What's new

Billionaire’s Howitzers to Test Defense Policy: Corporate India

Kloitra

SENIOR MEMBER
Joined
Sep 5, 2012
Messages
4,080
Reaction score
4
Country
India
Location
Canada
Billionaire

India’s aim to procure 75 percent of its defense supplies locally in a decade is in jeopardy as companies struggle to navigate rules on manufacturing and selling weapons.

Billionaire Baba Kalyani’s group, which plans a prototype of India’s first privately-built Howitzer gun next year, will be unable to test it as regulations prohibit firms from using military facilities, said Amit Kalyani, executive director at Bharat Forge (BHFC) Ltd., the flagship firm of the group. Mahindra & Mahindra Ltd. (MM)’s proposal for a venture with Rafael Advanced Defense Systems Ltd. was denied by the government, which didn’t give a reason for the rejection.

“This is not rocket science,” Kalyani said in an interview. “We need to just study what other countries have done. There are examples of a strong partnership between the defense establishment and the private industry.”

The world’s largest importer of arms last year may miss its target to boost local supplies as nebulous regulations threaten to derail Kalyani, Larsen & Toubro Ltd. (LT) and Mahindra’s plan to tap the annual 867.4 billion rupee ($14 billion) market. Rules don’t specify the type of weapons companies can build or the restriction on partnerships.

“There is a lot of talk about encouraging private industry in defense,” said Deba Ranjan Mohanty, chairman of Indicia Research & Advisory, a New Delhi-based defense researcher. “When a state decides to open up its defense production, it needs to devise a strategy to see it through. Otherwise, it’ll all be empty talk.”
Firing Range

India in 2001 allowed local companies with up to 26 percent foreign ownership, to bid for arms contracts. A decade later the country revised its policy on military production to reserve certain manufacturing for Indian companies.

Still, rules to preclude private manufacturers from using defense testing facilities means Kalyani won’t be able to use amenities such as the Pokhran range, the country’s largest field firing area. Without testing products, companies won’t be able to bid for contracts, said Mohanty.

A venture between Larsen and Cassidian Ltd. formed in 2011 to make avionics, radars and electronic warfare equipment is still awaiting industrial license. Larsen spokesman Deepak Morada declined to comment. Mahindra in an e-mail declined to comment on the government’s rejection of the company’s partnership with Rafael.

“We’re looking at this issue,” said Satish B. Agnihotri, director general of acquisition in the Ministry of Defence. “It’s not just Kalyani, there may be others too who are developing products and we may not have a method of taking that into the procedure.”
Sensitive Areas


In February, V.K. Saraswat, then adviser to the Indian defense minister, said the government will restrain private ventures pertaining to highly security sensitive areas. He didn’t elaborate.

Any change in rules may be slowed by officials’ sensitivities over corruption scandals in previous purchases, including one that helped drive the ruling Congress party to defeat in 1989 elections.

India ordered a federal investigation into allegations of graft in the purchase of 12 helicopters from Italy’s Finmeccanica SpA (FNC), claims that led to the Feb. 12 arrest of the Italian company’s chief executive officer and which could further slow future deals.
Artillery Guns

The Kalyani Group has invested 1 billion rupees in its defense venture that’s building artillery guns, armored vehicles and unmanned ground vehicles. Bharat Forge has separately formed a venture with a unit of Elbit Systems Ltd. (ESLT) to bid for Indian Army’s contracts including for towed guns, mounted guns and upgrade of 130 millimeter artillery guns.

Profit at Bharat Forge, India’s third-largest auto components maker by market value, fell 40 percent in the year ended March 31. The company’s shares, which have fallen 13.4 percent this year, rose for the first time in five days to 218.30 rupees, or up 1.3 percent, at the close in Mumbai.

Local private companies account for 10 percent of India’s defense spending, mostly as sub-contractors to state-owned firms that contribute about 20 percent, according to a 2012 report by Boston Consulting Group Inc. Foreign suppliers control the remaining 70 percent of the supplies.

