies whenever tragedy strikes with your preconceived misconstrued beliefs and biases, like some animalistic instinct or a tick.
Background is hilly area ? Maybe one from last failed attack in Panjgur/Noshki.Bajwa has damaged the state of Pak to that stage where coming back is not easy for his sheer amount of incompetency, cowardice, treachery, insensitivity and lust to stick with post of COAS so much so that he has even made PA a joke where number of his foot soldiers die day and night and DGISPR is forced to lie about conspiracy vs interference bull shit.
We all are witnessing the state of Pak going down the gutter with Bajwa. Bajwa definitely deserved the gutter but not Pak.
There is a clear difference in being a normal muslim and being a militant. Read up on what your military leaders did in the 80s and how it brainwashed an entire generation.
Sipah Sahaba/Lashkar and hundreds of organizations were mushroomed under state patranage and used for its gains. Not even going to go into how they messed up this country during thr afghan jihad and how they made "good militants" and send them to fight russians.