“It’s been 12 years since the sector was opened up, first for foreign direct investment and then to domestic manufacturing,” said Nidhi Goyal, director of the aerospace and defense team at Deloitte Touche Tohmatsu Ltd. in India. “But there’s been no major contract awarded to the private sector. Then what’s the benefit for the private investor?”
Operation Sunshine

India targets to raise the proportion of defense equipment produced at home to 75 percent from about 30 percent in the next 10 years. Asia’s third-largest economy plans to spend 2.04 trillion rupees in the year that started April 1, from a revised 1.78 trillion rupees last year on defense. Of the total expenditure, 867.4 billion rupees will be used to modernize its forces, up 25 percent from a year earlier.

“A textbook case of how things should be done is joint ownership of programs,” said Kalyani, who’s building the Howitzer gun under the code name Operation Sunshine.

Classic case of red tape and bureaucracy. After 12 years they realized that there might be some hurdles, which have to be looked into!
 
.
Indian beurocrats are jokers. I wonder what the hell they do in their airconditioned office all day except watching **** :mad:
 
.
Indian beurocrats are jokers. I wonder what the hell they do in their airconditioned office all day except watching **** :mad:

Chill bro! These things take time, Indian pvt company participation in Indian defence contests is still a VERY new concept, one that will naturally require many legal and practical changes to existing laws/regulations. These things will naturally happen in time. Things, in the long term, are looking great!!

Even in the last 2-3 years things have changed drastically, I remember articles being written back then calling for these pvt enties to be allowed to take part in such contest but being bared. The picture these articles painted was very bleak, a few years down the road and we are seeing the first steps down this path-good stuff!
 
.
Chill bro! These things take time, Indian pvt company participation in Indian defence contests is still a VERY new concept, one that will naturally require many legal and practical changes to existing laws/regulations. These things will naturally happen in time. Things, in the long term, are looking great!!

Even in the last 2-3 years things have changed drastically, I remember articles being written back then calling for these pvt enties to be allowed to take part in such contest but being bared. The picture these articles painted was very bleak, a few years down the road and we are seeing the first steps down this path-good stuff!

New concept or not, it is clear that if they don't have any testing ground, they would not be able to bid or even verify their products. More than legal changes, they need common sense. Things may be looking great, and would naturally happen, but the term required for these change appear to be veeeeeery long!

This is sheer stupidity. May be if some politicians are made partner, then this lethargy of decision making bodies can be shed.
 
. .
Another example of policy paralysis. If they don't get firing range how can they test their product and bid for the procurement. Govt should allow them to use army test range or give all pvt entities a single new range where they can test their product.
 
.
state govt. will not provide land , if they get that then the files keep rotating between ministries for clearances regarding environment, forest etc etc...
BABUS will demand bribe ......

'..
...
...
..
one decade passed , and no result ......
 
.
Ah now the project is fully ready and they are not allowing testing??Donno what explanation do these people have.For so many years we had no procurement of these guns and now when the situation is very critical,this is how they respond..Unfortunately the speed of our indigenisation and modernization is nowhere compared to what is required.If we move @ this pace the by the time we have modernized/ indigenised considerable portion of our forces they will be absolutely obsolete and we may have to start over and this cycle is going to continue for
 
. . .
Chill bro! These things take time, Indian pvt company participation in Indian defence contests is still a VERY new concept, one that will naturally require many legal and practical changes to existing laws/regulations. These things will naturally happen in time. Things, in the long term, are looking great!!

Even in the last 2-3 years things have changed drastically, I remember articles being written back then calling for these pvt enties to be allowed to take part in such contest but being bared. The picture these articles painted was very bleak, a few years down the road and we are seeing the first steps down this path-good stuff!

That's exactly the problem.It takes too much time and there is just too many regulations.Why is our babus insiting Foriegn investors should have no decision making power in case of Jet Etihad deal.

Consider the case of $2 Bn FDI from IKEA, It took those knuckleheads in CCEA three months to figure out whether they should be allowed to sell food and beverages through their shops.Why the hell would it take so much time.And even after that these idiots more idiotic regulations on top of it such as They cannot pack food for its customers.WTF is wrong with these people.Its just ridiculous.These license Raj era skeletons among our bureaucracy should be fired.They are creating regulations for the sake of the regulations not for the proper functioning of economy.
 
.

Latest posts

Country Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom